> The Korean "police action" circa 1950--1953 is a precursor to U.S.
> involvement in French Indo China aka Vietnam.
>
> The two were controversial-hated meat-grinding conflicts, which also
> precipitated domestic political change fom Democrats to Republicans as
> presidents.
>
> Truman--->Eisenhower
>
> Johnson-->Nixon
>
> Circa 1950--1953, the U.S. atomic bomb was not used, and circa 1960 to
> circa 1975, the U.S. nuclear bomb wasn't appplied either.
>
> These were deemed "limited wars" that were resisters of the spreading
> of Communism, and resulted in mixed success (Korea) & non-success
> (Nam).
>
> The U.S. foreign policy from after WW II to the early 1990s may be
> theme- titled as against Stalinism-Maoism-Castro etal styles of
> "authoritarian communism"
>
> And my profoundly simplistic point is:
>
> In warfare, shite happens such as the horrible deaths of innocent
> civilians whom are "in the way" or in a war front's proximity.
>
> In both the Iraq and Afghan war "quagmires," an extremely cold-blooded
> enemy thrives on the terroristic slaughtering of civilians: It's
> surely as loco (nutty) as their (apparent) dark ages social-economic
> agenda (apparently Tallibanism).
>
> Collateral (civilian) deaths are hereaby acknowledged 60 years later,
> however rationalized.
>
> Some 30,000 U.S. troops paid for by the United States are still over
> there.
>
> If and when a South Korean majority wants the U.S. to leave, the
> U.S.should exit.
>

> ...inside a ragged tent at the entrance of the
> park, some aging South Koreans gather daily to
> draw attention to their side of the conflict, a story
> of carnage not mentioned in South Korea’s
> official histories or textbooks.
>
> “When the napalm hit our village, many people were
> still sleeping in their homes,” said Lee Beom-ki, 76.
> “Those who survived the flames ran to the tidal flats.
> We were trying to show the American pilots that we
> were civilians. But they strafed us, women
> and children.”
>
> Village residents say dozens of civilians were killed.
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/world/asia/03korea.html?_r=1&hp&ore...
>

> .