On Sep 8, 2:45Â pm, "Sean"
now.com.au> wrote:> "Sean"
now.com.au> wrote in message
>
> news:48c500af$0$28213$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>>
gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:5121b546-9c19-4cdb-8578-82921e211fbf@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>> On Sep 8, 12:03 am, "Sean" now.com.au> wrote:>>>
gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>>>
gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>> Hi mate,
>
>>> yes saw what u referred to, and sure lot's of confirmations.
>
>>> My only point regarding 99.9%% of the theories, is that they are all bent
>>> out
>>> of shape about things that didn;t even happen based simply on "stories"
>>> about things not being there, and it snowballs into xyz based on
>>> mis-information or missing info and bravado by people who have no clue at
>>> all. an example .... some claim it wan't even planes that hit the towers.
>>> I
>>> would beg to differ. So it's mushed up bs. Doesn't mean everything adds
>>> up,
>>> people have been known to do anything and everything. I have my
>>> suspicions,
>>> but really it doesn't matter. cheers :-)
>
>> An interesting four corners is on tomorrow about the very subject.
>
>> Im sure it will be upto their very exacting standards.
>
>> Knowing how people 'shape' interpretations to suit their state of
>> consciousness (no more entrenched stories than those of the religious
>> nature), I still find it fascinating from a detached pov, to see what
>> actually happens.
>
>> I didnt quite follow your point regarding building three when you
>> mentioned money moving mountains. I didnt know it actually happened
>> until I watched Zeitgeist.
>
>> BOfL
>
>> -----------------------------
>
>> Building 7 .... tsk, watching 4 corners now, and i thought gee, what a
>> co-incidence hehehehe
>
>> catch ya later :-)
>
>> sean
>
> So did the doco on 9/11 conspiracies & building 7 in particular - boy what
> synchronicity there? A whole damn doco on that very building. Are you in the
> zone or what?
>
> All i meant about silverstien was that he was worth billions ---- the day
> was pretty big deal for him personally, as you see he'd only just bought the
> whole shebang. So, before 9am the shite hit the fan ....... given the $$$ I
> had no problem with him having the power if anyone did to get the thing
> blown up that day. That given that I had no idea how possible it was or
> wasn't. ON the day .. OK.
>
> I have no problem that it collapsed due to fire, same thing with the towers.
> Like i said earlier, just because something was "designed" to do xyz doesn;t
> mean the actual building of it was. Devils in the details isn't.
>
> Note the aggressiveness from "belief" by the 9/11 doco maker when asked
> about Richard Clarke. Fact is the day Bush took over they switched off the
> Al Queda priority that was #1 when Clinton left office .... the neocons had
> other ideas and everything was put back into a review type status. Richard
> Clarke couldn't even get to meet with the National security advisor Condi
> Rice -- just wasn't their concern, and Bush needed lot's of holidays too.
>
> It's not so much conspiracy but incompetence -- just that some people
> believe that the USA's "talents", be it buildings or intelligence, Â is a lot
> better than it really is.
>
> Have you noticed that there's been 3 major collapses of Cranes in the USA
> this year. You think that's a conspiracy, or just a co-incidence. A third of
> all the worlds cranes are in Dubai now, how many have collapsed there in the
> last 5 years?
>
> I'll tell you, none.
>
> That's pretty much sums up my opinion in a nutshell. Occam's razor iow.
>
> Doesn't mean I trust the totality of the 9/11 commission opinions, or the
> CIA, or their system. Surely Iraq has more than proven this? The USA did
> play a major role for many years that killed the elected President Allende,
> and put Pinochet into power. That still is unresolved or healed in Chile.
> and the beat goes on ....................
>
> I'd be interested to hear what you got out of the doco brian,
> so cheers mate.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
>It's not so much conspiracy but incompetence<
Yeah,cool, but maybe thats your answer - that the conspiracy was the
incompetance - the incompetance of the conspiracy. Conspiracy is
inherent in poltics as in business. Histories of th eworld - if you
dont like the word conspiracy then try "plottings or plotters"
