| Re: Modern Art abstraction |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: Mani DeliMani Deli Date: Dec 31, 2006 18:42
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 12:02:09 -0500, allUcan@ dontemailme.com (Baker
Mann) wrote:
>In article <1dqfp2hjk5tho16bc9eb78ic0pnlkon5fk@ 4ax.com>, mani@sympatico.ca
>says...
> >>A narrow spectrum ranging from Bauhaus to A&E style abstraction is
>>what is taught in most art schools.
>
>Hey Man!-eeeek! When are you going to get your head
>out of the last century's sands?
Again the Modern Academic Art fundamentalist statement. All artwork
that doesn't conform to Modern Art school precepts is just a repeat of
former times. This is the result of not seeing much more than the crap
in the modern sections of museums and its imitators and never having
the creativity to look elsewhere.
>The rest of the
>art world left Modern Art and AE behind a long time ago.
The art world you are referring to is little more than antiquated Dada
just like AE. The only thing new is the bullshit Artspeak hype. The
real artists for this stuff are the writers, the artwork of almost no
interest.
>You were a bore in the last century, and repeating ad nauseum
>what you had to say then doesn't make it any less boring now.
Happy to bore you etc. As to repeats, I heard your sort of stuff in
art school long ago and ever since. It hasn't really changed. Let's
see your work.
If you take a close look at Modern Art it's plain to see that whatÂ’s
really there isn't what critics have told you to imagine.
| 
