gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b23ac200-9cd1-471c-9635-a0bf7ee267d5@b2g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 6, 2:45 pm, Day Brown daybrown.org> wrote:
> Langevinger66 wrote:
>> On 4 sep, 18:05, Day Brown
daybrown.org> wrote:>
>>> 28 seconds into it, we see the core columns still standing, swaying
>>> from
>>> side to side. 1/2 a minute later, we see them stop swaying and realize
>>> they are falling, as if into a mine shaft.
>
>>> That is, going straight down. This does not make any sense. What is
>>> making them fall like that? Why dont they keep standing like flag
>>> poles?
>
>>> Or- has the video been photoshopped?
>
>> lots of cameras on this 911 shit
>
> Well yes, but most were on the ground, and as soon as the dust cloud
> rose, were unable to see the core columns still standing while the rest
> of the tower collapsed.
>
> Look carefully at the video, and freeze frame it. You can see the core
> columns still standing. They were not knocked down as a result of the
> planes, and something else was going on to make them drop into the
> footprint of the building rather than, as we'd expect, falling over to
> one side or other, either on top of some other building or into the
> street.
>
> SOMETHING was breaking each steel column into small pieces so that they
> would go straight down.
PS I started life as a cadet structural enginer, and my frst lecture
was on the foundations of the twin towers.
BOfL
--------------------------------------
Hi Brian,
I usually ignore such matters for obvious reasons. Cognitive dissonance from
others can be disconcerting. Such are the ways of strongly held beliefs. ;-)
You're probably aware of all the theories about the pentagon crash. Here's a
good example of how easy it is to knock down all the so called unaswered
questions that have been raised.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8
Pretty well says it all ..... just apply the same approach to the other
locations, and it all goes away.
With the exception of Building 7 - but money can move mountains as well as
buildings, so that it also collapsed doesn't cause me any problems.
I have yet to hear of one conspiracy theory about the 9/11 attacks that
can't be rationally explained using common sense and a dash of accurate
information. Doesn't mean anyone would "beleive" it. ;-)
That's not to say many questions have yet to be answered, and no doubt never
will be. My occam razor usually ends up with one word .... incompetance and
ignorance. Two words !
Any evidence to the contrary, I am more than happy to hear or look at. fwiw
I read the entire 9/11 report, and cross referenced key aspects, and it all
adds up to me as it is [ given it's a govt/political report of course I
don't believe it's the whole truth either , some things have been glossed
over for sure. ]
cheers sean
