> On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:01:04 -0700 (PDT), Shrikeb...@gmail.com wrote:

>>On Aug 14, 10:06 am, Patriot Games America.Com> wrote:

>>> On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:17:00 +0000, ZerkonX X.net> wrote:

>>>>On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:52:20 -0700, Immortalist wrote:

>>>>> (08-12) 17:25 PDT SAN FRANCISCO -- A federal judge says the University
>>>>> of California can deny course credit to applicants from Christian high
>>>>> schools whose textbooks declare the Bible infallible and reject
>>>>> evolution.

>>>>Might be better to first give them the credit and see how they test out.

>>> World Socialism (Obama's and the Democrat's goal) can't work if
>>> Christianity is popular.

>>Horseshit.  They call it liberation theology.

>
> Name a country where Christianity is the dominant religion that is
> also Socialist.

>

>>Also note
>>that Jim Jones' ideolgoy was both socialist and Christian.

>
> Pretty irrelevant given that he was INSANE.
>

>>> That's why the Blue State Democrats have been oppressing Christianity
>>> and moving to ban it.

>>Paranoid much?

>
> Nope.  Just realistic.
>

>>>>> "if (scientific) conclusions contradict the Word of God, the
>>>>> conclusions are wrong,"

>>>>I see no reasonable way this abyss can be bridged. The burden of
>>>>religious specifics (THE WORD) which might pertain to each subject matter
>>>>should not be placed on a public institution.

>>> Then the people who believe in that should NOT have to pay taxes to
>>> support the public institution.

>>So Jehovah's Witnesses shouldn't have to pay taxes to
>>support any public institution with a flag on it.

>
> Why do Socialist Democrats and Losers ALWAYS try to change the
> Subject?
>

>>>>A person who maintains that 'a word' trumps accepted science, should look
>>>>elsewhere for their general education.  

>>> And they should NOT have to PAY taxes to support a general education
>>> they disagree with.

>>They can always move to Saudi Arabia or Iran.

>
> Or they could take up arms against their oppressors and send them back
> to God.
>
> http://www.pollingreport.com/religion.htm
> Gallup Poll. May 10-13, 2007. "For each of the following items I am
> going to read you, please tell me whether it is something you believe
> in, something you're not sure about, or something you don't believe
> in. . . ."
> Believe In God: 86%%
> Don't Believe In God: 6%%
> Not Sure: 8%%
>
> "Which of the following statements comes closest to your belief about
> God: you believe in God, you don't believe in God but you do believe
> in a universal spirit or higher power, or you don't believe in
> either?"
> Believe in God: 78%%
> Believe in Universal Spirit/Higher Power: 14%%
> Neither: 7%%
>
> "Which of the following statements comes closest to describing your
> views about the Bible? The Bible is the actual word of God and is to
> be taken literally, word for word. The Bible is the inspired word of
> God, but not everything in it should be taken literally. OR, The Bible
> is an ancient book of fables, legends, history, and moral precepts
> recorded by man."
> Actual Word of God: 28%%
> Inspired Word of God: 49%%
> Fables: 19%%
> I'm Stupid: 3%%
>
> CBS News Poll. April 6-9, 2006. "Do you agree or disagree with the
> following statement: The Bible is the actual word of God and is to be
> taken literally, word for word."
> Agree: 43%%
> Disagree: 54%%
> I'm Stupid: 3%%