| Re: Is there any possibility that 250.000 eye-witnesses be ALL wrong? |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: SODDISODDI Date: Sep 20, 2008 10:17
"Aardvark" wrote in message
news:9gaBk.74110$RJ3.1983@newsfe10.ams2...> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:22:18 -0700, Zapanaz wrote:
>
>>>> Yes, that's how to solve the world's problems; imagine an invisible
>>>> man who lives in the sky, then ask him to fix them.
>>>
>>>Go to Google and do a search for 'Descartes' Wager'. You'll probably
>>>find a Wikipedia article about the subject. Read and digest the article.
>>
>> No.
>>
>> If you have something to say, say it. I'm not going to dig around on
>> Google and Wikipedia, trying to guess what your point is. If you can't
>> present the concept the wager represents yourself, I'm not going to do
>> your work for you.
>
> Remain wilfully ignorant, then.
Can't you read? "If you have something to say, say it. I'm not going to dig
around on
Google and Wikipedia, trying to guess what your point is. If you can't
present the concept the wager represents yourself, I'm not going to do your
work for you."
Not "ignorant" - just sick of people who paste links instead of making their
own points.
And if you can't succinctly paraphrase Descartes' Wager, you have no
business referring to it.
| 
