|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Gary ChildressGary Childress Date: May 31, 2008 16:33
Wow! Doped up on anti-psychotics and anti-depressants, the world is
so much better. But every now and then a faint glimmer of "care"
interrupts and spoils the tranquility.
Which is better; consciousness, or lack of it? Which is worse?
Living on meds must be the existential equivalent of driving under the
influence. But living without meds seems impossible for me, lest I
join the ranks of the homeless.
Ah choices, choices...
|
| |
|
| | 6 Comments |
|
|
Author: THE BORGTHE BORG Date: May 31, 2008 17:05
> Wow! Doped up on anti-psychotics and anti-depressants, the world is
> so much better. But every now and then a faint glimmer of "care"
> interrupts and spoils the tranquility.
>
> Which is better; consciousness, or lack of it? Which is worse?
>
> Living on meds must be the existential equivalent of driving under the
> influence. But living without meds seems impossible for me, lest I
> join the ranks of the homeless.
>
> Ah choices, choices...
>
Care is a beautiful thing.
Care for animals and creatures. Care for each other. Care for the world
you live in.
Humans know fuck all about care.
|
| Show full article (1.53Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Gary ChildressGary Childress Date: May 31, 2008 17:07
On May 31, 8:05 pm, "THE BORG" cube.co.uk> wrote:>> Wow! Doped up on anti-psychotics and anti-depressants, the world is
>> so much better. But every now and then a faint glimmer of "care"
>> interrupts and spoils the tranquility.
>
>> Which is better; consciousness, or lack of it? Which is worse?
>
>> Living on meds must be the existential equivalent of driving under the
>> influence. But living without meds seems impossible for me, lest I
>> join the ranks of the homeless.
>
>> Ah choices, choices...
>
> Care is a beautiful thing.
> Care for animals and creatures. Care for each other. Care for the world
> you live in. ...
|
| Show full article (1.66Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: May 31, 2008 17:53
On Jun 1, 9:33 am, Gary Childress aol.com> wrote:> Wow! Doped up on anti-psychotics and anti-depressants, the world is
> so much better. But every now and then a faint glimmer of "care"
> interrupts and spoils the tranquility.
>
> Which is better; consciousness, or lack of it? Which is worse?
>
> Living on meds must be the existential equivalent of driving under the
> influence. But living without meds seems impossible for me, lest I
> join the ranks of the homeless.
>
> Ah choices, choices...
There is no choice regarding consciousness. Every step in life assures
that fact. Not taking is a step, as is taking.
There is a 'hell' of a difference between taking for so called
recreational as opposed to medical reasons. The same illustration
applies to food. What keeps you alive and sustains you, can make life
hell and kill you, particularly regarding your real home...ie body.
|
| Show full article (1.01Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: May 31, 2008 17:55
On Jun 1, 10:07 am, Gary Childress aol.com> wrote:> On May 31, 8:05 pm, "THE BORG" cube.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> "Gary Childress" aol.com> wrote in message>
>
>>> Wow! Doped up on anti-psychotics and anti-depressants, the world is
>>> so much better. But every now and then a faint glimmer of "care"
>>> interrupts and spoils the tranquility.
>
>>> Which is better; consciousness, or lack of it? Which is worse?
>
>>> Living on meds must be the existential equivalent of driving under the
>>> influence. But living without meds seems impossible for me, lest I
>>> join the ranks of the homeless. ...
|
| Show full article (1.95Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: THE BORGTHE BORG Date: May 31, 2008 18:11
gmail.com> wrote in message
news:26dc49d8-86bd-47d3-b18c-e9f76aabae78@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 1, 9:33 am, Gary Childress aol.com> wrote:
> Wow! Doped up on anti-psychotics and anti-depressants, the world is
> so much better. But every now and then a faint glimmer of "care"
> interrupts and spoils the tranquility.
>
> Which is better; consciousness, or lack of it? Which is worse?
>
> Living on meds must be the existential equivalent of driving under the
> influence. But living without meds seems impossible for me, lest I
> join the ranks of the homeless.
>
> Ah choices, choices...
There is no choice regarding consciousness. Every step in life assures
that fact. Not taking is a step, as is taking.
|
| Show full article (3.57Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: May 31, 2008 21:12
On May 31, 4:33 pm, Gary Childress aol.com> wrote:> Wow! Doped up on anti-psychotics and anti-depressants, the world is
> so much better. But every now and then a faint glimmer of "care"
> interrupts and spoils the tranquility.
>
> Which is better; consciousness, or lack of it? Which is worse?
>
> Living on meds must be the existential equivalent of driving under the
> influence. But living without meds seems impossible for me, lest I
> join the ranks of the homeless.
>
> Ah choices, choices...
Before meds all there was was therapy, I remember therapy just about
figured out how to help one gain control over the thinking process
that we let go weak. Weak, I mean we are lazy thinkers and just let
the consequencial moods rll right over us and rape us. Now they got
meds without strong and healthy thing habits. Once the meds wear off,
the wussy lazy boy comes back into the sloppy american thought process
spurred on by advertizingering..
|
| Show full article (7.40Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
