|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Day BrownDay Brown Date: Aug 3, 2008 09:30
YMMV. 18th century Bengalese Saint Ramprasad said that everything you
see is part of a "projected matrix" out of the mind of the Goddess.
He also said there are a myriad such worlds. You may, or may not, live
on one where the truth, by any means whatever, is ever revealed, or on
one which it is always self evident.
|
| |
|
| | 9 Comments |
|
|
Author: Langevinger66Langevinger66 Date: Aug 3, 2008 11:37
On 3 aug, 18:30, Day Brown daybrown.org> wrote:> YMMV. 18th century Bengalese Saint Ramprasad said that everything you
> see is part of a "projected matrix" out of the mind of the Goddess.
>
> He also said there are a myriad such worlds. You may, or may not, live
> on one where the truth, by any means whatever, is ever revealed, or on
> one which it is always self evident.
yzzz
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: ShrikebackShrikeback Date: Aug 3, 2008 23:35
On Aug 3, 9:30 am, Day Brown daybrown.org> wrote:> YMMV. 18th century Bengalese Saint Ramprasad said that everything you
> see is part of a "projected matrix" out of the mind of the Goddess.
First of all, it makes no sense for deities to have
gender unless they reproduce sexually. If they
reproduce sexually, why would there be only one
of them (as in _the_ Goddess)? Is she the last
of her kind because she killed the rest of them?
Against post-partum depression, the Goddesses
themselves contend in vain.
> He also said there are a myriad such worlds. You may, or may not, live
> on one where the truth, by any means whatever, is ever revealed, or on
> one which it is always self evident.
This just sounds like an excuse for revealed Truth. "We
got the Real Truth here, on account of our matrix being
better than yours, infidels!
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Day BrownDay Brown Date: Aug 4, 2008 03:14
> On Aug 3, 9:30 am, Day Brown daybrown.org> wrote:>> YMMV. 18th century Bengalese Saint Ramprasad said that everything you
>> see is part of a "projected matrix" out of the mind of the Goddess.
>
> First of all, it makes no sense for deities to have
> gender unless they reproduce sexually. If they
> reproduce sexually, why would there be only one
> of them (as in _the_ Goddess)? Is she the last
> of her kind because she killed the rest of them?
There are some animals that dont need sex to reproduce. The Goddess
likewise has always been regarded as parthenogenic. This is why Athen's
temple is devoted to "Athena Parthenos", and is named the "Parthenon".
|
| Show full article (1.24Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ShrikebackShrikeback Date: Aug 4, 2008 07:55
On Aug 4, 3:14 am, Day Brown daybrown.org> wrote:>> On Aug 3, 9:30 am, Day Brown daybrown.org> wrote:>>> YMMV. 18th century Bengalese Saint Ramprasad said that everything you
>>> see is part of a "projected matrix" out of the mind of the Goddess.
>
>> First of all, it makes no sense for deities to have
>> gender unless they reproduce sexually. If they
>> reproduce sexually, why would there be only one
>> of them (as in _the_ Goddess)? Is she the last
>> of her kind because she killed the rest of them?
>
> There are some animals that dont need sex to reproduce. The Goddess
> likewise has always been regarded as parthenogenic. This is why Athen's
> temple is devoted to "Athena Parthenos", and is named the "Parthenon".
|
| Show full article (1.71Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Aug 4, 2008 08:05
On Aug 4, 8:14 pm, Day Brown daybrown.org> wrote:>> On Aug 3, 9:30 am, Day Brown daybrown.org> wrote:>>> YMMV. 18th century Bengalese Saint Ramprasad said that everything you
>>> see is part of a "projected matrix" out of the mind of the Goddess.
>
>> First of all, it makes no sense for deities to have
>> gender unless they reproduce sexually. If they
>> reproduce sexually, why would there be only one
>> of them (as in _the_ Goddess)? Is she the last
>> of her kind because she killed the rest of them?
>
> There are some animals that dont need sex to reproduce. The Goddess
> likewise has always been regarded as parthenogenic. This is why Athen's
> temple is devoted to "Athena Parthenos", and is named the "Parthenon".
>
>> Against post-partum depression, the Goddesses
>> themselves contend in vain.
>
>>> He also said there are a myriad such worlds. You may, or may not, live ...
|
| Show full article (1.60Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Aug 4, 2008 08:10
On Aug 5, 12:55 am, Shrikeb...@ gmail.com wrote: > On Aug 4, 3:14 am, Day Brown daybrown.org> wrote:
>>>> On Aug 3, 9:30 am, Day Brown daybrown.org> wrote:>>>> YMMV. 18th century Bengalese Saint Ramprasad said that everything you
>>>> see is part of a "projected matrix" out of the mind of the Goddess.
>
>>> First of all, it makes no sense for deities to have
>>> gender unless they reproduce sexually. If they
>>> reproduce sexually, why would there be only one
>>> of them (as in _the_ Goddess)? Is she the last
>>> of her kind because she killed the rest of them?
>
>> There are some animals that dont need sex to reproduce. The Goddess
>> likewise has always been regarded as parthenogenic. This is why Athen's
>> temple is devoted to "Athena Parthenos", and is named the "Parthenon".
>
> Technically, Perthenon just means "of the virgin," or "of the
> virgins". ...
|
| Show full article (2.22Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Day BrownDay Brown Date: Aug 4, 2008 09:30
> Technically, Perthenon just means "of the virgin," or "of the
> virgins".
> There is no genesis in the name. Anyway, you're just dodging Zeus.
> Are you saying that the Goddess is an infinitely old maid? The
> alpha Nun.
See Joseph Campbell; he traces the evolution of the myth. JP Mallory, In
Search of the Indo-Europeans, reports that Aryan warbands didnt show up
until the late bronze age. Partly, this just logistics. You need to be
able to write to inventory the resources, and being able to issue
written orders keeps things organized.
But Campbell is real clear that in the Bronze age there is both a shift
in the cosmology and in the nomenclature. As Thucydides said,
revolutions change the meaning of words. The monotheistic Goddess was
first replaced by a divine couple, which is still seen in some of the
expressions in the Torah, then the female was downgraded and removed
entirely.
|
| Show full article (1.88Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Day BrownDay Brown Date: Aug 4, 2008 09:32
>> Whatever floats your boat. You want an alpha male tyrant god to worship?
>> no problem. The Goddess never was a jealous god.
>
> Because she saw what is, is, and why they called her Isis.
>
> Of course, one of the biggest obstacles for people to cross, is their
> understanding of the difference between masculine/male and feminine/
> female.
>
> What they think is, really isnt.
I just hope all those fools and their misery was not created to make me
feel good.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Aug 4, 2008 18:06
On Aug 5, 2:32 am, Day Brown daybrown.org> wrote:>>> Whatever floats your boat. You want an alpha male tyrant god to worship?
>>> no problem. The Goddess never was a jealous god.
>
>> Because she saw what is, is, and why they called her Isis.
>
>> Of course, one of the biggest obstacles for people to cross, is their
>> understanding of the difference between masculine/male and feminine/
>> female.
>
>> What they think is, really isnt.
>
> I just hope all those fools and their misery was not created to make me
> feel good.
I dont think you were on their mind. We each participate misery to
wake up to the fact we actually have control over our status.
BOfL
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
