|
|
 Up |
  |
Author: kevirwinkevirwin Date: Oct 7, 2006 01:01
Welcome, gentle reader, to my free complimentary analysis (PART I)
into:
the character (or lack thereof), the inconsistencies from one minute to
the next, the recurrent fantasies, the transparent hypocrisies, the
absolute lack of any human empathy in common with the species he
disgraces on a daily basis, the ineffably egregious logical blunders,
and total inability to comprehend another's viewpoint
of....................
Yes!! Yes!! Of course I could only be talking about one man
.................... {C'mon, do I **really** have to say his
name????) .
|
| Show full article (10.03Kb) |
| 64 Comments |
|
|
|
Author: TracyTracy Date: Oct 7, 2006 05:22
|
| |
| 60 Comments |
|
|
Author: Bret CahillBret Cahill Date: Oct 7, 2006 09:47
> Why?
A lot of normal people laugh at me for "debating" libtards / Rantards
because they believe that libtards/Rantards are so out of it.
(I put "debate" in quotes because generally there is no debate, just a
rightard dodging issues.)
While libtards/Rantards are very dumb, that isn't the end of the story.
Right now the economy is suffering from GOP tax cuts running up
interest rates. Why aren't we having a high tax Clinton economic boom?
It's because the "libertarian" lies, disinformation and propaganda
still hold some sway.
Bret Cahill
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: kevirwinkevirwin Date: Oct 7, 2006 14:19
Tracy wrote:
> kevirwin wrote:
>
>
>
> Why?
Sorry, Tracy... It's **really** only meant for his eyes.
As to why; my belief is that he does a great disservice to this forum
by his continuous abusive ranting. I do think he has caused
"reasonable" individuals to leave the forum because of it. I've
pointed this fact out to him on numerous occasions (when he asks,
"why do I care how he acts?"). You'd think everyone's primary
purpose (other than to persuade) would be to exchange
thoughts/views/beliefs on the topics that comprise the arena of
philosophy. I came here to learn how people think; it's less
effective in a hostile environment.
|
| Show full article (1.35Kb) |
| 58 Comments |
|
|
Author: Bill SnyderBill Snyder Date: Oct 7, 2006 14:54
> Tracy wrote:
>> kevirwin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Why?>
> Sorry, Tracy... It's **really** only meant for his eyes.
>
> As to why; my belief is that he does a great disservice to this forum
> by his continuous abusive ranting. I do think he has caused
> "reasonable" individuals to leave the forum because of it. I've
> pointed this fact out to him on numerous occasions (when he asks,
> "why do I care how he acts?"). You'd think everyone's primary
> purpose (other than to persuade) would be to exchange
> thoughts/views/beliefs on the topics that comprise the arena of
> philosophy. I came here to learn how people think; it's less
> effective in a hostile environment. ...
|
| Show full article (1.94Kb) |
| 30 Comments |
|
|
Author: zinniczinnic Date: Oct 7, 2006 15:18
kevirwin wrote:
> Welcome, gentle reader, to my free complimentary analysis (PART I)
> into:
> the character (or lack thereof), the inconsistencies from one minute to
> the next, the recurrent fantasies, the transparent hypocrisies, the
> absolute lack of any human empathy in common with the species he
> disgraces on a daily basis, the ineffably egregious logical blunders,
> and total inability to comprehend another's viewpoint
> of....................
>
> Yes!! Yes!! Of course I could only be talking about one man
> .................... {C'mon, do I **really** have to say his
> name????) .
>
> Now to do this right, of course, I needed several representative
> samplings of his wretched scrawling, but that was no trouble at all.
> His garbage permeates ALT.P like maggots in rotted meat (what figure of
> speech is that called, Mikey; is it a metaphor or a simile?? I
> forget.....Was I being facetious, sarcastic, or sardonic??) . And while
> Mikey's obstreperous overtures appear to be sweet music cascading ...
|
| Show full article (10.74Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: mikegordgemikegordge Date: Oct 7, 2006 15:25
Bill Snyder wrote:
> The way to deal with two-bit snots is just to ignore them. Why should it
> matter to any sane person what such cretins say to you or about you. It may
> be worth a thesis topic to explore why people give a shit about such
> cretins. Speaking as a retired academic, I have read many topics of less
> importance. Any intelligent person who is scared away from this forum by
> such verbal gymnastics is a contradiction in terms.
>
> BS
I do laugh at BS as a signature, one cant help but think you're just
taking the piss.
Although I absolutely agree with you Bill very well said, *sticks and
stones can break your bones but words can never hurt you (unless you
let them)* socialists have had it their way for far too long, enough is
enough eh Bill?
Its NOT the person, its not HOW they say it, but its their IDEAS that
count, its a person's IDEAS that ought be the focus of attack and
socialist Kantian Platonian Russellian Rawlian Poppereen Mystical ideas
are the absolute scouge of mankind.
|
| Show full article (3.07Kb) |
| 26 Comments |
|
|
Author: TracyTracy Date: Oct 7, 2006 15:26
Bill Snyder wrote:
>> Tracy wrote:
>>> kevirwin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Why?>>
>> Sorry, Tracy... It's **really** only meant for his eyes.
>>
>> As to why; my belief is that he does a great disservice to this forum
>> by his continuous abusive ranting. I do think he has caused
>> "reasonable" individuals to leave the forum because of it. I've
>> pointed this fact out to him on numerous occasions (when he asks,
>> "why do I care how he acts?"). You'd think everyone's primary
>> purpose (other than to persuade) would be to exchange
>> thoughts/views/beliefs on the topics that comprise the arena of
>> philosophy. I came here to learn how people think; it's less ...
|
| Show full article (3.61Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: zinniczinnic Date: Oct 7, 2006 15:32
kevirwin wrote:
> Welcome, gentle reader, to my free complimentary analysis (PART I)
> into: SNIP (etc)
I repeat, cos I hold a 'Grudge' against being relegated to "Read
more".
Come off it Kev, you #%%#@^ing, $#*%%^^#@!*ing, %%^*#@**^%%$ person. Try
to explain the meaning of every word in your post without using any
words used in your post!!
Sorry but, reading this post about 'Gordgeous' made me feel so Randy,
I just could not resist this ejaculation.
Zinnic
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: kevirwinkevirwin Date: Oct 7, 2006 16:01
> Bill Snyder wrote:
>
>> The way to deal with two-bit snots is just to ignore them. Why should it
>> matter to any sane person what such cretins say to you or about you. It may
>> be worth a thesis topic to explore why people give a shit about such
>> cretins. Speaking as a retired academic, I have read many topics of less
>> importance. Any intelligent person who is scared away from this forum by
>> such verbal gymnastics is a contradiction in terms.
>>
>> BS
>
> I do laugh at BS as a signature, one cant help but think you're just
> taking the piss.
>
> Although I absolutely agree with you Bill very well said, *sticks and
> stones can break your bones but words can never hurt you (unless you
> let them)* socialists have had it their way for far too long, enough is
> enough eh Bill?
> ...
|
| Show full article (4.20Kb) |
| 25 Comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
