|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: ZerkonXZerkonX Date: May 24, 2008 04:44
On Fri, 23 May 2008 18:18:43 -0700, animalishness wrote:
> charles murray who has long argued that there are innate differences in
> IQ among the races. there have been articles in Commentary, National
> Review, American Conservative, American Spectator, and others that
> weighed in matters of innate racial differences.
Look here.
Human beings haven't the knowledge much less the understanding to know
what IQ means. All tests carry a unintended and/or intended bias of their
designers. It is impossible to totally eradicate this.
IQ's of the urbanized are higher than rural people is another favorite
flag. This opens up a whole new aspect on the race/IQ business.
Given any Human group of two or above there will be differences. They are
seen only because the similarities are so overwhelming.
In the US, Europe and other parts of the world this topic should be
regarded as nothing more than flame-bait. No matter what magazine, TV
show, scientist, or radio squawker tells us. It is an impractical issue
in this day in age.
|
| |
|
| | 4 Comments |
|
|
Author: animalishnessanimalishness Date: May 24, 2008 15:06
On May 24, 6:44 am, ZerkonX X.net> wrote:> On Fri, 23 May 2008 18:18:43 -0700, animalishness wrote:
>> charles murray who has long argued that there are innate differences in
>> IQ among the races. there have been articles in Commentary, National
>> Review, American Conservative, American Spectator, and others that
>> weighed in matters of innate racial differences.
>
> Look here.
>
> Human beings haven't the knowledge much less the understanding to know
> what IQ means. All tests carry a unintended and/or intended bias of their
> designers. It is impossible to totally eradicate this.
>
> IQ's of the urbanized are higher than rural people is another favorite
> flag. This opens up a whole new aspect on the race/IQ business.
>
> Given any Human group of two or above there will be differences. They are
> seen only because the similarities are so overwhelming.
>
> In the US, Europe and other parts of the world this topic should be ...
|
| Show full article (1.24Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: BabsBabs Date: May 24, 2008 21:23
On May 24, 6:06 pm, animalishness live.com> wrote:> On May 24, 6:44 am, ZerkonX X.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> On Fri, 23 May 2008 18:18:43 -0700, animalishness wrote:
>>> charles murray who has long argued that there are innate differences in
>>> IQ among the races. there have been articles in Commentary, National
>>> Review, American Conservative, American Spectator, and others that
>>> weighed in matters of innate racial differences.
>
>> Look here.
>
>> Human beings haven't the knowledge much less the understanding to know
>> what IQ means. All tests carry a unintended and/or intended bias of their
>> designers. It is impossible to totally eradicate this.
>
>> IQ's of the urbanized are higher than rural people is another favorite
>> flag. This opens up a whole new aspect on the race/IQ business.
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.40Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: turtoniturtoni Date: May 24, 2008 21:53
> don't be so politically correct. the simple fact is einstein would
> score higher on an IQ exam than forrest gump.
>> babs:
>> But Forrest Gump had that box of chocolates!
And he could run like the wind!
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Don PhillipsonDon Phillipson Date: May 25, 2008 11:54
> On Fri, 23 May 2008 18:18:43 -0700, animalishness wrote:
>> charles murray who has long argued that there are innate differences in
>> IQ among the races. there have been articles in Commentary, National
>> Review, American Conservative, American Spectator, and others that
>> weighed in matters of innate racial differences.
On May 24, 6:44 am, ZerkonX X.net> wrote:
>> Human beings haven't the knowledge much less the understanding to know
>> what IQ means. All tests carry a unintended and/or intended bias of their
>>designers. It is impossible to totally eradicate this.
>> . . .
>> In the US, Europe and other parts of the world this topic should be
>> regarded as nothing more than flame-bait. No matter what magazine, TV
>> show, scientist, or radio squawker tells us. It is an impractical issue
>> in this day in age.
> don't be so politically correct. the simple fact is einstein would
> score higher on an IQ exam than forrest gump.
|
| Show full article (1.60Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
