Re: Mirrors and the M.I.N.D. Body Separation
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Mirrors and the M.I.N.D. Body Separation         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: Immortalist
Date: Sep 1, 2008 23:14

On Sep 1, 10:05 am, "Kevin B. Murphy" comcast.net> wrote:
> I've spoken earlier on what might best be described as martial dance. OK,
> Well, if the space where you reside is a sufficiently mirrored space, then
> there are two separate entities residing within that space: M.I.N.D. and
> body. M.I.N.D. and body don't necessarily have to occupy the same space
> within that mirrored space, so it is possible to have a body with the
> M.I.N.D. completely absent.

Varieties of dualism according to which an immaterial mind causally
affects the material body and vice-versa have come under strenuous
attack from different quarters, especially in the 20th century.
Critics of dualism have often asked how something totally immaterial
can affect something totally material. This is the basic problem of
causal interaction...

...it is not clear where the interaction would take place.

...how does the interaction takes place...

Possible replies to the objections;

...it might be possible for mind to influence the distribution of
energy, without altering its quantity...

...Another possibility is to deny that human body is closed system.
Since the principle of conservation of energy applies only to closed
systems, the objection becomes irelevant...

Conclusion? Criticisms of dualism have been very successful in modern
science, and few if any neuroscientists would consider taking such a
position. Scientists commonly assume that only the physical, and thus
measurable, is real. Mental states and processes are viewed as
biological states and processes. Nevertheless, there remains a
practice, invisible but widespread in the social and biological
sciences, in which a logic of dualism persists, and where an
assumption of dualism can be demonstrated.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dualism_(philosophy_of_mind)
> Well, anyways, the reason for going through all
> that was because I wanted to test the hypothesis of there being no science
> left in the world. Technology is not science and everywhere I look what is
> being called science is technology instead. Where did science go? Who took
> it away from us? Well, as near as I can determine, Islamic women have the
> power to make science disappear leaving us with only technology instead. In
> the physical realm, The Triune God is Philosophy, Religion, and Science in
> that order and power is The Kingdom of God. (Mormons are endearing to me at
> many levels but that is not the kingdom of god that I'm refering to.) and
> there is no science and religion dichotomy. So now, Islamic women, could we
> please have our science back? I'm trying to be nice about it.
>
> As much as I may know about the sixth sense, there is a balance that I don't
> have a strong connection with and that would be the type of balance that
> figure scaters typically have. I.C.K.Y.(spinningtops)
> I.C.K.Y.(spinningtops). At first glance and at the very least that appears
> to be very painful but... I think I can warm up to the idea that spinning
> tops function as a means to soften and calibrate my own sense of balance...
> I kind of have to wonder what would happen though if a spinning top and an
> 8x8 grid made intimate contact with each other... It must be true that chess
> players can literally see into the minds of their opponents. The only
> unknown is who is going to quit first.
>
> Concerning life in the trenches: You should never, ever, for an reason tell
> an Aryan nations type that actions speak louder than words. Actions do not
> ever speak louder than words is axiom I'm deeply impregnated with. OK?
>
> --
> Emotion is a sign of weakness. Psychosis is a sign of vulnerability. As a
> society, we nurture weakness and exploit vulnerability and that's OK. It is
> as nature intended.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!