On Sep 9, 12:54Â am, "bigflet...@
gmail.com"
gmail.com>
wrote:> On Sep 8, 11:45Â pm, "Sean"
now.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> "Sean"
now.com.au> wrote in message>
>
>>>
gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:5121b546-9c19-4cdb-8578-82921e211fbf@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Sep 8, 12:03 am, "Sean" now.com.au> wrote:>>>>
gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>> So did the doco on 9/11 conspiracies & building 7 in particular - boy what
>> synchronicity there? A whole damn doco on that very building. Are you in the
>> zone or what?
>
> Doesnt seem to work with Elle grr...
>
>
>
>> All i meant about silverstien was that he was worth billions ---- the day
>> was pretty big deal for him personally, as you see he'd only just bought the
>> whole shebang. So, before 9am the shite hit the fan ....... given the $$$ I
>> had no problem with him having the power if anyone did to get the thing
>> blown up that day. That given that I had no idea how possible it was or
>> wasn't. ON the day .. OK.
>
> Didnt know about silverstein until tonight. That would have been one
> helll of a Jewish stock take.:-)
>
>
>
>> I have no problem that it collapsed due to fire, same thing with the towers.
>> Like i said earlier, just because something was "designed" to do xyz doesn;t
>> mean the actual building of it was. Devils in the details isn't.
>
> The way the three came tumbling down. No wonder the radicles thought
> Allah was on their side that day.
>
>
>
>> Note the aggressiveness from "belief" by the 9/11 doco maker when asked
>> about Richard Clarke.
>
> Indeed. It was also interesting on how the Norweigen demolishan expert
> saw a perfect example of implosion, and the comments of the ex prof
> who suggested the chemical explosives.
>
>>Fact is the day Bush took over they switched off the
>> Al Queda priority that was #1 when Clinton left office .... the neocons had
>> other ideas and everything was put back into a review type status. Richard
>> Clarke couldn't even get to meet with the National security advisor Condi
>> Rice -- just wasn't their concern, and Bush needed lot's of holidays too.
>
>> It's not so much conspiracy but incompetence -- just that some people
>> believe that the USA's "talents", be it buildings or intelligence, Â is a lot
>> better than it really is.
>
> I think that view gets clouded when you think of smart bombs and Mars
> landing.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> Have you noticed that there's been 3 major collapses of Cranes in the USA
>> this year. You think that's a conspiracy, or just a co-incidence. A third of
>> all the worlds cranes are in Dubai now, how many have collapsed there in the
>> last 5 years?
>
>> I'll tell you, none.
>
>> That's pretty much sums up my opinion in a nutshell. Occam's razor iow.
>
>> Doesn't mean I trust the totality of the 9/11 commission opinions, or the
>> CIA, or their system. Surely Iraq has more than proven this? The USA did
>> play a major role for many years that killed the elected President Allende,
>> and put Pinochet into power. That still is unresolved or healed in Chile.
>> and the beat goes on ....................
>
>> I'd be interested to hear what you got out of the doco brian,
>> so cheers mate.-
>
> I thought it was a well balanced approach, which to me, means it will
> confirm  both sides of the argument..:-).
>
> The most compelling argument against conspiracy was the point
> regarding the difficulty of keeping secrecy over such a wide area, but
> of course, there are secret societies that are extremely adept at
> that. It could well have happened without government involvment, but
> included members of the same.
>
> On that basis, there are organisations who seek one world government,
> and these events fitted perfectly into such a scenario with regards to
> Iraq, and the willingness for a large portion of the population to
> relinquish more of their privacy for the sake of 'homeland security',
> also fitting a larger agenda. Those same organisatons recognise how
> much you can fool most of the people most of the time, and is in fact,
> one of the motivations for establishing 'big brother'. To protect
> people against themselves.We know that power over others is the next
> step from aquiring vast wealth.
>
> I suppose Im applying my 'common sense' and my 'overview' in a similar
> way as with physics and metaphysics. Curious about how, but quite
> clear on why.
>
> There were so many 'coincidences' that in a court, that amount of
> anecdotal evidence would create legitimate doubt regardless of the
> verdict, and that like any such cataclysmic events, motivates the
> individual to 'look deeper'.
>
> What hit me more than anything else, was when I was sent the wingdings
> link form 'somebody who knew better', without any explanation.
>
> To those who dont know what Im referring to. Q33NY representing Q for
> Quran 33 being the two triangles in the star of David, and NY being
> obvious.
>
> The biggest point to come out of the doco for me, was the amazing %% of
> the population that think the government was involved and further than
> that, what little effect such views have on day to day life.
>
> Cheers Sean
>
> BOfL- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
>The way the three came tumbling down. No wonder the radicles
thought Allah was on their side that day.<
Or how to kill three stones with two birds - yeah allah really smiled
upon the the ragheads that day - !?
