Free Lunch wrote:

Human Ancestral Frauds Piltdown man: Found in a gravel pit in Sussex
England in 1912, this fossil was considered by some sources to be the
second most important fossil proving the evolution of man - until it was
found to be a complete forgery 41 years later. The skull was found to be
of modern age. The fragments had been chemically stained to give the
appearance of age, and the teeth had been filed down! Nebraska man: A
single tooth, discovered in Nebraska in 1922 grew an entire evolutionary
link between man and monkey, until another identical tooth was found
which was protruding from the jawbone of a wild pig. Java man: Initially
discovered by Dutchman Eugene Dubois in 1891, all that was found of this
claimed originator of humans was a skullcap, three teeth and a femur.
The femur was found 50 feet away from the original skullcap a full year
later. For almost 30 years Dubois downplayed the Wadjak skulls (two
undoubtedly human skulls found very close to his "missing link").
(source: Hank Hanegraaff, The Face That Demonstrates The Farce Of
Evolution, [Word Publishing, Nashville, 1998], pp.50-52) Orce man: Found
in the southern Spanish town of Orce in 1982, and hailed as the oldest
fossilized human remains ever found in Europe. One year later officials
admitted the skull fragment was not human but probably came from a 4
month old donkey. Scientists had said the skull belonged to a 17 year
old man who lived 900,000 to 1.6 million years ago, and even had very
detail drawings done to represent what he would have looked like.
(source: "Skull fragment may not be human", Knoxville News-Sentinel,
1983) Neanderthal: Still synonymous with brutishness, the first
Neanderthal remains were found in France in 1908. Considered to be
ignorant, ape-like, stooped and knuckle-dragging, much of the evidence
now suggests that Neanderthal was just as human as us, and his stooped
appearance was because of arthritis and rickets. Neanderthals are now
recognized as skilled hunters, believers in an after-life, and even
skilled surgeons, as seen in one skeleton whose withered right arm had
been amputated above the elbow. (source: "Upgrading Neanderthal Man",
Time Magazine, May 17, 1971, Vol. 97, No. 20) Human Ancestor Fraud -
Creationist Links A Human Ancestor Fraud Deceptive Fossil
Interpretations of Evolutionists from the Muslim online book Evolution
Deceit Features of Piltdown Skull "Deliberate Fakes" Human Evolution -
Frauds and Mistakes Lucy's Fraudulent Fame Orce man hominid fraud
Piltdown man fraud The Ape-men fallacy by Malcolm Bowden (Review of book
- Ape-men: Fact or Fallacy?) The Face that Demonstrates the Farce of
Evolution The following is a transcript of The Apemen Frauds portion of
the audio tape. The Piltdown Man Fraud by Monty White The Story of the
Piltdown Man by the Creation-Evolution Encyclopedia The Yale DNA
Hybridization Scandal - A UC Berkely professor reports on the
intentional alteration of hybridization data which was used to support
the theory that humans are more closely related to chimpanzees.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny? Haekel's faked embryonic drawings The
theory of embryonic recapitulation asserts that the human fetus goes
through various stages of its evolutionary history as it develops. Ernst
Haeckel proposed this theory in the late 1860's, promoting Darwin's
theory of evolution in Germany. He made detailed drawings of the
embryonic development of eight different embryos in three stages of
development, to bolster his claim. His work was hailed as a great
development in the understanding of human evolution. A few years later
his drawings were shown to have been fabricated, and the data
manufactured. He blamed the artist for the discrepancies, without
admitting that he was the artist. (source: Russell Grigg, "Fraud
Rediscovered", Creation, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp.49-51) Haeckel' Forgeries
Creationary Links Another Evolution Fraud Exposed Evolution Fraud in
Current Biology Textbooks - Haeckel's Ontongeny Haeckel's distortions
did not help Darwin by Stephen Jay Gould Haeckel's Fake Drawings -
Pictures Please Urge Publishers to Fix Textbooks by Texans for Better
Science Education
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archaeoraptor Liaoningensis: Fake Dinosaur-bird ancestor The most recent
and perhaps the most infamous evolution frauds was committed in China
and published in 1999 in the journal National Geographic 196:98-107,
November 1999. Dinosaur bones were put together with the bones of a
newer species of bird and they tried to pass it off as a very important
new evolutionary intermediate. "Feathers For T-Rex?", Christopher P.
Sloan, National Geographic Magazine, Vol. 196, No. 5, November, 1999,
pp.99,100,105 Interesting Quote - "National Geographic has reached an
all-time low for engaging in sensationalistic, unsubstantiated, tabloid
journalism" Storrs L. Olson, Smithsonian Institution Archaeoraptor
Liaoningensis Creationary Links Adventist Scientist Comments on
Retraction of Evolutionary "Missing Link" Claim And now: Feathered
Dinosaur Link Another Evolution Fraud By Tim Friend, USA TODAY Another
Fossil Flub Another Hoax by Owen D. Olbricht Another 'Missing Link'
Takes Flight Another "OOOPS" For Science Archaeoraptor Flight Aborted by
John Morris Archaeopteryx, Archaeoraptor, and the "Dinosaurs-To-Birds"
Theory ... Archaeoraptor: Feathered Dinosaur from National Geographic
Doesn't Fly ... IMPACT No. 321 by Steven A. Austin, Ph.D Archaeoraptor
Hoax Update - National Geographic Recants! Archaeoraptor: National
Geographic's Biggest Embarassment by Craig McClarren Archaeoraptor:
Phony 'feathered' fossil by Jonathan Sarfati Archaeoraptor: Some
interesting points about this particular hoax Crying Fowl: Tale of
'Missing Link' Embarrasses Scientists 'Dragon' fossils seized EVOLUTION
COVER-UP Evolution Hoax The Archaeoraptor Fraud Evolution: The Fraud
That Shapes The Worldview of Our Kids By Bob Harsh and Chuck Colson.
Origins Insights March 2000 Newsletter by the Creation Science
Fellowship "Feathered Dinosaur" Claim Apparently a Fake National
Geographic backs down - sort of! By Carl Wieland National Geographic
Gets a Black Eye National Geographic Eats Crow National Geographic
retracts boast of dinosaur-to-bird 'missing link' Smithsonian criticizes
National Geographic's Dino-to-Bird Claims revealing the lack of
consensus on the matter among scientists, despite National Geographic's
sensationalistic "propagandizing". Smithsonian critiques National
Geographic in open letter archaeoraptor The Missing Link That Wasn't ...
National Geographic's Bird Dinosaur Flew Again the Facts by Nancy
Pearcey,. Access Research Network The Archaeoraptor Fraud - by Charles
Colson The Archaeoraptor Fraud: National Geographic The Latest Fraud!
The Missing Link that Wasn't: National Geographic's 'Bird Dinosaur' Flew
Against the Facts The Piltdown Chicken Well, Folks...It Happened Again!
News Articles Published on The Archaeoraptor Liaoningensis Discovery
Second Piece of Fossil Forgery Identified Scientific American 11/21/02
Comparing Modern Birds with The Missing Link Fossils FEATHERED CREATURES
FROM CHINA BOOST DINOSAUR-BIRD CONNECTION Flying dinosaur was mean,
graceless: Fiercesome bird may have been first flying feathered animal
to evolve Fossils from China Link Birds With Dinosaurs MISSING LINK
BETWEEN DINOSAURS AND BIRDS FOUND IN CHINA: Dino Land Has the Full Story
of Dinosaur-Bird Evolution and the Latest Exciting Development! 'Missing
Link' Dino Actually Two Animals ABCNEWS.com New Birdlike Dinosaurs from
China Are True Missing Links NEW BIRDLIKE DINOSAURS ON VIEW: COULD T.
REX HAVE HAD FEATHERS / T. Rex mit Federn Researchers find fossils of
primitive flying dinosaur Think of it as a 120 million-year-old turkey:
Archaeoraptor liaoningensis may be missing link between ground-based
dinosaurs and birds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miscellaneous Fakes and Frauds Brontosaurus: One of the best known
dinosaurs in books and museums for the past hundred years, brontosaurus
never really existed. The dinosaur's skeleton was found with the head
missing. To complete it, a skull found three or four miles away was
added. No one knew this for years. The body actually belonged to a
species of Diplodocus and the head was from an Apatosaurus. (source:
Paul S. Taylor, The Great Dinosaur Mystery and the Bible, [Chariot
Victor Publishing, 1989], pp.12-13) General Evolution Fraud Links 10
Notorious Darwinist Fabrications Anatomy of a Hoax by Sean Meek Dinosaur
webcam pictures -- fake, hoax photos and pics Evolution Fraud in School
Scienfic Textbooks Evolution fraud in current biology textbooks Worldnet
Magazine 2001 Exposed as fakes decades ago, major publishers still
include them Evolution Forgeries from the Muslim online book Evolution
Deceit Gaps in the Textbooks' Coverage of the Fossil Record by Texans
for Better Science Education Forensic geochemistry solves fossil riddles
..Geological Society News - New forensic tools developed to spot fossil
fakes. Scientists behaving badly - Journal editors reveal researchers'
wicked ways Nature 3/4/2004 Survival of The Fakest Part I or Survival of
The Fakest Part II by Jonathan Wells (PDF download) Textbook Fraud:
Inherit The Wind is intellectual pornography!: Full of Lies, deception
and very anti-Christian. Textbook Fraud: The Horse Series; Hyracotherium
"dawn horse" eohippus, mesohippus, ... Text book Fraud! Video -&
Documentation by Don Patton THE CASE OF ARCHAEOPTERYX The evidence
strongly indicates it is a fake Archaeopteryx (unlike Archaeoraptor) is
NOT a hoax - it is a true bird, not a 'missing link' by Jonathan Sarfati
The Rise of the Evolution Fraud Review of book by Malcolm Bowden

-------------------------

10 NOTORIOUS DARWINIST FABRICATIONS 1. THE LIE THAT "IT HAS BEEN PROVED
THAT LIFE COULD HAVE EMERGED BY CHANCE ON THE PRIMITIVE EARTH" The only
evidence cited in evolutionist sources is the 1953 Miller Experiment.
Yet no living cell was created in this experiment, just a few
amino-acids were synthesised. It is mathematically impossible for
amino-acids to form strings in the right sequence by chance and make
proteins, and for these to give rise to a cell. Miller's synthesised
amino-acids are of no significance, since his experiment used gasses
which were not present in the primitive atmosphere on earth. (see
Miller's Experiment) 2. THE LIE THAT "THE HUMAN EMBRYO HAS GILLS" This
claim rests on a scientific fraud committed by the evolutionist
biologist Ernst Haeckel at the beginning of the 20th century. In order
to come up with proof of evolution Haeckel created drawings of the
embryos of such living things as human beings, chickens and fish and
placed them side by side. Yet there were distortions in these images.
Today the whole scientific world recognises these as counterfeit. The
structure shown as a "gill" by Haeckel is actually the beginning of the
middle ear channel, the parathyroid and the thymus glands. (see The
Recapitulation Misconseption) 3. THE LIE THAT "NATURAL HISTORY CONFIRMS
THE TREE OF LIFE" Darwinism maintains that life on earth originated and
developed from a single root, subsequently splitting off into branches,
like a tree. Evolutionists have struggled to make natural history fit
this claim for 150 years. Yet natural history actually paints a
diametrically opposed picture. The fossil record shows that there was no
"tree of life" and that the basic groups of living things emerged
suddenly and at the same time. Almost all the known phyla (basic groups
of living things) emerged in the Cambrian period, some 530-520 million
years ago. (see The "Tree of Life" is Collapsing) 4. THE LIE THAT
"ARCHAEOPTERYX IS THE MISSING LINK BETWEEN REPTILES AND BIRDS" The
150-million-year-old bird fossil known as Archaeopteryx has been
portrayed as "the greatest fossil evidence of evolution" since the 19th
century. It has been claimed that this fossil possesses certain
reptilian features, for which reason it is the "missing link" between
reptiles and birds. This claim has been invalidated, however, by recent
findings that prove that Archaeopteryx was a perfect flying bird.
Moreover, the alleged reptilian ancestors for birds, the theropod
dinosaurs, are all younger than Archaeopteryx in terms of their
appearance in the fossil record; a fact which evolutionists try to hide.
(see The Archaeopteryx Misconception) 5. THE LIE THAT "THE EVOLUTION OF
THE HORSE HAS BEEN PROVEN BY THE FOSSIL RECORD" For decades now, 'the
evolution of the horse' has been portrayed as one of the best documented
proofs of evolution. Four-legged mammals which lived at different times
have been lined up, from small to large, and these "horse series"
exhibited in museums of natural history. Research in recent years,
however, has revealed that the creatures in the series were not one
another's ancestors, that the sequence is gravely mistaken, and that the
creatures portrayed as the ancestors of the horse actually emerged after
the horse. (see The Myth of Horse Evolution) 6. THE LIE THAT "LIVING
THINGS POSSESS VESTIGAL ORGANS" For a long time now it has been
maintained in evolutionist sources that some organs in living things
serve no function, and that these are evolutionary blind spots inherited
from the evolutionary ancestors of the creatures in question. For
instance, the human appendix and coccyx were for long years regarded as
such vestigal organs. Yet the latest scientific findings have revealed
that all these organs do actually have important functions. The "list of
vestigal organs" drawn up by evolutionists at the beginning of the 20th
century is now without foundation. (see The Myth of Vestigal Organs) 7.
THE LIE THAT "VERTEBRATES' FIVE-FINGERED HAND STRUCTURE IS EVIDENCE OF
EVOLUTION" The dolphin's fin, the bat's wing and the human hand all
contain a five-fingered bone structure. This similarity has for a long
time been put forward in evolutionist schoolbooks or popular
publications as evidence they all evolved from a common ancestor.
Genetic research, however, has shown that these organs, which seem so
alike on the surface, are actually controlled by very different genes.
Evolutionists today admit that "similar organs do not represent evidence
of evolution." (see The Fall of the Homology in Tetrapod Limbs) 8. THE
LIE THAT "INDUSTRIAL MELLANISM IS EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION BY NATURAL
SELECTION" Among the most frequently repeated so-called "proofs" of the
theory of evolution in the world is that of the moth population in Great
Britain during the Industrial Revolution in the 19th century. According
to this claim, air population darkened the colour of tree bark, which
meant that since dark coloured moths had better camouflage they were
protected from bird predators, as a result of which the dark coloured
moth population increased. Yet this is not evolution, because no new
species of mothsemerged. All that happened was the population levels of
previously existing species changed. Moreover, recent works on the story
show that the story itself was not true at all; the famous pictures of
moths resting on trees were fake and no such "industrial mellanism"
(darkening of colour due to industrial pollution) ever took place. (see
The True Story of Industrial Melanism) 9. THE LIE THAT "MUTATION
EXPERIMENTS ARE PROOF OF EVOLUTION" Mutations are one of the two
"evolutionary mechanisms" proposed by neo-Darwinism. It is suggested
that these chance modifications to DNA caused living things to evolve.
Thousands of mutation experiments have been performed to back up this
claim. Some populations of living things, fruit flies in particular,
have been subjected to intense mutation. Evolutionist publications
portray these mutation experiments as "laboratory evidence of
evolution." Yet the fact is that far from confirming evolution these
experiments have actually undermined it. In not one living thing exposed
to mutation has an increase in its genetic information been observed. On
the contrary, mutants (living things exposed to mutation) are always
deformed, sterile and sickly. (see Mutations) 10. THE LIE THAT "FOSSILS
PROVE THAT APE-MEN ONCE LIVED" Darwinism's mort prominent deception is
the claim that man evolved from ape-like creatures. This claim has been
imposed on society by means of thousands of fictitious drawings and
models. The fact is that there is no evidence that "ape-men" ever lived.
Australopithecus, portrayed as man's oldest ancestor, was actually an
extinct ape species, not so very different from modern chimpanzees.
Classifications such as Homo erectus, placed after Australopithecus in
the evolutionary chain, Homo sapiens neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens
archaic, were all different human races. (see The Imaginary Family Tree
of Man)

-------------------------

The Myth of Horse Evolution One important subject in the origin of
mammals is the myth of the "evolution of the horse," also a topic to
which evolutionist publications have devoted a considerable amount of
space for a long time. This is a myth, because it is based on
imagination rather than scientific findings. Until recently, an
imaginary sequence supposedly showing the evolution of the horse was
advanced as the principal fossil evidence for the theory of evolution.
Today, however, many evolutionists themselves frankly admit that the
scenario of horse evolution is bankrupt. In 1980, a four-day symposium
was held at the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago, with 150
evolutionists in attendance, to discuss the problems with the
gradualistic evolutionary theory. In addressing this meeting,
evolutionist Boyce Rensberger noted that the scenario of the evolution
of the horse has no foundation in the fossil record, and that no
evolutionary process has been observed that would account for the
gradual evolution of horses: The popularly told example of horse
evolution, suggesting a gradual sequence of changes from four-toed
fox-sized creatures living nearly 50 million years ago to today's much
larger one-toed horse, has long been known to be wrong. Instead of
gradual change, fossils of each intermediate species appear fully
distinct, persist unchanged, and then become extinct. Transitional forms
are unknown.152 While discussing this important dilemma in the scenario
of the evolution of the horse in a particularly honest way, Rensberger
brought the transitional form difficulty onto the agenda as the greatest
difficulty of all. Dr. Niles Eldredge, a curator at the American Museum
in New York, , where "evolution of the horse" diagrams were on public
display at that time on the ground floor of the museum, said the
following about the exhibition: There have been an awful lot of stories,
some more imaginative than others, about what the nature of that history
[of life] really is. The most famous example, still on exhibit
downstairs, is the exhibit on horse evolution prepared perhaps fifty
years ago. That has been presented as the literal truth in textbook
after textbook. Now I think that is lamentable, particularly when the
people who propose those kinds of stories may themselves be aware of the
speculative nature of some of that stuff.153 Then what is the basis for
the scenario of the evolution of the horse? This scenario was formulated
by means of the deceitful charts devised by the sequential arrangement
of fossils of distinct species that lived at vastly different periods in
India, South Africa, North America, and Europe, solely in accordance
with the rich power of evolutionists' imaginations. More than 20 charts
of the evolution of the horse, which by the way are totally different
from each other, have been proposed by various researchers. Thus, it is
obvious that evolutionists have reached no common agreement on these
family trees. The only common feature in these arrangements is the
belief that a dog-sized creature called Eohippus (Hyracotherium), which
lived in the Eocene period 55 million years ago, was the ancestor of the
horse. However, the fact is that Eohippus, which became extinct millions
of years ago, is nearly identical to the hyrax, a small rabbit-like
animal which still lives in Africa and has nothing whatsoever to do with
the horse.154 The inconsistency of the theory of the evolution of the
horse becomes increasingly apparent as more fossil findings are
gathered. Fossils of modern horse species (Equus nevadensis and Equus
occidentalis) have been discovered in the same layer as Eohippus.155
This is an indication that the modern horse and its so-called ancestor
lived at the same time. The Evolution of the Horse exhibition in
London's Natural History Museum. This and other "evolution of the horse"
diagrams show independent species which lived at different times and in
different places, lined up one after the other in a very subjective
presentation. In reality, there are no scientific discoveries regarding
the evolution of the horse. The evolutionist science writer Gordon R.
Taylor explains this little-acknowledged truth in his book The Great
Evolution Mystery: But perhaps the most serious weakness of Darwinism is
the failure of paleontologists to find convincing phylogenies or
sequences of organisms demonstrating major evolutionary change... The
horse is often cited as the only fully worked-out example. But the fact
is that the line from Eohippus to Equus is very erratic. It is alleged
to show a continual increase in size, but the truth is that some
variants were smaller than Eohippus, not larger. Specimens from
different sources can be brought together in a convincing-looking
sequence, but there is no evidence that they were actually ranged in
this order in time.156 All these facts are strong evidence that the
charts of horse evolution, which are presented as one of the most solid
pieces of evidence for Darwinism, are nothing but fantastic and
implausible fairy tales. Like other species, horses, too, came into
existence without ancestors in the evolutionary sense. 152 Boyce
Rensberger, Houston Chronicle, November 5, 1980, p. 15. (emphasis added)
153 Niles Eldgridge, quoted in Darwin's Enigma by Luther D. Sunderland
(Santee, CA, Master Books, 1988), p. 78. 154 Francis Hitching, The Neck
of the Giraffe: Where Darwin Went Wrong, New American Library, New York,
1982, pp. 16-17, 19. 155 Francis Hitching, The Neck of the Giraffe:
Where Darwin Went Wrong, New American Library, New York, 1982, pp.
16-17, 19. 156 Gordon Rattray Taylor, The Great Evolution Mystery,
Abacus, Sphere Books, London, 1984, p. 230. (emphasis added)