>On Fri, 02 May 2008 18:15:13 +0930, Michael Gray
>newsguy.com> wrote:
>

>>On Thu, 1 May 2008 14:10:35 -0400, "Michelle Malkin"
>>comcast.net> wrote:
>>

>>>
>>>
>>>"DanielSan" gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:w--dnRVZTcSeNoTVnZ2dnUVZ_qrinZ2d@comcast.com...

>>>> Michelle Malkin wrote:

>>>>> "DanielSan" gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:gNednVZHP43sk4rVnZ2dnUVZ_ozinZ2d@comcast.com...

>>>>>> Zanthius wrote:

>>>>>>> On 29 Apr, 04:02, DanielSan gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>> Sorry, but if he's beyond our comprehension of the natural, then why
>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>> so many people believe they know the precise parameters thereof?

>>>>>>> The precise parameters of what? God of nature?

>>>>>> When I reference the word "God" with a capital G, I am, necessarily,
>>>>>> talking about the deity of the Christian religion.

>>>>>
>>>>> Why 'necessarily'? The Christian god is just one of many myths.

>>>>
>>>> Well, I should've said "Judeochristian religions". They're the only ones
>>>> that I know of that use the word "god" as proper name. Other religions,
>>>> both alive and dead, have different names for their myt^h^h^hdeities.
>>>> That's why I said "necessarily".
>>>>
>>>> As an aside, why do we call Earth's moon "the Moon"?

>>>
>>>Because most of our undereducated populace don't
>>>know that the moon's name is Luna.

>>
>>"Selene", surely?

>
>Selene is Greek, Luna is Latin.
>
>So the Lunar equivalent of geology would be selenology!