On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:28:26 -0700 (PDT), Just Me gmail.com>
wrote:
>On Jul 13, 4:09Â pm, Malrassic Park hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:56:41 -0700 (PDT), Just Me gmail.com>
>
>>>And the tragedy is, so long as the true import of Kant's work in
>>>Categorical Logic, being decidedly an extension and refinement of
>>>the *Organon* of Aristotle; as it continues to be slandered and thus
>>>unrecognized for the precisely tuned logical instrument it is, the
>>>panacea of AI will continue to elude the efforts of software
>>>engineers, who given the impetus to access this which is in Kant's
>>>terms, "metaphysical science"--why! Wouldn't they be today far
>>>advanced along the way toward realizing this perfectly attainable
>>>dream?
>>
>> That's what I meant to say.
>
>Glad to hear it. Next time that happens, do please just go on ahead
>and say it to save my fingers from all this walking when they could
>have been out for a pleasant Sunday stroll through the Yellow Pages,
>looking for somebody who still knows how to fix funky G*d d@mn four
>barrel Rochester carburator?
I just don't have much time for beating dead horses, being fully
employed as I am, so tend to focus on writing new material instead...
>> " If I had remembered that the name 'Galt' appears
>> in one of her books, I would have chosen a different
>> name for my character."
>>
>> Stephen R. Donaldson, "Gradual Interview"
>
>Poor Ayn. She just can't get no respect.
As a philosopher she hasn't earned any respect.
--
" If I had remembered that the name 'Galt' appears
in one of her books, I would have chosen a different
name for my character."
Stephen R. Donaldson, "Gradual Interview"