Re: It's apparently better to just die.
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Re: It's apparently better to just die.         


Author: V
Date: Jan 15, 2008 16:54

On Jan 15, 6:49�pm, athe...@home.com wrote:
> Ridiculous and worse than offensive.
> They own us.
>
> Supreme Court Lets Stand Experimental-Drug Ruling
> By Robert Barnes
> Washington Post Staff Writer
> Tuesday, January 15, 2008; Page A02
> The Supreme Court yesterday declined to consider whether dying
> patients have a right to be treated with experimental drugs not yet
> approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
> The court, without comment or recorded dissent, let stand a ruling by
> the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which said the
> terminally ill have no constitutional right to drugs the agency
> considers safe enough only for additional testing.
> The challenge was brought by the Washington Legal Foundation and the
> Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs.
> The alliance is headed by Frank Burroughs of Fredericksburg and named
> in honor of his daughter, Abigail Burroughs, who was diagnosed at 19
> and died at 21 of a form of cancer rare in someone her age. ...
Show full article (18.71Kb)
5 Comments
Re: It's apparently better to just die.         


Author: atheist
Date: Jan 15, 2008 18:54

On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:54:36 -0800 (PST), V aol.com> wrote:
>On Jan 15, 6:49?pm, athe...@home.com wrote:
>> Ridiculous and worse than offensive.
>> They own us.
>>
>> Supreme Court Lets Stand Experimental-Drug Ruling
>> By Robert Barnes
>> Washington Post Staff...
Show full article (2.12Kb)
no comments
Re: It's apparently better to just die.         


Author: Malrassic Park
Date: Jan 15, 2008 19:31

On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:54:47 -0600, atheist@home.com wrote:
>>I'm sure you will think that when the crude and NG runs dry.
>>
>>The world is in a death spiral and politicians as well as industry are
>>pretending this problem does not exist. We can only blame ourselves,
>>for it is just how we have built our world over the years....too many
>>people, living outside of natures intended balance and not an infinite
>>supply of energy to fuel all our demands.

Define "nature's intended balance." If man did not violate "nature's
intended balance," would he be living in tepees and yurts?
no comments
Re: It's apparently better to just die.         


Author: Bret Cahill
Date: Jan 15, 2008 20:26

> We will all be dead and long gone before the world runs out of oil.

The price will be so high in less than one generation that very few
people will be able to afford to burn it in SUVs.

Al Gore will be able to fly around in Lear jets, however.

Gore made most of his money _after_ his two concession speeches.

Bret Cahill
no comments
Re: It's apparently better to just die.         


Author: Bret Cahill
Date: Jan 15, 2008 20:28

>> Ridiculous and worse than offensive.
>> They own us.
>
>> Supreme Court Lets Stand Experimental-Drug Ruling
>> By Robert Barnes
>> Washington Post Staff Writer
>> Tuesday, January 15, 2008; Page A02
>> The Supreme Court yesterday declined to consider whether dying
>> patients have a right to be treated with experimental drugs not yet
>> approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
>> The court, without comment or recorded dissent, let stand a ruling by
>> the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which said the
>> terminally ill have no constitutional right to drugs the agency
>> considers safe enough only for additional testing.
>> The challenge was brought by the Washington Legal Foundation and the
>> Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs.
>> The alliance is headed by Frank Burroughs of Fredericksburg and named
>> in honor of his daughter, Abigail Burroughs, who was diagnosed at 19
>> and died at 21 of a form of cancer rare in someone her age.
>> The young woman died in 2001, and the drug she was seeking was later ...
Show full article (1.36Kb)
no comments
Re: It's apparently better to just die.         


Author: Immortalist
Date: Jan 15, 2008 20:50

On Jan 15, 7:31 pm, Malrassic Park hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:54:47 -0600, athe...@home.com wrote:
>>>I'm sure you will think that when the crude and NG runs dry.
>
>>>The world is in a death spiral and politicians as well as industry are
>>>pretending this problem does not exist. We can only blame ourselves,
>>>for it is just how we have built our world over the years....too many
>>>people, living outside of natures intended balance and not an infinite
>>>supply of energy to fuel all our demands.
>
> Define "nature's intended balance." If man did not violate "nature's
> intended balance," would he be living in tepees and yurts?

Maybe replace "nature's intended balance" with "range of human
interactions with the environment that allow life to continue
generally"
no comments