Re: Message from Dick Feynman to Steve Carlip
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Message from Dick Feynman to Steve Carlip         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: doug
Date: Sep 8, 2008 20:41

George Hammond wrote:
> Prefatory note from George Hammond, MS Physics:
>
> Professor Steve Carlip
> Physics Dept, Univ. California
>
> Dear Steve:
>
> I have noticed that you have taken an active part in the
> scientific battle against incompetence in Creationist
> Science. However I have checked your publications and have
> learned that you have a competency liability of your own. To
> wit: A little known American scientist G. Hammond has in
> fact discovered, proven, and published the world's first
> actual scientific proof of God.

It is good to see you bringing your humor back. You, of
course, are sending this to him to give him a good laugh.
He will appreciate it and pass it around if he has not
seen it before. It will be used as an example to the
students of what happens when you do not study.
> I am alarmed that you are apparently not aware of this,
> and in fact that it confirms that the Universe actually WAS
> "created 10,000 years ago"... since according to this proof
> the creation of the (modern) human brain IS IN FACT the
> "creation of reality". So, in fact the "Young Earth"
> creationists are absolutely correct about the date of the
> Biblical Creation, even though (as any scientist can see)
> Creationist Science is a bunch of incompetent hogwash....
> the point is... they DO KNOW intuitively that there is a God
> and intuitively know what it is.... and I have concluded
> from your writings in this area, that you apparently DO NOT
> KNOW whether there is a God or what it is!
> Therefore, as a fellow physicist I have written this
> instructive "dialog" with Dick Feynman in the hopes that it
> will prevent you from bungling the interests of Physics when
> dealing with the more ingenuine elements of Creationist
> Science by BEING AWARE that the Creationists are
> fundamentally correct, even though they are ludicrously
> flawed. You can win battles with them, but according to
> Hammond's discovery, there is no way you can win a war with
> them, and I am alarmed as a physicist that apparently you
> are unaware of this fact!!
> A word to the wise is sufficient they say, and forewarned
> is forearmed! If you don't actually know scientifically
> what God is, you are at severe risk in dealing with people
> who (intuitively) do.. even if they are scientifically
> incompetent!
> I cite in particular your recent demolishment of Robert
> Gentry's cosmology theory. Problem is, even though Gentry's
> theory is obviously wrong.... Gentry IS CORRECT in believing
> that the Universe was created 10,000 years ago... even if he
> doesn't know how or why. Point is, you are apparently
> alarmingly ignorant of the hard scientific fact underlying
> the Biblical Creation, and therefore are setting up Physics
> for a tremendous fall when the Young Earth Creationists find
> out about Hammond's discovery and realize the Biblical
> Creation IS a solid scientific fact, something they have
> suspected and believed all along!
> With Best Wishes,
> George Hammond
> .......................................................
>
> OK then...on with the dramitization:
>
> Imagine that the US Govt. has asked Dick Feynman to talk
> to George Hammond and get to the bottom of his scientific
> claim to have discovered the world's first scientific proof
> of God.... Dick has called Hammond into his office at
> Caltech and here's the way the conversation might go:
>
> FEYNMAN: OK Hammond, the government has asked me to look
> into this scientific proof of God of yours and find out what
> it is. Give me a rundown of how it works.
>
> HAMMOND: Ok Dick, here's the scoop. There's something
> called Psychometry, which is the modern version of
> Psychology... you know, Personality tests, IQ tests, stuff
> like that. They use Factor Analysis on them, which as you
> probably know is just the eigenvector reduction of the
> correlation matrices.
>
> FEYNMAN: Yeah OK, Factor Analysis is used in many Natural
> Science fields to determine what the underlying variables
> are in a given scientific phenomena... it's mainly used when
> you only have statistical correlations between different
> observable variables rather than simple precise mathematical
> equations. The eigenvectors are the coordinate axes of the
> problem.
>
> HAMMOND: Yes, for instance they will form a 100x100
> correlation matrix between all the questions of a
> personality test and then compute the eigenvectors of the
> matrix.
>
> FEYNMAN: What do they get usually when they do this?
>
> HAMMOND: Well, here's the amazing thing. 100 years of
> experimentation has discovered that no matter who writes the
> test, or how many questions there are, the computer always
> finds 4 eigenvectors.
>
> FEYNMAN: You're kidding?
>
> HAMMOND: No... it's unbelievable. The 4 eigenvectors are
> known as E,N,P and g.
>
> FEYNMAN: Well how do they explain that, I mean what would
> cause there to be only 4 dimensions to Psychology?
>
> HAMMOND: That's why I'm here talking to you, I've
> discovered why there are only, exactly, 4 dimensions to
> Psychology.
>
> FEYNMAN: OK, why?
>
> HAMMOND: Turns out they're caused by the 3-axis geometry of
> the brain.
>
> FEYNMAN: What 3-axis geometry, and by the way 3 isn't 4.
>
> HAMMOND: The whole body is an axial quadrature, it comes
> from the first 3 cleavages of the egg. Let me draw you a
> picture on the blackboard, see:
>
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/EMBRYO.jpg
>
> The brain actually has 3 orthogonal cleavages.. you know,
> you've heard of that Sperrian Left-Right brain thing..
> that's one of them.. turns out there are 3 of them in the
> brain. The whole body is like this.. that's why we have 4
> limbs for instance, or why we are bilaterally symmetric.
> BTW, the 4th dimension is simply the time operation of the
> brain, what they call mental speed.
>
> FEYNMAN: Ok, ok.... what does this have to do with a
> scientific proof of God?
>
> HAMMOND: Well, the reason the human body is a 3-axis
> orthogonal machine is because space is Riemanian. The
> quadratic metric of space causes it.
>
> FEYNMAN: Ok.. I see that.. what you're saying is that a
> salt crystal is cubic because the metric of space is a
> quadratic.. sure ok.
>
> HAMMOND: Right, now here's the amazing thing.. it's known
> that there is a curvature in psychometry space, the
> correlation matrix of ENPg is "oblique".
>
> FEYNMAN: Oh no... your not going to tell me that the
> curvature of space causes a curvature of psychometry space
> are you?
>
> HAMMOND: Yep. And guess what Dick... that curvature in
> Psychometry space causes what we call "God".
>
> FEYNMAN: You're kidding... that's crazy... how do you know
> it's God?
>
> HAMMOND: Because they know the Factor produced by this
> curvature is
> caused by "brain growth", specifically, the celebrated
> Secular Trend in human brain growth.
>
> FEYNMAN: Braingrowth causes God? How do you figure that?
>
> HAMMOND: The first clue is that braingrowth causes mental
> speed. We know this since as we grow up, our brain gets
> bigger, and our intelligence increases linearly with age for
> the first 18 years while this happens. Since the curvature
> of the metric indicates that this dilation in mental speed
> is relativistic, this means braingrowth in psychometry space
> is equivalent to the Newtonian potential in real space which
> as we know causes the classic gravitational time dilation.
> "Percent brain growth" in psychometry space is the same
> thing as "mass density" in real space, which is what causes
> curvature.
>
> FEYNMAN: Wait a minute.. first you say the God is caused by
> gravity, then you say it's caused by brain growth... which
> is it?
>
> HAMMOND: Both. Gravity controls braingrowth.
>
> FEYNMAN: How?
>
> HAMMOND: According to Roger Penrose it's quantum gravity in
> the brain.
>
> FEYNMAN: Well.. that's just a theory.
>
> HAMMOND: True... but as you can see, this thing is a
> scientific explanation of God without even mentioning the
> word gravity. The existence of the Secular Trend in
> braingrowth, and the known perceptual phenomena of
> braingrowth is sufficient to explain God. Not only that,
> since we KNOW that the 4 metrical dimensions of spacetime
> cause the 4 metrical dimensions of Psychometry, that means
> "axiomatically" that there is only one single final Factor
> in Psychometry. Those 3 facts together are sufficient to
> prove that the Factor is God, without even mentioning the
> word Gravity. The connection to Gravity is just the frosting
> on the cake, obviously.
>
> FEYNMAN: Ok, Ok so apparently there is a curvature of
> "subjective" spacetime caused by braingrowth (or lack
> ofbraingrowth) but you still haven't explained why this
> curvature has to be "God"... couldn't it be something
> else... like mental retardation or something.... after all
> there is no scientific definition of God?
>
> HAMMOND: Na, the evidence is conclusive that simple lack of
> braingrowth causes "God". In lieu of a scientific
> definition of God we simply take the 15 leading phenomena of
> God and Religion and show that the discovery conclusively
> explains every one of them. For instance:
>
> The SPOG scientifically and quantitatively explains the
> following 16 (central and comprehensive) items which
> characterize Religion:
>
> 1. Why there physically exists an "invisible world"
> known as "Heaven" which is similar to Earth but
> is a paradise.
> (Because the Growth Deficit reduces mental
> speed and thus reduces the Fourier cutoff
> frequency of visual movement) This can be
> easily measured directly by the Motion Picture
> Fusion Frequency, which increases directly with
> gross brain growth). Hence explains the
> "invisible world" of Religion.
> 2. Why God is an "invisible man" who lives there
> and is all powerful and rules the actual (visible)
> world from there.
> ("God" is the perfect fully grown man, hence the
> part of us that is latent, or ungrown, is called
> the "invisible God", also the "Unconscious mind")
> 3. Why this God can effect miracles which transcend
> the (known) laws of Physics.
> (Because, a change in Repression causes a
> dramatic change in Curvature of subjective
> spacetime suddenly making more of reality
> visible).
> 4. Why Jesus said "God is a spirit" Jn 4:24
> (This is confirmed by the SPOG which shows that
> "God" is the unconscious mind, which is a
> "spirit")
> 5. Why historically Religion has evolved from
> Polytheism to Monotheism.
> (The SPOG proves that there are 4 orders of
> eigenvectors, which is a "hierarchy of gods".
> the entire history of Religion is accounted for
> as a successive discovery of the orders from
> 1st=(demigods), 2nd=(12 Olympian gods), 3rd=
> (4-Gospel Saints), 4th=(God of Monotheism)
> 6. Why Christianity says the world is transforming
> itself into Heaven and will actually complete this
> at a date known as "Kingdom Come"... or the
> "end of the world".
> (Because the Secular Trend curve in Human
> Growth is a Sigmoidal Logistics curve (S-curve)
> and the final plateau is 100%% growth of
> the individual, or "Kingdom Come")
> 7. Why there is such a thing as "Eternal Life".
> (Because full growth means flat subjective
> spacetime.. no time dilation.. aka eternal time)
> 8. Why it is believed that Jesus was the physical
> "incarnation of God"
> (Because, nominally Jesus was a "fully grown
> specimen". Of course we know this wasn't
> actually possible, but in fact he must have
> been an impressive specimen to conduct
> such a startling public ministry.)
> 9. Why the Cross for some reason is the central
> symbol of (Western) Religion.
> (Because the human body is an "axial quadrature"
> and the brain actually "cubic" causing a cross
> structure (Cartesian structure) of Personality)
> 10. Why for some reason our main canonical text is
> written in 4 identical versions known as the
> "4-Gospel Canon".
> (Because the Structural Model is CUBIC,
> represented as a square; 4 Gospel Canon
> represents the 4 canonical personalities
> of Man... cf. the Bicameral/2 Party system)
> 11. How God "created the world" only a matter of
> "thousands" of years ago (Genesis) not "billions"
> of years ago (Big Bang) as Science believes.
> (Because subjective spacetime only came into
> being when Man came into being 200,000 years
> ago, causing the Biblical Creation).
> 12. Why God created man "in his own image".
> (Because God is the invisible (fully grown)
> version of Man).
> 13. Why there is a "Trinity of God" and what it is,
> functionally or scientifically speaking.
> (the Trinity is simply the cybernetic feedback
> loop (input, output, feedback) describing the
> operation of the Father (invisible man), Son
> actual Man, and feedback (UNCS mind) that
> transforms the latter into the former).
> 14. Why there are (nominally) 13 gods in the
> Egypto-Greco-Roman pantheon.
> (Because the 2nd orders are caused by the
> cubic str. of the brain and a cube has exactly
> 13 symmetry axes!).
> 15. Why there are exactly 4-gospel Saints named
> Matthew, mark, Luke, John.
> (Because the Cubic str. of Personality can be
> represented by a section through the Cube,
> yielding the 4 canonical personalities of Man)
> 16. Why there are 30 odd "lesser demigods" in Hinduism.
> (Because there are 30 1st-order eigenvectors
> caused by myriad lower level brain structures;
> not geometrically intercorrelated)
> 17 The list goes on!
>
>
> FEYNMAN: By George I think you've got something, it
> probably is the scientific explanation of God. That means
> Einstein actually discovered the mathematical proof of God
> when he discovered relativity!
>
> HAMMOND: No kidding sir!
>
> =====================================
> SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
> mirror site:
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
> http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
> =====================================
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!