On Sep 6, 8:05Â pm, "Sean" now.com.au> wrote:
>> On Sep 6, 2:45 pm, Day Brown daybrown.org> wrote:
>
>>> Langevinger66 wrote:
>>>> On 4 sep, 18:05, Day Brown daybrown.org> wrote:
>
>>>>> 28 seconds into it, we see the core columns still standing, swaying
>>>>> from
>>>>> side to side. 1/2 a minute later, we see them stop swaying and
>>>>> realize
>>>>> they are falling, as if into a mine shaft.
>
>>>>> That is, going straight down. This does not make any sense. What is
>>>>> making them fall like that? Why dont they keep standing like flag
>>>>> poles?
>
>>>>> Or- has the video been photoshopped?
>
>>>> lots of cameras on this 911 shit
>
>>> Well yes, but most were on the ground, and as soon as the dust cloud
>>> rose, were unable to see the core columns still standing while the rest
>>> of the tower collapsed.
>
>>> Look carefully at the video, and freeze frame it. You can see the core
>>> columns still standing. They were not knocked down as a result of the
>>> planes, and something else was going on to make them drop into the
>>> footprint of the building rather than, as we'd expect, falling over to
>>> one side or other, either on top of some other building or into the
>>> street.
>
>>> SOMETHING was breaking each steel column into small pieces so that they
>>> would go straight down.
>
>> PS I started life as a cadet structural enginer, and my frst lecture
>> was on the foundations of the twin towers.
>
>> BOfL- Hide quoted text -
>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Also, the science of implosion is very precise. Of course is now
> redundant. Just a well placed explosion near the top.
>
> Of course, the twin towers were disigned to resist plane crashes, but
> dont let the facts get in the way of a good storie (pardon the pun).
>
> You can fool most of the people most of the time...
>
> BOfL
>
> --------------------------------
>
> Architecs, engineers, builders, and tradesmen have been known to make
> mistakes. Â Suppliers have been known to cut corners. It's the capitalistic
> model you know. Unless folks also think that Katrina the hurricane was also
> part of a conspiracy. vs basic incompetence re the warnings and the levees
> and the walls design and maintenance. ;-)
>
> So "Designed to...." is only part of the story, isn't it?
>
> Osama bin Laden, and Mohamed Atta, were also engineers. They weren't
> necessarily just lucky. But I don't know for sure.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Hi Sean,
What piqued my interest was the movie Zeitgeist, which is on youtube
if you havent watched it.
Covers a wide perspective, from 'the power of now' approach, through
to the conspiracy of one world government. There was also some
interesting footage of the 'two towers".
In the late seventies, I read The Cosmic Conspiracy by Stan Deyo, and
two weeks later I was conducting an fitness appraisal on an Indian
member, where I just mentioned it in passing. He became agitated, and
informed me "we dont like to talk about him. "Who's we" I asked. "The
family, he's my brother in law"
He confirmed he was a staff member of the CIA, and didnt like what he
saw, wrote the book, and ws told by his masters to get as far away
from the US as you can. Perth was the place.
I dont think they saw it as too much of a threat, because most would
think of the book as so much fantacy. There was a top ABC news reader
who became a fan of Deyo at the time,called Noel ???, who was dumped
as soon as that got out.
One of the first in a row of remarkable coincidences on the 'bigger
picture' going on at the time!
After watching Zeitgeist, I was more interested in the way the
constitution was being 'modified' regarding the freedoms of the
citizenry, who ( iI remember hearing way back) would not only not
rebel but actually welcome such restrictions.I concluded back then,
that if this was the case, fear of not 'welcoming' would have to be
evoked
The dates were interesting plus the one piece that really grabbed my
attention was the Q33NY wingdings reference.
As we both know, self awareness involves recognising components of
ones nature, and putting the pieces together.
I have come to the conclusion that we do that with externel events
first, and in the process, discover the inner reality of such
searching. Confirmation always wins over information.
Cheers
BOfL