intelligence
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
intelligence         


Author: rscan
Date: Mar 30, 2008 16:45

If we are to discuss intelligence, we must first make our peace with
the relationship between body and soul. Some, of course, are not aware
that there is a problem. Let them be happy in their ignorance. Do not
disturb.

Others are aware of a pseudo-problem that they lay to a poor choice of
words, a misuse of language. They tend to be very, very clever. They
turn on a spigot, and a rush of words befogs the question.

Soul (spirit, essence, psyche, mind, consciousness, awareness,
intelligence, intellect, mentality, self, individuality, persona,
personality, conscious mental field, self awareness, sentience,
executive function).

All these words imply an uneasiness with soul. All these words imply
an object, or something approaching an object. Something we might
carry about in a watch pocket and take out for display at an
appropriate time.

Such a diarrhea of the mouth. There is no talking to them. They have
surrounded themselves with such a fortress of words that they cannot
hear.

---- ---
Show full article (2.64Kb)
15 Comments
Re: intelligence         


Author: brian fletcher
Date: Mar 30, 2008 17:14

nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:f93b8a94-7c1a-4c5f-be3c-d9066a337b70@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> If we are to discuss intelligence, we must first make our peace with
> the relationship between body and soul. Some, of course, are not aware
> that there is a problem. Let them be happy in their ignorance. Do not
> disturb.
>
> Others are aware of a pseudo-problem that they lay to a poor choice of
> words, a misuse of language. They tend to be very, very clever. They
> turn on a spigot, and a rush of words befogs the question.
>
> Soul (spirit, essence, psyche, mind, consciousness, awareness,
> intelligence, intellect, mentality, self, individuality, persona,
> personality, conscious mental field, self awareness, sentience,
> executive function).
>
> All these words imply an uneasiness with soul. All these words imply
> an object, or something approaching an object. Something we might
> carry about in a watch pocket and take out for display at an
> appropriate time. ...
Show full article (3.45Kb)
no comments
Re: intelligence         


Author: turtoni
Date: Mar 30, 2008 17:58

On Mar 30, 7:45 pm, "rs...@nycap.rr.com" nycap.rr.com> wrote:
> If we are to discuss intelligence, we must first make our peace with
> the relationship between body and soul. Some, of course, are not aware
> that there is a problem. Let them be happy in their ignorance. Do not
> disturb.
>
> Others are aware of a pseudo-problem that they lay to a poor choice of
> words, a misuse of language. They tend to be very, very clever. They
> turn on a spigot, and a rush of words befogs the question.
>
> Soul (spirit, essence, psyche, mind, consciousness, awareness,
> intelligence, intellect, mentality, self, individuality, persona,
> personality, conscious mental field, self awareness, sentience,
> executive function).
>
> All these words imply an uneasiness with soul. All these words imply
> an object, or something approaching an object. Something we might
> carry about in a watch pocket and take out for display at an
> appropriate time.
> ...
Show full article (8.30Kb)
no comments
Re: intelligence         


Author: Sir Frederick
Date: Mar 30, 2008 19:05

On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:45:49 -0700 (PDT), "rscan@nycap.rr.com" nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>If we are to discuss intelligence, we must first make our peace with
>the relationship between body and soul. Some, of course, are not aware
>that there is a problem. Let them be happy in their ignorance...
Show full article (5.11Kb)
no comments
Re: intelligence         


Author: Immortalist
Date: Mar 30, 2008 21:23

On Mar 30, 7:05 pm, Sir Frederick fuzzysys.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:45:49 -0700 (PDT), "rs...@nycap.rr.com" nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>>If we are to discuss intelligence, we must first make our peace with
>>the relationship between body and soul. Some, of course, are not aware
>>that there is a problem. Let them be happy in their ignorance. Do not
>>disturb.
>
>>Others are aware of a pseudo-problem that they lay to a poor choice of
>>words, a misuse of language. They tend to be very, very clever. They
>>turn on a spigot, and a rush of words befogs the question.
>
>>Soul (spirit, essence, psyche, mind, consciousness, awareness,
>>intelligence, intellect, mentality, self, individuality, persona,
>>personality, conscious mental field, self awareness, sentience,
>>executive function).
>
>>All these words imply an uneasiness with soul. All these words imply
>>an object, or something approaching an object. Something we might
>>carry about in a watch pocket and take out for display at an
>>appropriate time. ...
Show full article (7.02Kb)
no comments
Re: intelligence         


Author: Immortalist
Date: Mar 30, 2008 21:52

>
> I'm actually heading towards explaining the illusion of consciousness,
> and I'm getting there...
>

I agree with much of what you say. But why is consciousness an
illusion? Is the quality of "wettness" of hydrogen and oxygen
molecules enmass, an illusion? No it is a quality of these atoms
interacting in changing relationships over time.

If you simulate water on a computer it still may not "feel" wet. I
think it is possible to create the qualities of experience by
manipulating matter but it may not be possible for circuits to
actually "feel" alive. Then again maybe it is possible, but I think
that if we want to simulate and emulate subjective experience we might
have to create some sort of wetware that produces fields and charges
like a brain does.
Show full article (4.91Kb)
no comments
Re: intelligence         


Author: Michael Gordge
Date: Mar 30, 2008 23:18

On Mar 31, 8:45 am, "rs...@nycap.rr.com" nycap.rr.com> wrote:
> If we are to discuss intelligence, we must first make our peace with
> the relationship between body and soul. Some, of course, are not aware
> that there is a problem.

My feet always go where my head tells them to go, so where's your
problem? Do your feet go south when your mind instructs them go north?

MG
no comments
Re: intelligence         


Author: Brian Fletcher
Date: Mar 31, 2008 04:45

"turtoni" fastmail.net> wrote in message
news:38d7cb82-9581-4ad0-97cb-21ccee79a680@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 30, 7:45 pm, "rs...@nycap.rr.com" nycap.rr.com> wrote:
> If we are to discuss intelligence, we must first make our peace with
> the relationship between body and soul. Some, of course, are not aware
> that there is a problem. Let them be happy in their ignorance. Do not
> disturb.
>
> Others are aware of a pseudo-problem that they lay to a poor choice of
> words, a misuse of language. They tend to be very, very clever. They
> turn on a spigot, and a rush of words befogs the question.
>
> Soul (spirit, essence, psyche, mind, consciousness, awareness,
> intelligence, intellect, mentality, self, individuality, persona,
> personality, conscious mental field, self awareness, sentience,
> executive function).
>
> All these words imply an uneasiness with soul. All these words imply
> an object, or something approaching an object. Something we might
> carry about in a watch pocket and take out for display at an ...
Show full article (8.52Kb)
no comments
Re: intelligence         


Author: Brian Fletcher
Date: Mar 31, 2008 05:00

"Immortalist" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4c10b35e-5092-4501-83de-4c91ce0ed042@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> I'm actually heading towards explaining the illusion of consciousness,
>> and I'm getting there...
>>
>
> I agree with much of what you say. But why is consciousness an
> illusion? Is the quality of "wettness" of hydrogen and oxygen
> molecules enmass, an illusion? No it is a quality of these atoms
> interacting in changing relationships over time.

It is only when one looks through 'non relative eyes' does the illusion
become apparent.Knowing a brick is made up of vibrating energy doesnt dampen
the pain when it drops on your foot.

At a more subtle and powerful level, the 'state of mind' people have, such
as victim consciousness (relationships are dominated by this state) can be
seen clearly as illusion. Made real by the observer.(s)

Below you make references to some amazing scientific speculations, with
tuble construction etc...but makes no progress into the 'reality of life'.
Show full article (5.77Kb)
no comments
Re: intelligence         


Author: zinnic
Date: Mar 31, 2008 07:36

On Mar 30, 11:25 pm, c...@kcwc.com (Curt Welch) wrote:
> "rs...@nycap.rr.com" nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>> If we are to discuss intelligence, we must first make our peace with
>> the relationship between body and soul. Some, of course, are not aware
>> that there is a problem. Let them be happy in their ignorance. Do not
>> disturb.
>
>> Others are aware of a pseudo-problem that they lay to a poor choice of
>> words, a misuse of language. They tend to be very, very clever. They
>> turn on a spigot, and a rush of words befogs the question.
>
>> Soul (spirit, essence, psyche, mind, consciousness, awareness,
>> intelligence, intellect, mentality, self, individuality, persona,
>> personality, conscious mental field, self awareness, sentience,
>> executive function).
>
>> All these words imply an uneasiness with soul. All these words imply
>> an object, or something approaching an object. Something we might
>> carry about in a watch pocket and take out for display at an
>> appropriate time. ...
Show full article (10.68Kb)
no comments
1 2