On Apr 22, 10:10 am, hedgefundphys...@gmail.com wrote:

MDT’s Fundamental Clues
Imagine a simple theory that explained and accounted for the
following:
1. Light’s velocity is a constant c.
2. Light’s velocity c is independent of its source.
3. Nothing can travel faster than c.
4. A photon, which travels at c, does not age, defining simultaneity.
5. Energy and mass are equivalent. E=mc^2
6. Matter can appear as energy or mass.
7. When matter appears as energy, it propagates at c through space.
8. All matter has particle—local—and wave—nonlocal—properties.
9. All energy has particle—local—and wave—nonlocal—properties.
10. When matter appears as stationary mass, it propagates at c through
the fourth dimension.
11. When matter appears as energy, it propagates at c through the
fourth dimension.
12. To move at c through space is to stand still in the fourth
dimension.
13. To move at c through the fourth dimension is to stand still in
space. ...

MDT underlies the fundamental propagation of a photon.

A photon is ageless because it stays in the exact same place in the
fourth expanding.
A photon's probability distibution expands at the rate of c in
spherically symmetric manner because the fourth dimension expands at
the rate of c in a spherically symmetric manner.
A photon has no rest mass because none of it is at rest in the three
stationary spatial dimensions--all a photon's mass exists entriely in
the fourth dimension.

MDT underlies the fundamental postulate of quantum electrodynamics –-
that wavefunctions of every object propagate over any and all allowed
(unobstructed) paths from the source to the given point. All...

Why Gravity is not Quantized and Electromagetism Is

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gravity freezes the fourth expanding dimension in a snapshot. Hence
general relativity is not based on differential operators and wave
functions.

QM acknowledges the flux of the expanding fourth dimension. Hence QM
is based on differential operators and wave functions.

Gravity does not rely on the nonlocal expansion of the fourth
dimension. Gravity relies on the immediate curvature of the local
spacetime.

QM recognizes that a photon's locality is perpetually smeared into
nonlocality by the fourth expanding dimension. Hence every particle
has its wave, as every particle's local component in the fourth
expanding dimensions is smeared and distributed in a nonlocal manner
by the fourth expanding dimension.

MDT states that the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the
three spatial dimensions. dx4/dt = ic

The universe’s fundamental invariant is this: the fourth dimension is
expanding at the rate of c. This expansion manifests itself as a
spherically-symmetric expanding wavefront with a wavelength of
Planck’s length.

Now let us consider a region of flat space.

And let us superimpose the fourth expanding dimension. Any photon
propagating in the fourth expanding dimension will have a velocity of
c, and its wavelength will remain constant over the flat space.

Now let us introduce a mass M of a star into our system of formerly
flat space. It will curve the space as shown above. Now suppose our
star emits a photon into the fourth expanding dimension.

Where the photon is emitted from the star, its wavelength is about .
75x. After it has traveled far away on the right, its wavelength is
about 3x. Hence MDT accounts for the gravitational redshift for
photons traveling away from stars!

And MDT accomplishes this with its simple premise—the fourth dimension
is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions in units of the
Planck length!

http://physicsmathforums.com

On Apr 24, 8:16 pm, opensourcea...@gmail.com wrote:

Thanks for the references dolittle!

Quantum mechanics has nonlocal properties.

And so does relativity--a photon never ages, and thus remains in the
same place in the fourth expanding dimension, defining a nonlocal
simultaneity.

It should be noted that nonlocal properties shared between two distant
particles, such as action-at-a-distance or spooky "instantaneous"
effects, only occur when those two particles were initially
interacting.

So it is that all nonlocality originates from a common local point.

And too, the velocity of nonlocality is related to the velocity of
light. Do not get me wrong here--although nonlocal actions are
instantaneous, two particles or photons connected by nonlocal means
must have at sometime been in contact, and the nonlocality that they
share is limited by the velocity c at which they can travel apart.

All nonlocality originates from a common point. If two photons are
not initially interacting, they will neverdisplay nonlocal properties
nor spooky "action at a distance."

in order to be a popularizer of a theory, it is not enough
to be literate; you have to have a theory that involves more
than just waving your writing-hand ... or other repulsive disorder ...
waving-away the alleged paradoxes of another theory (heretofore,
Einsteinmania, a Royal Musical Production .-)

Godel's block univere, or the cylindrical "travel-in-time" one,
are merely one-off jokes, although the "flipbook" version has
its uses, as much as a 3D movie; big deal -- get all
of your science-history from the Universal mock-up
of a British holodeck featuring Captain Pickard -- eez French !?!

than *you*, Billy S., for Psalm 46, KJV.

sorry, I just recalled the sequence of the acronym
for Obnoxico's hiding/holding company;
hadn't noticed, before, taht it was AMMO.

no God-am way am I going ot chase this raconteur
-- not as good as Einstein was, of course --
to all of the other newsgroups that he posted to,
under seperate cover. your karma is astrokomikal!

try to explain Kaluza-Klein, if
you want to contribute to our actual comprehension of stuff.

please note, though, that Lee Smolin is a joker:
his fake value of PI, the bogus "loopgravity versus stringtheory"
book, is nothing
but a quasimathematical exercise in obfuscation, or
a loop in the calculator math ... Feigenbaum's "constant?"

thus:
well, not a moment too soon, to decelerate the corn-fed dustbowl
in the Midwest ... hopefully.