Neuropsychology: "Colour is a pigment of our imagination"
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Neuropsychology: "Colour is a pigment of our imagination"         


Author: D H
Date: Sep 7, 2007 12:13

What I've emphasized is obviously not the "real news" of the article.
Might be of interest to the "Sir Frederick" sub-tradition of this
group.

Color Contrast Is 'Seen' By The Brain Early Doors
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-09/du-cci090707.php

#EXCERPT# Dr Robert Kentridge, lead researcher and lecturer in Durham
University's Psychology Department explains: "Colour is a product of
our nervous system--it is a 'pigment' of our imagination. The colours
that we see are more related to the materials that things are made of
than the light reflected from them into our eyes. Making this happen
involves many complex processes. One of the earliest involves seeing
contrast between pairs of colours. We have found that this important
step of seeing colour contrast happens much earlier in the brain than
we had realised up to now.
Show full article (1.27Kb)
3 Comments
Re: Neuropsychology: "Colour is a pigment of our imagination"         


Author: Immortalist
Date: Sep 8, 2007 11:34

On Sep 7, 12:13 pm, D H budweiser.com> wrote:
> What I've emphasized is obviously not the "real news" of the article.
> Might be of interest to the "Sir Frederick" sub-tradition of this
> group.
>
> Color Contrast Is 'Seen' By The Brain Early Doorshttp://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-09/du-cci090707.php
>
> #EXCERPT# Dr Robert Kentridge, lead researcher and lecturer in Durham
> University's Psychology Department explains: "Colour is a product of
> our nervous system--it is a 'pigment' of our imagination. The colours
> that we see are more related to the materials that things are made of
> than the light reflected from them into our eyes. Making this happen
> involves many complex processes. One of the earliest involves seeing
> contrast between pairs of colours. We have found that this important
> step of seeing colour contrast happens much earlier in the brain than
> we had realised up to now.
>
> "..... Professor Charles Heywood, who leads Durham's Psychology
> Department, added: "People can distinguish between colours partly
> because of the contrast with its background. If someone has lost that ...
Show full article (7.64Kb)
no comments
Re: Neuropsychology: "Colour is a pigment of our imagination"         


Author: D H
Date: Sep 8, 2007 12:41

Immortalist wrote:
> On Sep 7, 12:13 pm, D H budweiser.com> wrote:
>> What I've emphasized is obviously not the "real news" of the article.
>> Might be of interest to the "Sir Frederick" sub-tradition of this
>> group.
>>
>> Color Contrast Is 'Seen' By The Brain Early Doorshttp://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-09/du-cci090707.php
>>
>> #EXCERPT# Dr Robert Kentridge, lead researcher and lecturer in Durham
>> University's Psychology Department explains: "Colour is a product of
>> our nervous system--it is a 'pigment' of our imagination. The colours
>> that we see are more related to the materials that things are made of
>> than the light reflected from them into our eyes. Making this happen
>> involves many complex processes. One of the earliest involves seeing
>> contrast between pairs of colours. We have found that this important
>> step of seeing colour contrast happens much earlier in the brain than
>> we had realised up to now.
>>
>> "..... Professor Charles Heywood, who leads Durham's Psychology
>> Department, added: "People can distinguish between colours partly ...
Show full article (8.72Kb)
no comments
Re: Neuropsychology: "Colour is a pigment of our imagination"         


Author: Immortalist
Date: Sep 8, 2007 21:26

>
> Without any detailed information concerning microbiological and
> microphysical levels, the fruits of causal interactions would more
> often have seemed like reliable miracles or inexplicable emergences
> back in Hume's time. But even today a scientific description doesn't
> capture the effectual power of the original circumstances that it can
> help us manipulate (the "will" that Schopenhauer later referred to?).
> A description of a radio signal does not leap-up and oscillate several
> thousands or millions of times a second like EM waves. Which is why I
> have little idea what kind of "stuff" some linguistic / analytical
> philosophers are sniffing or injecting, when at least a few of them
> seem...
Show full article (15.68Kb)
no comments