I read somewhere, nuclie collide with each other to produce nuclear
reaction the same way as chemical reaction occurs.

Chemical Reaction

H+H -> H2

O+O ->O2

2H2 + O2 -> 2H2O

Simmilarly Nuclear Reaction occur.

H1+H1 -> He {fusion}

U238 -> U235 {fission}

When Universe begain everything was hydrogen. Hydrogen collided with
each other to bring Helium.

Then these elements collided to bring larger elements. Like Li, B,
Carbon etc.

At even higher temprature they collide to give Iron, Aluminum & Gold.

Can someone tell me where can I get list of all such nuclear
Reactions.

Along with at what temprature these reactions take place.

And is it possible for Iron nucle to fuse together to give even higher
Elements? And where in our universe these reactions take place.

Sanny wrote:

Stellar nucleosynthesis is all over the Web, including a Nobel Prize.
Google is your friend. Pull your thumb out and look it up.

If the product has a larger binding energy than its reacting
constituents summed then product formation is thermodynamically
allowed. Doesn't mean it's gonna happen. Hexamethlprismane C6(CH3)6
is 90 kcal/mole above hexamethylbenzene, C6(CH3)6. It must be heated
to add another 33 kcal/mole before it rearranges. C-C single bond
strength is 83 kcal/mole. The molecule must be literally shattered
before it heads downhill.

Thermodyamics proposes, kinetics disposes.

You're not a very nice person, are you Uncle Al???

Does your erudition in physics give you some elevated sense of worth
over the poor laymen struggling to learn some truths about the
universe he or she inhabits????

Is there some compelling compulsion you are afflicted with that
prevents you from passing knowledge to these lesser beings in a more
constructive way???

Are you related to Mike Gordge????

The preceding were all rhetorical questions, Uncle Al, from one not-
very-nice-person (but I'm workin' on it) to another. I'm only seeing
your "intellectually stimulating responses" when they get cross-posted
to alt.P; this forum **already** has an arrogant, pedantic, dogmatic,
condescending, insensitive misanthrope. If the position ever opens up,
I'll let you know.................

K e v

PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS POST. IT WILL NEVER BE READ.

On Oct 29, 2:33 pm, kevirwin comcast.net> wrote:

All fucking lies, typical wanking agnostic dopey as all fuck knuckle-
dragging leftist retard.

MG

On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:33:28 -0700, kevirwin comcast.net>
wrote:

On Oct 29, 3:30 am, Michael Gray newsguy.com> wrote:

I already **admitted** to NOT being very nice, but I do tend to limit
my opprobrium, invectives, pejoratives, slurs, epitaphs, vituperative
denunciations, vile & vulgar rebukes to those individuals where it
appears merited and appropriate. (of course it's subjective!!)

But then, you might disagree; I'm ok with that..

Excuse me, I have to read up on physics,
K e v

On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 04:33:09 -0700, kevirwin comcast.net>
wrote:

You write *a lot* of missives to yourself?

On Oct 29, 11:37 am, Al Klein wrote:

Well Mr. Al,

You wrote that witless retort because:

(A) you're really Uncle Al under another uninspired alias

(B) you have developed an unnatural affinity to persons named "Al"

(C) your rejoinder passes for high wit on science forums and atheist's
forums

(D) you missed my veiled reference to the unnecessary ad hominems
Uncle Al loosed upon an unsuspecting seeker of knowledge

(E) you wished to engage in verbal sparring in an arena where you're
the under dog

(F) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (write-in)

If it's (E), sorry...I'm not interested, I like a challenge...
I studied intelligence a long time ago; I'm in the top 2%%. I just
don't give a fuck about physics, nor the endless atheist-theist
arguments.

My view (added unnecessarily) on scientific method/discovery:

kevirwin wrote:

[snip whining crap]

Either answer the question or don't post. I posted the answer, the
nuclear mass and binding energy interactive database. What did you
post? You posted a lot of high school whiningg crap. Oh boo hoo hoo -
give him the answer and suck his dick for good measure.

Stupidity *should* be lethal.

Well, idiot? Why don't your repost the URl for the nuclear mass and
binding energy interactive database? Are you too stooopid to copy
from a crib sheet? If so, you are in good company,

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/immig.htm

On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:53:12 -0700, kevirwin comcast.net>
wrote:

What a load of utter bullshit!
You are an ignoramus on the subject.
You have libelled two sincere and earnest posters.
(With no more reason than that they have the letter string "Al" in
their handles)