Re: Latest PC Madness
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Latest PC Madness         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: TruthSlave
Date: May 11, 2008 04:05

Sir Frederick wrote:
> Latest PC Madness: British Airways takes beef off the menu to avoid
> offending Hindus
> http://tinyurl.com/6nyvqh
>
> For decades the national dish has been a staple meal on the national
> carrier.
>
> But now British Airways has taken beef off the menu for economy
> passengers amid concerns about its "religious restrictions".
>
> The airline has instead switched to a fish pie or chicken dish option
> for the so-called "cattle class" passengers.
>
> BA's second-biggest long-haul market is to India, where the majority
> Hindu population do not eat beef because of their beliefs.
>
> The decision to scrap the nation's favourite fare was described as a
> "great shame" by the English Beef and Lamb Executive, formerly part of
> the Meat and Livestock Commission.
>
> A spokesman said: "It is regrettable that Britain's flag carrier is not
> proposing to serve Britain's national dish.
>
> "It is a meal we are rightly proud of. Roast beef and beefeaters are
> symbols or Britain used to promote tourism.
>
> "Our beef is also much in demand overseas. It is predominately grass fed
> and highly praised for its flavour.
>
> "It is obviously up to British Airways to decide what they serve on
> flights, but beef is an ideal meat for making into airline meals." A BA
> spokesman said the it stopped serving beef to economy class passengers
> last month.
>
> He added: "We can only serve two options and beef and pork obviously
> have religious restrictions.
>
> "We have to try to use two meals which appeal to as many customers as
> possible. This summer season we are offering customers in World
> Traveller on most longhaul flights a choice of chicken and tarragon or
> fish pie.
>
> "We also look at trends from major supermarkets to see what types of
> meals are popular and fish pie style meals are selling well at the moment.
>
> "These two meals proved popular in tasting tests and are also proving
> popular on board.
>
> "It has nothing to do with the fear of causing offence - we always offer
> alternative meals for people with special dietary requirements if they
> order in advance.
>
> "We are still serving beef based meals on certain menus in First Class
> and Club World and are currently deciding on whether or not to use beef
> on the menus for World Traveller customers for the winter season."
>
> The Hindu Council UK said: "The Hindu community will welcome this
> decision and the news it has been made partly because Hindus don't eat beef.
>
> "Hindus have a great deal of respect for British culture and are well
> integrated into the British way of life, so it's good to see evidence of
> how they are literally flying the British flag by choosing British Airways.
>
> "That said, Hindus are tolerant of the beliefs of others and do not
> expect everyone to stop eating a food because they do not eat it."
>
> In the past three months world beef prices have risen from about £2,500
> a tonne to more than £4,000 a tonne, largely because of the weakening
> dollar and rising feed costs.
>
> BA also said that cost is not a reason for the decision to stop serving
> beef.
>
>

Whenever i see these provocatively worded PC articles, i have to
shake my head.

Is it really PC to satisfy the market? Or offer, what the consumer
is prepared to buy? If the economy class was dominated by ye-oldie
Beef eaters, i am sure BA would continue to pander to that market.
Clearly its changes are made on economic grounds.

PC as a label is suppose to be blinding, the anti-banner to fuel
senseless reactions to the mere suggestion of its title.

Yeah - 'In my day it was so much better when the little guy had
no voice, did as he was told, suffered as he was suppose to'.

What right has Modernity with its obedience to numbers, to curtail
choice in the name of greater profits? There again maybe PC and
economics are inter-dependents and we aren't suppose to see the
rules which connect them, just accept the way the one is used
to exploit the other.

Its just a matter of time before the PC spotlight is turned on
Christianity. Roaring loudly the latest king of the Jungle -

'Wasn't that Christ fellow one of those bleeding hearts?
A namby pamby, PC liberals? Can we really afford his
conscience, his wishy washy values?'

There is a point here on the way meaning is defined by use.
The label PC is not used to promote PC. The label apparently
only exist to group and thus condemn, a longstanding trend of
modernity. Its not so much PC, as the anti-PC. All of which
says something about the absence of labels for the unnamed.

The fact that it use the absurd to make its point, seems some
how lost in its meaning. PC an experiment in language, thought
and control, now lost on the succeeding generation.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!