Molesworth wrote:
> In article ,
> Tim Howard suddenlink.net> wrote:
>
>>> On Oct 13, 12:03 am, Tim Howard suddenlink.net> wrote:
>>>>> Jurors Weep At Diana Crash Scene
>>>>> (Conspiracy Nation, 10/11/07) - On Monday, members of the Diana
>>>>> inquest jury wept at the scene of the Princess's fatal August 1997 car
>>>>> crash. ("Tears As Jurors See Diana Crash Scene," by Richard Palmer and
>>>>> Jo Willey. Daily Express (U.K.), October 9, 2007)
>>>> This is how paranoid we have become. Even though Diana was killed right
>>>> in the middle of a huge city for everyone to see, and who was involved
>>>> and how it happened were clear, still a few conspiracy theory nuts come
>>>> up with alternative ideas and enough people believe it to the point
>>>> there is an inquest. And for whom? A princess, a pop-culture icon.
>>>> It's not as if she was an important head of state. But this conspiracy
>>>> cannot be blamed only on the "Diana Cult", as Journalist Alexander
>>>> Cockburn termed it shortly after her demise. No, societies in America
>>>> and Europe (perhaps all over the world for all I know) have become
>>>> paranoid to the point that some people will not believe even the most
>>>> strait-forward and obvious explanations for anything.
>>> Lady Diana was killed because of a drunk driver
>>> ( Henri Paul ). Now all who loved her and cry for her understand how
>>> the Copechne family & friends felt when Teddy killed Mary Jo . There
>>> was no jury to cry for her !!
>>>
>> Who the hell are they/he/she?
>
> Scroogle 'Mary Jo Kopechne'
>
OMG I am embarrassed that I did not remember her name right away,
follower of American politics that I am. Be that as it may, what do
those two events have in common? Why should anyone in Britain care
about the Kopechne family, especially after all these years?