> On Nov 23, 7:57 pm, Topaz hotmail.com> wrote:
>

>> Jews are the biggest problem

>
> Go deeper, irrationalism is at the core of Jewism, just as
> irrationalism is at the core of socialism, communism, treehuggizzzm,
> earthmotherizzzzm, manmakestheglobehotizzzzm, anglicanism,
> catholicizzzmmm, fascizzm tribalismmm.
>
> MG

> because, as somebody claims: freedom is relative, not an absolute

> as far as i know, there is no "absolute free speech" in the

>as far as i know, there is no "absolute free speech" in the world;
>though you may clue-moi-in where it is absolute besides hyde park, but
>are they allowed to be nude (nudism is sort of political) there?
>
>because, as somebody claims: freedom is relative, not an absolute
>
>i am thinking if fromm were similarly advocating witchcraft, burmese
>fascism, north korean communism, radicalism etal, then do ya think he
>would be kicked by the ontario teachers board too?

> On Nov 24, 2:03 am, Robert Cohen msn.com> wrote:
>

>> as far as i know, there is no "absolute free speech" in the

>
> Since when does a dopey preceding adjective change the meaning of
> speaking without fear?
>
> MG

> Please cite any civilization existing now and/or in world history in
> which speech is unlimited,

> Liberating America From Israel
>
> by Paul Findley
>
> Nine-eleven would not have occurred if the U.S. government had refused
> to help Israel humiliate and destroy Palestinian society. Few express
> this conclusion publicly, but many believe it is the truth. I believe
> the catastrophe could have been prevented if any U.S. president during
> the past 35 years had had the courage and wisdom to suspend all U.S.
> aid until Israel withdrew from the Arab land seized in the 1967
> Arab-Israeli war.
>
> The U.S. lobby for Israel is powerful and intimidating, but any
> determined president-even President Bush this very day-could prevail
> and win overwhelming public support for the suspension of aid by
> laying these facts before the American people:
>
> Israel's present government, like its predecessors, is determined to
> annex the West Bank-biblical Judea and Samaria - so Israel will become ...

>> because, as somebody claims: freedom is relative, not an absolute

>
> A Hitler, Stalin or Saddam would be perfectly free to censor anything
> under _that_ vague interpretation of free speech.

> Please cite any civilization existing now and/or in world history in
> which speech is unlimited, and/or that allows the yelling of a false
> "fire" in a crowded theatre