Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
>>> How do you know I haven't read Kuhn extensively. Why make up a lie
>>> about me to cover your lack of knowledge in the matter?
>>
>> Oh, pardon! I can't remember the thread but I could have sworn you
>> said that you never read the book and that the material in the
>> syllabus was sufficient. My bad.
>
> Your 'bad' is right.
So...are you claiming you *did* read the book?
>>> I provide the url so that you could introduce yourself to some
>>> relevant knowledge.
>>
>> How is it at all relevant? Regardless, is Kuhn an unquestioned
>> authority on anything? Hardly.
>
> Moron.
No response, eh. You cede the point.
>>>> Does anything Kuhn wrote have *anything* at all to do with this
>>>> thread? Nope. Just Hosehead throwing out red herrings and trying to
>>>> divert attention away from the fact that he doesn't know shit about
>>>> hypothesis testing.
>>>
>>> There you go again, making up lies you wish were true.
>>
>> Lies. Harumph. I haven't lied. Until you provide evidence to support
>> the alternative, we must reject in favor of the null hypothesis. Got
>> it?
>
> You're a pathological liar.
GFY dipshit. Show me where I have lied. I made a conjecture based on your
repeated evasion. Your latest response is more of the same. I have no choice
but to accept the null...your null mind.
>>> You brought up 'applied statistics and hypothesis testing'. The
>>> reading I suggested for you is absolutely relevant to both.
>>
>> If you don't understand why rejection of the "god" hypothesis is not
>> a positive assertion, then you have zero credibility in this
>> discussion.
>
> Riight!
Jesus, you are a dim fuckwad. Can't get together any reasoned response so
you type "Riiight". Is that what passes for witty repartee for you? Get
bent, Hosehead. LOL
No response, eh. You cede the point.
>>>>>>> I'm not the one obsessed with proving that something I believe
>>>>>>> doesn't exist, doesn't exist.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Neither am I. Nice try, Skippy!
>>>>>
>>>>> Riight!
>>>>
>>>> Go ahead and show one instance...just one...in all the years I have
>>>> been posting on Usenet...where i have tried to prove that God
>>>> doesn't exist. I won't hold my breath.>
>>>> Point, Geoff. Score: Geoff 37 - Hosehead
>>>> ziiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiip!
>>>
>>> Do you believe God exists or don't you. Try to answer the question
>>> without resorting to childish hysterics, as above.
>>
>> Hysterics...haha...there's a laugh. Notice I didn't accuse you of
>> lying even though I gave you the easiest of tasks to prove your
>> unsupported statement. All you had to do is provide one post where I
>> tried to prove the nonexistence of any god. Yet you couldn't do it.
And still couldn't. What does that say about your faithfullness to truth?
>> No. I do not believe that any gods exist. I wouldn't waste a single
>> moment trying to prove it either. It's not possible.
>
> Then why do you spend so much time asserting God's non existence. Looks
> like clinical obsession. Y'know, if it looks, swims, quacks
> and flies like a duck its a good bet its not a pink elephant.
Because all you pig-ignorant morons insist on shoving your fucking insipid
religion down our throats. If you assholes would keep your religion to
yourselves, I wouldn't give a flying fart about your silly myths.
>> Do you believe that Cupid exists?
>
> Relevance?
Do you bother trying to prove Cupid's nonexistence?
>>>>>>> No religious fanatic is more obsessed with God
>>>>>>> than the atheist.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even if that were true, it still wouldn't add one bit credence to
>>>>>> the "god" hypothesis. No amount of Nessie skeptics are going to
>>>>>> make a plesiosaur materialize in any Scottish loch, despite how
>>>>>> "obsessed" they are with this product of fevered imagination and
>>>>>> single-malts.
>>>>>
>>>>> And you say, your not obsessed with God?... LOL
>>>>
>>>> Wow...right over your head. *whooooooooooosh*
>>>
>>> Riight!
>>
>>
>> Right...it's manifest that you cannot fathom the point. If you can,
>> you would address my point instead of segueing with another
>> irrelevant comment.
>
> Riight!
More of that vaunted Lorr humor. What a fucking bore you are.
