> On Mar 16, 8:18 pm, "-Phil Clemence" wrote:
>
>
>
>>
xtra.co.nz> wrote in message>
>
>>> On Mar 16, 11:49 am, "-Phil Clemence" wrote:
>
>>>> Wanker?
>>>> I hoped here we could rise above crude name calling.
>>>> I think wankist is more appropriate.
>
>>> It is not surprising to seeee ewes two have hit it off wif each uva,
>>> ewes 2 ewes make a gw8 couple, ewes deserve each uva chazzzzzz,
>>> congratulations on finding another mindless commie knuckle-draggin
>>> fuckwit to share your bed of stupidity wif, you do know that Phil is
>>> as uncertain about his uncertainty as you aren't or are, dont ewe
>>> chazzz?
>
>>> MG
>
>> I still am not sure where you stand.
>
> That's not surprising of coure, you've already told the world many
> times that you're not sure of everything, chazzzzz is 99.99999%% sure
> that hes unsure leeeeee says he's 99.999999999%% that he's unsure,
> where do you stand? Oh thats right you cant answer that exactly, do
> you think they were? oh no thats right they cant be.
>
> MG
>
> MG
Oi oi Mickey boy,
Now letys not take Leeesss name in vain huh, ya know I'm pretty sure
that there is a commandment about that somewhere!
