| Re: Is the statement "If 2+2=5 then 1+1=2" true |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile
Author: herbzetherbzet Date: Apr 16, 2008 23:27
Tron wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> "herbzet" gmail.com> skrev i melding
> news:4802D754.11E07717@gmail.com...>>
>> Well, alright then, but may I suggest that some further _rigor_
>> fist into palm> in distinguishing concepts such as "being able to avoid
>> paradox" and "being self-enclosed" and "allowing a certain degree of
>> certainty" etc. would be helpful?
>
> Hey, "rigor" is practically Mortie's middle name.
> Are we at such a level that the effort to avoid _every possible abiguity_
> will pay off?
> Should we get there, hey, I'm your rigger man. So far I think we doin good
> on this level.
I was a rigger and flyman for the world premier of "The Secret Garden",
which went on to run for a couple of years on Broadway.
Riggers know the ropes.
--
hz
| 
