On Sep 8, 11:45Â pm, "Sean"
now.com.au> wrote:> "Sean"
now.com.au> wrote in message
>
> news:48c500af$0$28213$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>>
gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:5121b546-9c19-4cdb-8578-82921e211fbf@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>> On Sep 8, 12:03 am, "Sean" now.com.au> wrote:>>>
gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>
> So did the doco on 9/11 conspiracies & building 7 in particular - boy what
> synchronicity there? A whole damn doco on that very building. Are you in the
> zone or what?
Doesnt seem to work with Elle grr...
>
> All i meant about silverstien was that he was worth billions ---- the day
> was pretty big deal for him personally, as you see he'd only just bought the
> whole shebang. So, before 9am the shite hit the fan ....... given the $$$ I
> had no problem with him having the power if anyone did to get the thing
> blown up that day. That given that I had no idea how possible it was or
> wasn't. ON the day .. OK.
Didnt know about silverstein until tonight. That would have been one
helll of a Jewish stock take.:-)
>
> I have no problem that it collapsed due to fire, same thing with the towers.
> Like i said earlier, just because something was "designed" to do xyz doesn;t
> mean the actual building of it was. Devils in the details isn't.
The way the three came tumbling down. No wonder the radicles thought
Allah was on their side that day.
>
> Note the aggressiveness from "belief" by the 9/11 doco maker when asked
> about Richard Clarke.
Indeed. It was also interesting on how the Norweigen demolishan expert
saw a perfect example of implosion, and the comments of the ex prof
who suggested the chemical explosives.
>Fact is the day Bush took over they switched off the
> Al Queda priority that was #1 when Clinton left office .... the neocons had
> other ideas and everything was put back into a review type status. Richard
> Clarke couldn't even get to meet with the National security advisor Condi
> Rice -- just wasn't their concern, and Bush needed lot's of holidays too.
>
> It's not so much conspiracy but incompetence -- just that some people
> believe that the USA's "talents", be it buildings or intelligence, Â is a lot
> better than it really is.
I think that view gets clouded when you think of smart bombs and Mars
landing.
>
> Have you noticed that there's been 3 major collapses of Cranes in the USA
> this year. You think that's a conspiracy, or just a co-incidence. A third of
> all the worlds cranes are in Dubai now, how many have collapsed there in the
> last 5 years?
>
> I'll tell you, none.
>
> That's pretty much sums up my opinion in a nutshell. Occam's razor iow.
>
> Doesn't mean I trust the totality of the 9/11 commission opinions, or the
> CIA, or their system. Surely Iraq has more than proven this? The USA did
> play a major role for many years that killed the elected President Allende,
> and put Pinochet into power. That still is unresolved or healed in Chile.
> and the beat goes on ....................
>
> I'd be interested to hear what you got out of the doco brian,
> so cheers mate.-
I thought it was a well balanced approach, which to me, means it will
confirm both sides of the argument..:-).
The most compelling argument against conspiracy was the point
regarding the difficulty of keeping secrecy over such a wide area, but
of course, there are secret societies that are extremely adept at
that. It could well have happened without government involvment, but
included members of the same.
On that basis, there are organisations who seek one world government,
and these events fitted perfectly into such a scenario with regards to
Iraq, and the willingness for a large portion of the population to
relinquish more of their privacy for the sake of 'homeland security',
also fitting a larger agenda. Those same organisatons recognise how
much you can fool most of the people most of the time, and is in fact,
one of the motivations for establishing 'big brother'. To protect
people against themselves.We know that power over others is the next
step from aquiring vast wealth.
I suppose Im applying my 'common sense' and my 'overview' in a similar
way as with physics and metaphysics. Curious about how, but quite
clear on why.
There were so many 'coincidences' that in a court, that amount of
anecdotal evidence would create legitimate doubt regardless of the
verdict, and that like any such cataclysmic events, motivates the
individual to 'look deeper'.
What hit me more than anything else, was when I was sent the wingdings
link form 'somebody who knew better', without any explanation.
To those who dont know what Im referring to. Q33NY representing Q for
Quran 33 being the two triangles in the star of David, and NY being
obvious.
The biggest point to come out of the doco for me, was the amazing %% of
the population that think the government was involved and further than
that, what little effect such views have on day to day life.
Cheers Sean
BOfL
