> "Jurisdictionary" jurisdictionary.com> wrote in message

>> In my more than 22 years of practice as a full-time
>> lawyer in Florida, it was my experience that more
>> than half the lawyers I ran into didn't have a clue
>> about the simple processes it takes...

> Yet its nice to know that the theory you've been promoting here the last
> few days and claimed was your own was really plagarized and stolen from
> someone else. �

> In article
> <089688b2-27ab-4d01-a146-ae1118d2bc27@u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
> BretCahill@peoplepc.com wrote:
>

>

>> Once I based a federal appeals brief on J. S. Bach's d-minor fugue and
>> had the judges cheering, but just for the record, I don't use any
>> special pyrotechnics anymore.

>
> I'm sure it was a break from the normal legalese they read. But I'm
> also sure it played no part in whether you won or lost.

>> Bret Cahill

>> Yet its nice to know that the theory you've been promoting here the last
>> few days and claimed was your own was really plagarized and stolen from
>> someone else. �

>
> I came to the same conclusion independently before he said it.
>
> Just now I'm reminded of what the chief judge of the 11 th said:
>
> "Maybe you'll teach the lawyers here a thing or two."
>
> That was at least two years earlier than the conflict of interest
> discovery.
>
>
> Bret Cahill

> I'm sure none of it actually happended.

>>> Yet its nice to know that the theory you've been promoting here the last
>>> few days and claimed was your own was really plagarized and stolen from
>>> someone else. ?

>> I came to the same conclusion independently �before he said it.

> Sure you did. �Or so you now say, having tripped yourself up.

>

>> "Ha ha ha ha ha ha! If you _ever_ tell a judge you had 'two beers'
>> you'll lose. If you say 'three beers' you'll win. If you say 'one
>> beer' you'll win. But the judge is sick and tired of hearing people
>> say 'two beers.'"

>
> What insight. It's common knowledge among law enforcement - when a
> drunk driver is stopped, the overwhelming majority of the time they
> claim to have had "two beers" - knowing they're too drunk for one to
> sound believeable, but thinking two is a low enough number to be
> reasonable and not get them in trouble.
>
> Did you really think that was a profound nugget of legal wisdom, Bret?
>

>> I'm sure none of it actually happended.

>
> Things happendes all the time.

> Bret Cahill

>>>> Yet its nice to know that the theory you've been promoting here
>>>> the last
>>>> few days and claimed was your own was really plagarized and
>>>> stolen from someone else. ?

>

>>> I came to the same conclusion independently �before he said it.

>

>> Sure you did. �Or so you now say, having tripped yourself up.

>
> I keep meticulous records. I can prove it in court.

> Bret Cahill

> In article
> <6aeb8c66-094f-417b-b577-e27096d6bf39@j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
> BretCahill@peoplepc.com wrote:
>

>>> I'm sure none of it actually happended.

>>
>> Things happendes all the time.

>
> You provided a specific anecdote that Deadrat thinks you made up. He
> asked for names, dates, places, and the like, which instead of
> providing, you claim "Things happendes all the time." Without even
> asking what "happenedes" means, no one asked about general things that
> happen all the time.
>
> You were asked for specifics of your story, and got exposed as a liar by
> your response.