Re: Knowledge is not Power
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Knowledge is not Power         

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: jjs
Date: Sep 10, 2008 10:03

"Jerry Kraus" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d2d077a7-7556-44f5-bffb-d7ea38d04b58@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 10, 10:17 am, student13 gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 10, 7:54 pm, Jerry Kraus yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Sep 10, 7:35 am, John J wrote:
>
>>> Jerry Kraus wrote:
>>>> On Sep 8, 6:02 am, ZerkonX X.net> wrote:
>>>>> Knowledge has no power without action. Ignorance in action has
>>>>> power.
>>>>> Knowledge alone yields nothing without act.
>
>>>>> It is Action or Process that is power not knowledge.
>
>>>> Like most truisms, the phrase "knowledge is power" is an
>>>> exaggeration,
>>>> or oversimplification, intended to make a point. Knowledge is very
>>>> useful, and without knowledge, power is often limited and self-
>>>> destructive.
>
>>> In your earlier posts you proposed that scientific research should be
>>> constrained to limits you would impose. IOW, you wish for the power to
>>> limit research. Your knowledge of scientific research is highly
>>> limited.
>>> So one can conclude it suits you to turn things backwards based upon
>>> ...
>>> what? The weather? A roll of dice? One of those goofy 8-Ball things
>>> that
>>> pops up random answers? Imagine a fascist model of the same. Horrors!
>>> The trains will run on time.... but to nowhere you want to go.
>
>> Not at all. In my other posts, I propose that professional scientists
>> should be held accountable for doing work of value, and not just
>> whatever they feel like, including, and often, absolutely nothing
>> other than feathering their own nests.
>
> very interesting.
>
> Today, when the scientists started carrying out the Bigbang experiment
> - costing over 5 billion and may be over 15 years
> some one asked, is it worth ?
>
> The scientist replied that when maxwell (?) explained electo-
> magnetism, neither he nor the people around him
> at that time thought about its utility. Over a period scientists
> became Knowledgeable - more and more knowledgeable
> on its use.
>
> that is growth.
>
> remember even in those days Issac Newton had the courage to tell the
> world that
> when some one invent or discover something, the world more often does
> not remember that
> it is done standing on the shoulders of so many others.
>
> enjoy
> cheers
> st13- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

| A very convenient argument for justifying doing whatever one wishes,
| at all times. And attacking anyone who questions you.

This has become Kraus Dueling with Kraus. Not very interesting, nor
profitable, nor valuable.

| Scientists need to be held accountable, just like all other
| individuals.

I guess we should all report in to Jerry Kraus. I'll begin. I work under
State and Federal grants. I do very well. Tell you what, Kraus, you call
them and make your case. That might be a path to action. Typing here does no
good at all.

BTW - Your posts are being collected for a study of logic.Yours make the
null case.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!