|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
|
Author: BhanwaraBhanwara Date: Jun 29, 2008 15:40
|
| |
|
| | 12 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Jun 29, 2008 21:11
> On Jun 29, 3:40 pm, Bhanwara netscape.net> wrote:
>>> How do you insult a book of rules?
>>
>
> I thought the Bush administration used the constitution to wipe their
> asses with.
And the Democrats came by, laughed at you, and passed the FISA - again.
Maybe they know something you obviously don't.
You're a crank, son: a crank.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: SaPeIsMaSaPeIsMa Date: Jun 30, 2008 06:10
The argument is just as stupid as the title
How can you "insult" a document ?
This is the same mindset that claims you can "insult" a book like the
Koran
Why don't you start by learning English as a start ?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: thatemailnamethatemailname Date: Jun 30, 2008 06:32
On Jun 29, 6:40 pm, Bhanwara netscape.net> wrote:
This article is beneath comment. Just suffice it to say that you have
no clue what you're talking about.
Hint: It wasn't the "NRA" - the big bad mean-spirited gun nut lobby -
that ruled on the 2nd am., it was the Supreme Court of the United
States. See the difference?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BenjBenj Date: Jun 30, 2008 06:43
On Jun 30, 9:10 am, "SaPeIsMa" Hotmail.com> wrote:
> The argument is just as stupid as the title
> How can you "insult" a document ?
> This is the same mindset that claims you can "insult" a book like the
> Koran
>
> Why don't you start by learning English as a start ?
It's the same way that "guns kill people". It's a primitive religion
known as "animism" which ascribes human properties to inanimate
objects.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: jane.playnejane.playne Date: Jun 30, 2008 07:26
On Jun 29, 6:40 pm, Bhanwara netscape.net> wrote:
You are looking at the word "militia" with today's view.
You really need to go read the writing of the time to understand what
the word militia meant at the time the Constitution was written.
The Militia Act of 1792 required every able-bodied free male to keep a
"musket or firelock".
"That the Militia of the United States shall consist of each and
every free, able bodied male citizen of the respective States,
resident therein, who are or shall be of the age of eighteen
years, and under the age of forty-five years" - Militia Act of 1792
"...the entire able-bodied population of a state; or a private force,
not under government control. - http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/militia
"...a million of citizens with arms in their hands" - James Madison
|
| Show full article (1.95Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Bert HymanBert Hyman Date: Jun 30, 2008 07:42
> On Jun 29, 6:40 pm, Bhanwara netscape.net> wrote:>
> You are looking at the word "militia" with today's view.
You're both looking at the word "militia" as if it had any bearing on
the discussion.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: tankfixertankfixer Date: Jun 30, 2008 18:58
In article comcast.com>, #
1Chekist@OGPU.org says...>> On Jun 29, 3:40 pm, Bhanwara netscape.net> wrote:
>>>>> How do you insult a book of rules?
>>>
>>
>> I thought the Bush administration used the constitution to wipe their
>> asses with.
>
> And the Democrats came by, laughed at you, and passed the FISA - again.
> Maybe they know something you obviously don't.
>
> You're a crank, son: a crank.
Didn't you mean he is ON crank ?
--
|
| Show full article (0.73Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Jun 30, 2008 23:31
On Jun 30, 6:58 pm, tankfixer gmail.comm> wrote:> In article comcast.com>, #
> 1Chek...@OGPU.org says...
>
>
>>>> On Jun 29, 3:40 pm, Bhanwara netscape.net> wrote:>
>>>> How do you insult a book of rules?
>
>>> I thought the Bush administration used the constitution to wipe their
>>> asses with.
>
>> And the Democrats came by, laughed at you, and passed the FISA - again.
>> Maybe they know something you obviously don't.
>
>> You're a crank, son: a crank.
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.10Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
