Limitations of thinking
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Limitations of thinking         


Author: bigfletch8
Date: Jul 31, 2008 16:35

We used to look into the heavens, and thought we saw what 'is', but
because of the scientific understanding of light, we now know are
looking at what was. Logically just follow the light back to the
source , then "voila".Greater mysteries are discovered

So much for large scale thinking.

Apply that to the images around you. They are all in the past also.

Only the observer is present.

See what I mean?

BOfL
13 Comments
Re: Limitations of thinking         


Author: T-minus108
Date: Jul 31, 2008 16:53

On Jul 31, 7:35 pm, "bigflet...@gmail.com" gmail.com>
wrote:
> We used to look into the heavens, and thought we saw what 'is', but
> because of the scientific understanding of light, we now know are
> looking at what was. Logically just follow the light back to the
> source , then "voila".Greater mysteries are discovered
>
> So much for large scale thinking.
>
> Apply that to the images around you. They are all in the past also.
>
> Only the observer is present.
>
> See what I mean?
>
> BOfL
Show full article (0.81Kb)
no comments
Re: Limitations of thinking         


Author: Immortalist
Date: Jul 31, 2008 17:05

On Jul 31, 4:53 pm, T-minus108 gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 31, 7:35 pm, "bigflet...@gmail.com" gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> We used to look into the heavens, and thought we saw what 'is', but
>> because of the scientific understanding of light, we now know are
>> looking at what was. Logically just follow the light back to the
>> source , then "voila".Greater mysteries are discovered
>
>> So much for large scale thinking.
>
>> Apply that to the images around you. They are all in the past also.
>
>> Only the observer is present.
>
>> See what I mean?
>
>> BOfL
>
> Everything is in the past if you're using a very miniscule scale of ...
Show full article (2.54Kb)
no comments
Re: Limitations of thinking         


Author: Sir Frederick
Date: Jul 31, 2008 17:14

On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:35:51 -0700 (PDT), "bigfletch8@gmail.com"
gmail.com> wrote:
Show full article (0.76Kb)
no comments
Re: Limitations of thinking         


Author: T-minus108
Date: Jul 31, 2008 18:07

On Jul 31, 8:14 pm, Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:
> Would you raise your fridge up a bit, so as to satisfy
> some cockroaches?

Do cockroaches see us as god?

Cockroaches can outlive humans through pretty much anything, but I've
never heard anyone say they can outlive god.
no comments
Re: Limitations of thinking         


Author: Sir Frederick
Date: Jul 31, 2008 18:30

On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:07:18 -0700 (PDT), T-minus108 gmail.com> wrote:
>On Jul 31, 8:14 pm, Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:
>> Would you raise your fridge up a bit, so as to satisfy
>> some cockroaches?
>
>Do cockroaches see us as god?
>
>Cockroaches can outlive humans through pretty much anything, but I've
>never heard anyone say they can outlive god.

What does "outliving" have to do with the issue?
The cockroaches are our biological siblings,
far closer than any putative gods.
Get the cockroaches to practice more than simple stories
and they are closer still.
The hubris humans support does a lot of damage to our
perception of "reality".
no comments
Re: Limitations of thinking         


Author: T-minus108
Date: Jul 31, 2008 18:37

On Jul 31, 9:30 pm, Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:
> What does "outliving" have to do with the issue?

To be honest, nothing. The thought just came to me and I typed it. :)
> The cockroaches are our biological siblings,
> far closer than any putative gods.
> Get the cockroaches to practice more than simple stories
> and they are closer still.

Agreed.
> The hubris humans support does a lot of damage to our
> perception of "reality".

I don't know what you mean... I've never heard of the hubris humans
thing.
no comments
Re: Limitations of thinking         


Author: Pop Fly
Date: Jul 31, 2008 18:46

On Jul 31, 8:05 pm, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 31, 4:53 pm, T-minus108 gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Jul 31, 7:35 pm, "bigflet...@gmail.com" gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>
>>> We used to look into the heavens, and thought we saw what 'is', but
>>> because of the scientific understanding of light, we now know are
>>> looking at what was. Logically just follow the light back to the
>>> source , then "voila".Greater mysteries are discovered
>
>>> So much for large scale thinking.
>
>>> Apply that to the images around you. They are all in the past also.
>
>>> Only the observer is present. ...
Show full article (3.66Kb)
no comments
Re: Limitations of thinking         


Author: Pop Fly
Date: Jul 31, 2008 18:47

On Jul 31, 9:07 pm, T-minus108 gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 31, 8:14 pm, Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:
>
>> Would you raise your fridge up a bit, so as to satisfy
>> some cockroaches?
>
> Do cockroaches see us as god?
>
> Cockroaches can outlive humans through pretty much anything, but I've
> never heard anyone say they can outlive god.

Except, of course, Nietzsche ;-)
no comments
Re: Limitations of thinking         


Author: Immortalist
Date: Jul 31, 2008 19:09

On Jul 31, 6:46 pm, Pop Fly gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 31, 8:05 pm, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jul 31, 4:53 pm, T-minus108 gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> On Jul 31, 7:35 pm, "bigflet...@gmail.com" gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>
>>>> We used to look into the heavens, and thought we saw what 'is', but
>>>> because of the scientific understanding of light, we now know are
>>>> looking at what was. Logically just follow the light back to the
>>>> source , then "voila".Greater mysteries are discovered
>
>>>> So much for large scale thinking.
>
>>>> Apply that to the images around you. They are all in the past also.
>
>>>> Only the observer is present. ...
Show full article (4.25Kb)
no comments
1 2