"Robert Cohen"
msn.com> wrote in message
news:8b38e9be-51d9-4664-9137-c3cd73d23f03@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 17, 9:53 pm, Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote:
> On Sep 17, 8:52 pm, Fred Weiss papertig.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Sep 17, 9:31 am, Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote:
>
>>> Theoretical Functions of Fannie & Freddie: To establish standards,
>>> criteria for qualifications of loans, packages for securitizing
>>> mortgage loans for investors, resales, STANDARDIZATION, facilitation
>
>> I thought it was to help those who don't qualify and couldn't get
>> mortgages - and to offer guarantees to banks to offer such
>> (unjustified) loans. Banks had also separately been under considerable
>> pressure to offer mortgages to unqualified applicants.
>
>> This is a legacy of the New Deal under your hero, FDR.
>
>>> ... mortgage brokers get their half percent (or whatever the
>>> commission) if the buyer is a bad risk or good risk
>
>> Isn't this precisely what gov't policy encouraged? Add to that
>> flooding the market with easy credit in order to keep interest rates
>> low.
>
>> When I say something which is not in accord with "New Deal" philosophy
>> you let me know.
>
>>> If the the processes are flawed (nothing is foolproof), then one can
>>> bet that flaws will be exploited by humans intent on getting their
>>> interests, percentage, commission, fee. pay, graft, feathering their
>>> own nest
>
>> Banks as a rule don't exist to loan money to people who are poor
>> risks. So why do you think that is precisely what they've done in
>> recent years?
>
>> Fred Weiss
>
> re: HUD, FHA, VA, FANNIE, FREDDIE etal
>
> As I interpret your point of view
>
> Real estate loaning-facilitating is simply not a federal govt
> function
>
> Okay, I think I get your message
>
> I can't argue with that kind of absolutist rationale
>
> You're allowed to believe whatever you want
>
> I'm not going to challenge your reactionary-regressive ideological--
> idealistic & romantic--
> convictions
>
> I live here and now in the real world such as it is
>
> If you could tell me of a libertarian actual model, or of an
> Objectivist actual model, or even an unfettered marketplace today or
> in history any time or location, then ...
>
> I am pragmatist enough to go for what works- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
This is for Fred, Sean, "Strike" guy, and all
re: How the clashings of rational self-interests can bring down the
Temple on everybody if there is incompetence and/or dishonesty in the
cement mixing
A social contract or constitution attempts to define the social
poltical economic order, the culture
Laws are based upon "good" and "bad" as interpreted by humans,
legislators, judges and executive administrators, whom are afterall
ultimately chosen by "the people"
Various individuals' self-interests are not inherently harmonious
Re: Govt regulation/interference in the marketplace is mixed blessing
When ENRON collapsed & bankrupted, thousands of its employees felt
cheated/bamboozled/victimized
So Congress regulates corporations through more corporate financial
disclosures, and yet the Oxley-Sarbannes Reform has also SUPPOSEDLY
caused the mega-complicated corporation nightmare problems in their
complex more open balance sheeting
Re: Repotedly: How Inconsistency by Private Raters (S&P, Fitch,
Moody's) SUPPOSEDLY Really F'd Up The Banquet
Reportedly S&P, Fitch, and Moody's rated the securitized mortgage
paper etal (CDOs: what in the the h are they? ) as generally high.
Reportedly the rating private agencies didn't realize/calculate/allow
for the inherent dishonesties involved in the (sometimes) phony as a 3
dollar bill mortgage process, and the mortgages were accepted as safe
risk investments
Re: Catch 22 a la Sarbanes-Oxley: Reportedly S&P and Moody's NOW rate
the brokerage houses as shakey-risky situations since they peddled
sometimes now admittedly highly risky paper
Dylan & Maria acutely questiond the head ratings guy about this
contradictory phenomenon today on CNBC financial tv.
The head ratings guy said his raters do their jobs and his company is
not responsible for consequences
My opinion: Thus, lawsuits ad nauseam ad infinitum about the whole
unblessed rigamarole
Did I mention the important g greed word?
Wall Steet brokers do not make money when there is "no sale"
Their reason-to-be or method is to sell, sell, sell
Whether they know the paper is partly soiled or not, they don't make
money if they can't peddle it
The brokerages are paying for their greed today: They're paying out
billions to the customers/clients
who've been cheated/bamboozled
And no wonder the brokerages are being given low ratings/low
confidence
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sean:
Robert, I'm with you here 100%%, it is an accurate way of putting the core of
the issue.
The Law exist for a reason. Crooked people always try to get around the Law.
What's more important than the Law, is the "spirit of the Law" and that is
contained in the combined good will of the People, for the People , by the
People.
The people have an inherent right to fuck over or jail, or destroy other
people who consciously subvert the Rule of Law for their own self interest,
and the defrauding of others.
The rights of the individual, against all comers be they other individuals,
companies banks, or the bleeding gevernment is what the "decl of Ind and the
Constitutuion" = The Law, is actually all about. It's a balancing of the
powers subsistant in THE People.
When the People speak, the crooks better listen or move overseas. The
repeated chnaging of the Laws "after the event" which repeated Repubs and
Demos have been doing for decades is insuffient.
REAL CHANGE is required. NOW is an opportunity.
Forgive the debts ........... and start again. The real Capital in the USA,
is in fact The People and it's Labour .... not the rich or the criminally
inclined greedy cock suckers who have been revered in Wall Street way too
long.
Greenspan and The Fed Board should be jailed, or at least sent personally
bankrupt, that would send the RIGHT signal.
Thanks for you comments etc in the thread. You're on the "money" imho.