Is my reasoning correct? no lame comments, please
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
Is my reasoning correct? no lame comments, please         


Author: awais.nazir.ch
Date: May 26, 2008 08:01

INTRODUCTION:

I was skeptical about the existence of God, but no more now.

SECULAR EVIDENCE:

That proto-DNA/RNA/PNA/TNA/GNA, which emerged about 4 billion years
ago, as fossil records indicate, has to meet the following 4
conditions, (1) ALL OF THEM (2) SIMULTANEOUSLY AND (3) WITHIN ONE
GENERATION (only God can do this), or the proto-DNA/RNA/PNA/TNA/GNA is
dead (ref: en.wikipedia.com):

-different organic compounds joined in exact helical order.
-have a complete reproductive system.
-have a complete DNA/RNA/PNA/TNA/GNA-repair system.
-have a complete metabolic system.

Chimps are 98.8%% human, not because humans evolved out of proto-chimp,
but because humans share biological functions with Chimps more than
any other living thing.

Evolution is "theory", not a proved "law".

Famous Scientist Crick proposed that the proto-DNA/RNA couldn't have
developed on Earth, but must have come from the space; but this
doesn't solve the problem, about the origin of the proto-DNA/RNA.
Show full article (4.50Kb)
12 Comments
Re: Is my reasoning correct? no lame comments, please         


Author: Pink Freud
Date: May 26, 2008 08:04

No.

--

----------------------------------------------------------
Pink Freud, Dark Side Of The Couch
----------------------------------------------------------
"When I die, I want to pass away peacefully in my sleep, like my uncle
Derek, and not crying and screaming, like the passengers in his car."
no comments
Re: Is my reasoning correct? no lame comments, please         


Author: raven1
Date: May 26, 2008 08:42

On Mon, 26 May 2008 08:01:02 -0700 (PDT), awais.nazir.ch@gmail.com
wrote:
>INTRODUCTION:
>
>I was skeptical about the existence of God,

I'm *extremely* skeptical of that statement.
Show full article (2.09Kb)
no comments
Re: Is my reasoning correct?------------> SPAM         


Author: Ken
Date: May 26, 2008 08:50

Dude....Anymore of this X-posted crap and you will be reported to
Google and your ISP as a spammer
no comments
Re: Is my reasoning correct? no lame comments, please         


Author: Daniel T.
Date: May 26, 2008 09:09

Yet again, you ignore every response you have received and re-post the
same tired argument without any changes. You know that saying over and
over again doesn't make it true don't you?

[plonk]
no comments
Re: Is my reasoning correct? no lame comments, please         


Author: Immortalist
Date: May 26, 2008 09:13

On May 26, 8:01 am, awais.nazir...@gmail.com wrote:
> INTRODUCTION:
>
> I was skeptical about the existence of God,  but no more now.
>
> SECULAR EVIDENCE:
>
> That proto-DNA/RNA/PNA/TNA/GNA, which emerged about 4 billion years
> ago, as fossil records indicate, has to meet the following 4
> conditions, (1) ALL OF THEM (2) SIMULTANEOUSLY AND (3) WITHIN ONE
> GENERATION (only God can do this), or the proto-DNA/RNA/PNA/TNA/GNA is
> dead (ref: en.wikipedia.com):
>
> -different organic compounds joined in exact helical order.
> -have a complete reproductive system.
> -have a complete DNA/RNA/PNA/TNA/GNA-repair system.
> -have a complete metabolic system.
>
> Chimps are 98.8%% human, not because humans evolved out of proto-chimp,
> but because humans share biological functions with Chimps more than ...
Show full article (1.95Kb)
no comments
Re: Is my reasoning correct? no lame comments, please         


Author: John Baker
Date: May 26, 2008 09:26

On Mon, 26 May 2008 08:01:02 -0700 (PDT), awais.nazir.ch@gmail.com
wrote:

Your reasoning is nonexistent.
no comments
Re: Is my reasoning correct? no lame comments, please         


Author: Thurisaz, Germanic barbarian
Date: May 26, 2008 10:08

Okay. You first.
> Evolution is "theory", not a proved "law".

You just lost.

--
"To his friend a man a friend shall prove, and gifts with gifts requite;
But men shall mocking with mockery answer, and fraud with falsehood meet."
(The Poetic Edda)
Must have been written with fundies in mind...

My personal judgment of monotheism:
http://www.carcosa.de/nojebus
no comments
Re: Is my reasoning correct? no lame comments, please         


Author: panamfloyd
Date: May 26, 2008 10:55

On May 26, 11:01 am, awais.nazir...@gmail.com wrote:

snip crap

Hey, if you don't want lame comments, stop posting lame "arguments".

-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
no comments
Re: Is my reasoning correct?------------> SPAM         


Author: panamfloyd
Date: May 26, 2008 10:57

On May 26, 11:50 am, Ken aol.com> wrote:
> Dude....Anymore of this X-posted crap and you will be reported to
> Google and your ISP as a spammer

What's up with all the new Muzzie spammers, anyway? Aren't they
supposed to avoid pork?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_(food)

-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
no comments
1 2