Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Sep 17, 2008 07:58
On Sep 14, 6:58 pm, A Situation nothing.com> wrote:> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 09:41:47 +0100, "Giga"
>
> end)ho...@ yahoo.co> wrote:
> >>Because 'nothing' can't exist.
>
> Yes it can. Of course 'nothing' implies non-existence,
> not just 'space'. Thus when considering 'nothing',
> existence cannot be included, or considered, as we
> have.
> As it is, I am daily surprised by there being 'something'.
> That's as close as I, with my constraints, can get to 'nothing'.
How much space represents space?
Nothing is solid, and yet you infer that 'thinginess' is.
The best the mind can come up with is 'something is nothing and
nothing is something'.This is because the mind is simply a binary code
at work.
| 
