On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 06:22:50 -0800, doug
xx.com> wrote:
>
>
>George Hammond wrote:
>
>>>
>>>Since there is no god to have a scientific proof of, you
>>>certainly have done nothing.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> Unsupported assertion. Liar.
>
>You do not understand english very well. Even if it were an
>unsupported assertion, that is and assertion, not a lie.
>>
>>
[Hammond]
No, it's an unsupported assertion AND a lie since I have
published the s.p.o.g. in the peer reviewed literature.
>>>
>>>
>>> If you try to work on the
>>>Hindu gods, you have a better chance to try to prove something
>>>since there are a lot more of them.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> Been there done that. The Hindu demigods are merely the
>> 30-1st order eigenvectos of the psychometry correlation
>> matrix as fully proven and detailed in my peer published
>> papers.
>>
>No you just babbled on and are about a few million gods
>short.
>
>
[Hammond]
LIAR there is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that the Hindu's
claim the existence of a "million gods". Cattell's historic
experimental measurement of the 30-1st Order eigenvectors is
a totally scientific explanation of the actual Hindu
pantheon. Liar.
>>>
>>> You badly messed up your
>>>trial at the Greek and Roman gods so you should leave that
>>>alone to avoid further embarrassement.
>>>
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> Pendantic recitation of an unsupported assertion. In fact
>> the Greeko-Roman "Dodekatheon" is STUNNINGLY explained by
>> the fact that they are the 13 SYMMETRY AXES of a cube and
>> therefore CAUSE the 13 cubically intercorrelated 2nd order
>> eigenvectors in Psychometry. Go back to your beer and
>> pizza.
>>
>This was where you tried to tell us that the Greeks and Romans
>were too stupid to know the difference between 12 and 13.
>The correct answer is that they did know and your "explaination"
>is just more meaningless babble.
>
>
[Hammond]
LIAR. The Greeks had no way of knowing the Olympian Gods
originated in the cubic intercorrelation of Cattell's 12-2nd
Order eigenvectors in Psychometry because they didin't
realize they are caused by the cubic structure of the brain
and that the 13 symmetry axes of a simple cube cause 13
Simple Structure eigenvectors in all pychometric correlation
matrices of Personality data. The Greeks were "one god
short", a 7%% error which is typical of ancient scientific
work. They also made a 10%% error in the measurement of the
Earth's diameter from zenith measurements of the Sun... and
even the ancient Heberews misjudged the date of the Biblical
Creation by tens of thousands of years. Liar.
>
>
>>>
>>>>
http://www.issr.org.uk/index.asp
>>>> This is the world's most powerful and elite society for
>>>>Sci-Rel with 200 "elected by nomination only" members. They
>>>>wear out printing presses publishing books about God and
>>>>giving speeches and prizes to each other. They could care
>>>>less is some unknown researcher has actually DISCOVERED the
>>>>world's first s.p.o.g. Sci-Rel is merely an old boy society
>>>>for scientists who have reached their doatage and are now
>>>>allowed to pontificate their private ideology on religion.
>>>> Steve Carlip isa high ranking academic just like these
>>>>people, who do you think you're kidding? It would be just
>>>>as sensible to tell Jesus to go talk to the Sanhedron as it
>>>>is to tell me to talk to Steve Carlip!
>>>>
>>>
>>>He is well thought of and is well aware of the difference
>>>between proof and delusion.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> He's not well thought of by the Young Earth society, or
>> by Creationists. Fact is he's probably just another
>> physicist atheist or agnostic who is hostile to
>> Fundamentalists which doesn't make very well thought of by
>> religious people in general.
>>
>Being disliked by the Young Earth Society is an endorsement
>
[Hammond]
That's you're interpretation. My interpretation is that
they think he's too stupid to figure out what God is or the
Creation is, an opinion they hold of all of atheistic
academia and an opinion which I fully agree with. I was
only trying to wise him up for the sake of not embarressing
the Physics Department any further for instance the way in
which richard Dawkins is embarrassing Oxford.
>
>
>and shows that they think you are too reasonable to believe
>the junk that they are supporting.
>
>
Their amaturish scientific incompetence is completely
EXCUSABLE given the fact that they have now been proven
CORRECT about the absolute SCIENTIFIC VERACITY of the
Biblical Creation, and don't ever forget it. that was my
only message to Steve Carlip, and you.
>>>
