Luke O Farrell on the James Watson Race Row
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Luke O Farrell on the James Watson Race Row         


Author: maidenmerch
Date: Nov 9, 2007 09:21

http://www.heretical.com/ofarrell/brain.html

Brain of Terror
A Procrustean Thesis Awaits Its Theseus

There is only one language - the human language. Vile linguistic
bigots may try to pretend that English, Chinese and Navajo are somehow
separate "languages", but they merely reveal their own ignorance and
stupidity. Far more unites these three meaning-delivery systems than
divides them. They all use vowels and consonants, they all have ways
of referring to the past, present and future, of expressing negation
and hypothesis, of capturing the world and its complexities. The
differences between meaning-delivery systems are so small, the
similarities so vast, that we can reach only one conclusion: Language
does not exist. And if you claim you can't understand Chinese or
Navajo or Maori, you're obviously a dangerous bigot in serious need of
a decade or two in an arctic re-education camp.

Well, separate languages do exist, of course, just as separate
races do. The analogy between language and race isn't perfect, but
it's illuminating all the same. Some people claim that race is a false...
Show full article (13.75Kb)
2 Comments
Re: Luke O Farrell on the James Watson Race Row         


Date: Nov 9, 2007 13:25

On Nov 9, 12:21 pm, "maidenme...@googlemail.com"
googlemail.com> wrote:
> http://www.heretical.com/ofarrell/brain.html
>
> Brain of Terror
> A Procrustean Thesis Awaits Its Theseus
>
> There is only one language - the human language. Vile linguistic
> bigots may try to pretend that English, Chinese and Navajo are somehow
> separate "languages", but they merely reveal their own ignorance and
> stupidity. Far more unites these three meaning-delivery systems than
> divides them. They all use vowels and consonants, they all have ways
> of referring to the past, present and future, of expressing negation
> and hypothesis, of capturing the world and its complexities. The
> differences between meaning-delivery systems are so small, the
> similarities so vast, that we can reach only one conclusion: Language
> does not exist. And if you claim you can't understand Chinese or
> Navajo or Maori, you're obviously a dangerous bigot in serious need of
> a decade or two in an arctic re-education camp.
> ...
Show full article (15.74Kb)
no comments
Re: Luke O Farrell on the James Watson Race Row         


Author: Immortalist
Date: Nov 9, 2007 20:39

>
>> LUKE O'FARRELL
>> P.S. Please note new email address.
>
>
> I'm afraid your comparison is gibberish (sorry could not avoid the
> pun). However, your comparison has flaws. Language is a man made
> construct the codifies as set of sounds and symbols to represent
> certain meanings. As such language is in a constant state of flux.
> That is to say we can define a language (or some sub-set of a
> language) to mean anything we want. As long as the communicator and
> the communicatee both understand the "code" being used then that
> language is useful.
>
Show full article (2.33Kb)
no comments