| Re: Is there any possibility that 250.000 eye-witnesses be ALL wrong? |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: Rev Dr Feit C TajRev Dr Feit C Taj Date: Sep 20, 2008 10:49
Aardvark wrote in
news:9gaBk.74110$RJ3.1983@newsfe10.ams2:
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:22:18 -0700, Zapanaz wrote:
>
>>>> Yes, that's how to solve the world's problems; imagine an
>>>> invisible man who lives in the sky, then ask him to fix them.
>>>
>>>Go to Google and do a search for 'Descartes' Wager'. You'll probably
>>>find a Wikipedia article about the subject. Read and digest the
>>>article.
>>
>> No.
>>
>> If you have something to say, say it. I'm not going to dig around on
>> Google and Wikipedia, trying to guess what your point is. If you
>> can't present the concept the wager represents yourself, I'm not
>> going to do your work for you.
>
> Remain wilfully ignorant, then.
>
>
>
I did do a search for "Descartes' Wager", just for shits and giggles.
Guess how many results I found?
Zero.
If you're gonna blither on about bullshit, at least know what you're
talking about, and get the fucking name right.
| 
