No Thread for Tweakers
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
No Thread for Tweakers         


Author: BretCahill
Date: Jul 20, 2008 18:54

When I post solutions on oil and basic necessities for human survival
and you want to discuss sig figs, start another thread.

Bret Cahill
64 Comments
Re: No Thread for Tweakers         


Author: John Larkin
Date: Jul 20, 2008 19:09

On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:54:37 -0700 (PDT), BretCahill@peoplepc.com
wrote:
>When I post solutions on oil and basic necessities for human survival
>and you want to discuss sig figs, start another thread.
>
>
>Bret Cahill
>

Since you seem to be The Messiah, maybe you should post in one of the
religion groups.

John
no comments
Re: No Thread for Tweakers         


Author: BretCahill
Date: Jul 20, 2008 19:22

>>When I post solutions on oil and basic necessities for human
survival
>>and you want to discuss sig figs, start another thread.
> Since you seem to be The Messiah,

In the chat group of the blind . . .
> maybe you should post in one of the
> religion groups.

What? No 0.001%% error?

Bret Cahill
no comments
Re: No Thread for Tweakers         


Author: DB
Date: Jul 20, 2008 23:16

John Larkin wrote:
> BretCahill wrote:
>
>> When I post solutions

!!!!!!!!
> Since you seem to be The Messiah

Fooled you.......
3 Comments
Re: No Thread for Tweakers         


Author: Michael A. Terrell
Date: Jul 21, 2008 05:26

DB wrote:
>
> John Larkin wrote:
>> BretCahill wrote:
>>
>>> When I post solutions
>
> !!!!!!!!
>
>> Since you seem to be The Messiah
>
> Fooled you.......

A fool would think so.

--
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html

If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm

Sporadic E is the Earth's aluminum foil beanie for the 'global warming'
sheep.
no comments
Re: No Thread for Tweakers         


Author: Bret Cahill
Date: Jul 21, 2008 07:58

Liquid fuel costs are increasing 30%% a year and that rate is
increasing. Many solutions will take years to implement so the
situation makes any WWII effort look like a picnic. Several decimal
place accuracy may be necessary for the final design work but all that
is necessary -- what am I saying? -- all that is _desirable_ for the
initial conception is basic logic.

The patent office doesn't require or even recommend dimensioning
unless it's critical for the operation of the invention. Only a silly
goose would whine about back of envelope calculations when a new idea
is being introduced.

There is no question the lite posts have entertainment value but if
your comment doesn't amount to at least tens of billions of dollars a
year in energy costs, stay off my threads on alternatives to oil or
you will be ridiculed off them.

There are plenty of threads out there for bean counters.

Bret Cahill
no comments
Re: No Thread for Tweakers         


Author: John Fields
Date: Jul 21, 2008 08:57

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:58:01 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
aol.com> wrote:
>Liquid fuel costs are increasing 30%% a year and that rate is
>increasing. Many solutions will take years to implement so the
>situation makes any WWII effort look like a picnic. Several decimal
>place...
Show full article (1.06Kb)
no comments
Re: No Thread for Tweakers         


Author: Bret Cahill
Date: Jul 21, 2008 10:16

>>Liquid fuel costs are increasing 30%% a year and that rate is
>>increasing. �Many solutions will take years to implement so the
>>situation makes any WWII effort look like a picnic. �Several decimal
>>place accuracy may be necessary for the final design work but all that
>>is necessary -- what am I saying? -- all that is _desirable_ for the
>>initial conception is basic logic.
>
>>The patent office doesn't require or even recommend dimensioning
>>unless it's critical for the operation of the invention. �Only a silly
>>goose would whine about back of envelope calculations when a new idea
>>is being introduced.
>
>>There is no question the lite posts have entertainment value but if
>>your comment doesn't amount to at least tens of billions of dollars a
>>year in energy costs, stay off my threads on alternatives to oil or
>>you will be ridiculed off them.
>
> ---
> I think the ridicule is more likely to be heaped on you, considering
> your hare-brained "idea" of circular plowing. ...
Show full article (1.12Kb)
no comments
Re: No Thread for Tweakers         


Author: John Fields
Date: Jul 21, 2008 10:59

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:16:05 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
aol.com> wrote:
>>>Liquid fuel costs are increasing 30%% a year and that rate is
>>>increasing. ?Many solutions will take years to implement so the
>>>situation makes any WWII effort look like a picnic. ?Several decimal...
Show full article (1.27Kb)
no comments
Re: No Thread for Tweakers         


Author: Bret Cahill
Date: Jul 21, 2008 11:35

>>>>Liquid fuel costs are increasing 30%% a year and that rate is
>>>>increasing. ?Many solutions will take years to implement so the
>>>>situation makes any WWII effort look like a picnic. ?Several decimal
>>>>place accuracy may be necessary for the final design work but all that
>>>>is necessary -- what am I saying? -- all that is _desirable_ for the
>>>>initial conception is basic logic.
>
>>>>The patent office doesn't require or even recommend dimensioning
>>>>unless it's critical for the operation of the invention. ?Only a silly
>>>>goose would whine about back of envelope calculations when a new idea
>>>>is being introduced.
>
>>>>There is no question the lite posts have entertainment value but if
>>>>your comment doesn't amount to at least tens of billions of dollars a
>>>>year in energy costs, stay off my threads on alternatives to oil or
>>>>you will be ridiculed off them.
>
>>> ---
>>> I think the ridicule is more likely to be heaped on you, considering
>>> your hare-brained "idea" of circular plowing. ...
Show full article (2.10Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7