Why not multipolitical systems? Another example of 'parallel
realities' in harmony instead of in conflict.
Combining the best of socialism and capitalism.

The amount of energy wasted in the constant wrestling of the two
extremes, could be put to far greater use.

What applies to the individual, could also be appplied to the
collective.Seperation of powers could be the model for the seperation
of public services.

BOfL

On Jun 13, 9:08 pm, "bigflet...@gmail.com" gmail.com>
wrote:

You know it is possible but there would be many complications because
tecelation may not be possible at different scales and fallacious
things might more easily happen.

Composition

On Jun 14, 12:08 am, "bigflet...@gmail.com" gmail.com>
wrote:

The start is in defining that you mean by "multiculturalism".

On Jun 14, 12:36 am, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:

On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:08:39 -0700, bigfletch8@gmail.com wrote:

I think this is exactly what is happening now and is exactly the problem.

But, and this is a big BUT indeed, unlike your suggestion, it is not
admitted too or allowed into political discourse. Things would be a lot
clearer if it were.

What two extremes are you referring to here? "socialism and capitalism"
are schemes of economics not politics. After all, the 'R' in USSR stands
for 'republic', a socialist republic. 'Socialism' and 'republic' are not
mutually exclusive, neither is 'oligarchy' and 'capitalism'.

On Jun 14, 10:16 pm, ZerkonX X.net> wrote:

On Jun 14, 12:53 am, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:

Americanism is the most multicultural instantiation of
multiculturalism that's practical and it helped enable America
to become the great nation that it is. To emphasize the cultural
differences that divide us rather than common interests that unite us
is a pernicious means to divide and subjugate us by those who seek the
power to control us.

On Jun 14, 10:16 pm, ZerkonX X.net> wrote:

Politics and economocs are inextricable linked.

I think so, like in music how a change in timing can throw off the
physical harmony. But most examples of time network relationships
depend upon some physical relationships, at least in the sense of some
patterns persist long enough to be used by other patterns and building
blocks. Usually some stability remains long enough for a number of
shorter stabilities to produce ordered complexity. I don't know this
is where I left off a couple years ago with systems theory.

All known objects are processes. Consciousness is as much an object as
other processes that re-present a present moment through changing
stuff, everything is constantly changing and opposite things are...