|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Bret CahillBret Cahill Date: May 22, 2008 10:52
And this is just a poll. The spread between what whites tell
pollsters and how they vote is up to 10 points larger.
The fact that the jingoistic corp. media keep "merely omitting" this
fact is proof enough they want the U.S. in Iraq for another 4 years.
This also makes it obvious that Limbaugh supporters were voting for
Obama in open primaries. Rightards are dumb but they know that
Clinton is the real enemy of rightardism.
Bret Cahill
> WASHINGTON (AFP) - Republican John McCain leads Barack Obama in two
> presidential swing states, as some of Hillary Clinton's core supporters shun
> the Democratic front-runner, polls showed Thursday...
|
| Show full article (2.17Kb) |
|
| | 21 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Anonymous Infidel - the anti-political talking headAnonymous Infidel - the anti-political talking head Date: May 22, 2008 11:04
> The fact that the jingoistic corp. media keep "merely omitting" this
> fact is proof enough they want the U.S. in Iraq for another 4 years.
We were going to be anyways. Obama never was going to remove US
troops(see link below). [Just another one of his BS lies]
>
> This also makes it obvious that Limbaugh supporters were voting for
> Obama in open primaries.
No, it's clear that both Republicans and Democrats were willing to
give Obama a shot....That was until they found out what he really was
about(Wright, Rezco, University of Chicago Hospitals, Exelon
Corporation, Maytag, etc).
You're right about one thing...if Hillary doesn't get the nod then
McCain is going to be the President.
-----------
BooHooHooObama is a fucking liar:
http://www.slickbarry.com/
That aims to be the next Rumsfeld:
http://tinyurl.com/5v9sgf
|
| Show full article (0.99Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: tgtg Date: May 22, 2008 11:10
On May 22, 1:52 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
> And this is just a poll. The spread between what whites tell
> pollsters and how they vote is up to 10 points larger.
>
> The fact that the jingoistic corp. media keep "merely omitting" this
> fact is proof enough they want the U.S. in Iraq for another 4 years.
>
> This also makes it obvious that Limbaugh supporters were voting for
> Obama in open primaries. Rightards are dumb but they know that
> Clinton is the real enemy of rightardism.
>
Still bitter after all these years, eh Bret?
Face it---this is the old "John Kerry saved my live in 'Nam and then
he donated a kidney to save my kid's life and gave me the money to buy
a house........buuuuuuuuut.........since he wore that neoprene suit
windsurfing I just can't vote for him scam.
|
| Show full article (3.29Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: Bret CahillBret Cahill Date: May 22, 2008 11:27
> You're right about one thing...if Hillary doesn't get the nod then
> McCain is going to be the President.
That isn't 100%% certain. I'm a staunch Clinton supporter and the
Clintons should _own_ the Democratic Party if Obama is nominated and
loses to McBush, but 3 things make even a weak Democrat like Obama a
possible contender:
1. The economy will only get worse. McBush's tax cuts for the rich
have been discredited.
2. McBush is even weaker than Obama. McCain won't be as competent at
bottom fishing the bigot vote as other Repugs. McCain can't even get
the GOP's rightard base vote.
3. GOP is probably going the way of the Conservatives in Canada or
the Tories in the UK. Complete ablation. In that case the Democratic
Party will need to split in half to preserve the 2 party system.
Another little discussed but plausible scenario:
McCain gets elected and Pelosi gets a veto proof majority in 2010.
Most of the troops will be home or redeployed by 2011.
Bret Cahill
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Bret CahillBret Cahill Date: May 22, 2008 11:35
>> The fact that the jingoistic corp. media keep "merely omitting" this
>> fact is proof enough they want the U.S. in Iraq for another 4 years.
> We were going to be anyways.
Unless we start looting the oil fields, we just won't be able to
afford it.
Telling Americans that there is no short term [10 - 20 year] solution
to spiraling energy costs is like Rhett Butler trying to tell the
Southern plantation owners that their cause was lost from the git go.
> Obama never was going to remove US
> troops(see link below).
Even if he's elected, Obama will be very weak.
Chalk another victory up for the corp. media.
. . .
>> This also makes it obvious that Limbaugh supporters were voting for
>> Obama in open primaries.
> No, it's clear that both Republicans and Democrats were willing to
> give Obama a shot....
At losing.
|
| Show full article (1.25Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Date: May 22, 2008 17:58
On Thu, 22 May 2008 11:27:22 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
>... I'm a staunch Clinton supporter ...
You like the Bush terrorism spree that much?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Bret CahillBret Cahill Date: May 22, 2008 20:18
Ever notice how neocon media pundits and Obama supporters want Hillary
out ASAP?
There's a reason for this.
> Face it---this is the old "John Kerry saved my live in 'Nam and then
> he donated a kidney to save my kid's life and gave me the money to buy
> a house........buuuuuuuuut.........since he wore that neoprene suit
> windsurfing I just can't vote for him scam.
So you agree, Obama is another Kerry.
Another jingoistic media pump and dump who can easily be swiftboated
(after Hillary is gone) to keep the U. S. in Iraq another 4 years.
Bret Cahill
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: zinniczinnic Date: May 22, 2008 21:49
On May 22, 1:27 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
>> You're right about one thing...if Hillary doesn't get the nod then
>> McCain is going to be the President.
>
> That isn't 100%% certain. I'm a staunch Clinton supporter and the
> Clintons should _own_ the Democratic Party if Obama is nominated and
> loses to McBush,
Cannot you see that your obsession with a Clinton royalty has been
resoundingly rejected by the democratic majority? Hillbillary Clinton
claims overwhelming support from populations that still need to
validate themselves by virtue of their being more related to albinos
than to our melanin-advantaged citizens. That is Racism.
Overwhelming support of Obama by blacks? That is Racism!
Overwhelming support of Clinton by older womem. That is Sexism.
This racism and...
|
| Show full article (1.96Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Bret CahillBret Cahill Date: May 22, 2008 21:59
>>> You're right about one thing...if Hillary doesn't get the nod then
>>> McCain is going to be the President.
>
>> That isn't 100%% certain. �I'm a staunch Clinton supporter and the
>> Clintons should _own_ the Democratic Party if Obama is nominated and
>> loses to McBush,
> Cannot you see that your obsession with a Clinton royalty
The Clintons are populists.
> has been
> resoundingly rejected by the democratic majority?
Where? In small redneck states which will go to McBush?
. . .
>> McCain can't even get
>> the GOP's rightard base vote.
> �As opposed to the bottom-dwelling bigots that you and Hillbillary
> depend on in the KKK states?
Black family income increased faster under the high tax Clinton
economic boom than anytime since the Emancipation Proclamation.
|
| Show full article (1.44Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: zinniczinnic Date: May 22, 2008 22:47
On May 22, 11:59 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:
>>>> You're right about one thing...if Hillary doesn't get the nod then
>>>> McCain is going to be the President.
>
>>> That isn't 100%% certain. �I'm a staunch Clinton supporter and the
>>> Clintons should _own_ the Democratic Party if Obama is nominated and
>>> loses to McBush,
>> Cannot you see that your obsession with a Clinton royalty
>
.>
>> has been
>> resoundingly rejected by the democratic majority?
>
> Where? In small redneck states which will go to McBush?
>
> . . .
>
>>> McCain can't even get
>>> the GOP's rightard base vote.
>> �As opposed to the bottom-dwelling bigots that you and Hillbillary ...
|
| Show full article (1.82Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
  |
|
|
|
|
|