Is it OK for Miami cops to shoot homeless people for sport?

Please post you comments.

Bret Cahill

"Bret Cahill" aol.com> wrote in message
news:b3b8f2a6-8286-4100-900b-fadb5988b771@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

You can shoot any human for sport. The more the better!
Humans shoot innocent lovely animals for sport - so indeed - shoot the
horrible wicked sinning fuckers.
Why not include babies and children - shoot them also for sport.
You could have game of big car and see how many children you can run over.
This very good game.
Then you can watch silly human parents weeping at loss of children - this
very enjoyable.
THE BORG

Bret Cahill schreef:

A rather suggestive question.

Like the question: "Do you still beat your wife?" What answer is
possible? NO? You admit that you did. YES? Well that's an answer.

I think it's called begging the question, meaning here that trough the
way you ask the question you already opt for one possible answer. If
that's not what "begging the question" means you might still know what I
mean.

It's not OK for cops to shoot homeless people. It's not OK if they do so
for sport. It's not OK if Miami cops did so. But if that was what
actually happened? I think you have no clear vision.

On Jul 13, 9:02�pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:

Hell no. Too many cops are ruthless thugs and they always pass the
puck of repsonisbility to someone else like prisons or mental
hospitals. They don't follow up on where their work leads or take
accountability for their actions. They're supposed to defend the
innocent, not lead to their torture or death.

C3

On Jul 13, 9:02 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:

According to the ideology of "tg," there are no
rights outside of those gifted by the State. If
that is true, as long as it were legal, it would be
perfectly OK. In North Korea, it is perfectly okay,
because there is no right to life, if the State
doesn't recognize it.

According to the ideology of "tg," there are no
rights outside of those gifted by the State. If
that is true, as long as it were legal, it would be
perfectly OK. In North Korea, it is perfectly okay,
because there is no right to life, if the State
doesn't recognize it.

=-----=

Well, shitpack, what the hell does 'right' mean in the absence of
recognition? What does right to life mean when you get attacked by a wild
animal in a forest or a thug in the city? "tg" is right, there are no rights
outside of natural endowments and some organized force (the state) to
protect them.

On Jul 14, 5:02 am, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:

No. But when did you stop beating your wife?

For those who do not live in Florida do you not think that providing a
link might be a good idea?

On Jul 14, 5:13 am, "THE BORG" cube.com> wrote:

And would you kill all the lions and tigers because they kill too?

On Jul 14, 8:29 am, Shrikeb...@gmail.com wrote:

But then we don't want to live in a theocracy do we?

It was a national story. The cops were actually prosecuted if I
remember correctly.

Bret Cahill