I am you, you are I
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.philosophy only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.philosophy Profile…
 Up
I am you, you are I         


Author: Theresa McCarty
Date: Aug 12, 2008 15:19

Socialization and genetics aside as crucial variables, individual
subjectivity is not otherwise differentiable and is thus identical in all.
31 Comments
Re: I am you, you are I         


Author: Sir Frederick
Date: Aug 12, 2008 15:30

On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:19:22 -0400, "Theresa McCarty" qx.net>
wrote:
> Socialization and genetics aside as crucial variables, individual
>subjectivity is not otherwise differentiable and is thus identical in all.
>
For example, some people are not able to experience the
representational illusion of color, due to differences in brain
structure. Is that what you mean?
no comments
Re: I am you, you are I         


Author: Mark Earnest
Date: Aug 12, 2008 16:02

"Theresa McCarty" qx.net> wrote in message
news:HbidnSPr3rs8kT_VnZ2dnUVZ_qPinZ2d@insightbb.com...
> Socialization and genetics aside as crucial variables, individual
> subjectivity is not otherwise differentiable and is thus identical in all.

But betwixt the republics of the sincere imagations, we are all identical,
and all different.
no comments
Re: I am you, you are I         


Author: turtoni
Date: Aug 12, 2008 16:40

On Aug 12, 6:19 pm, "Theresa McCarty" qx.net> wrote:
>     Socialization and genetics aside as crucial variables, individual
> subjectivity is not otherwise differentiable and is thus identical in all.

"Man isn't a noble savage, he's an ignoble savage. He is irrational,
brutal, weak, silly, unable to be objective about anything where his
own interests are involved - that about sums it up. I'm interested in
the brutal and violent nature of man because it's a true picture of
him. And any attempt to create social institutions on a false view of
the nature of man is probably doomed to failure." - Stanley Kubrick
no comments
Re: I am you, you are I         


Author: Ed
Date: Aug 12, 2008 16:45

On Aug 12, 6:19 pm, "Theresa McCarty" qx.net> wrote:
>     Socialization and genetics aside as crucial variables, individual
> subjectivity is not otherwise differentiable and is thus identical in all.

Does this mean that identical twins, raised together, have
indistinguishable "subjectivities"?
no comments
Re: I am you, you are I         


Author: bigfletch8
Date: Aug 12, 2008 16:54

On Aug 13, 8:19 am, "Theresa McCarty" qx.net> wrote:
>     Socialization and genetics aside as crucial variables, individual
> subjectivity is not otherwise differentiable and is thus identical in all.

Reality is and always has been, the observer, not the observed. We
each, by definition, have a unique viewpoint. Our acummulated
observations demonstrate this fact.Our constant squabbling demonstrate
the lack of this understanding. The level of all conflict is inversly
proportional to the level of self awareness.

BOfL
no comments
Re: I am you, you are I         


Author: bigfletch8
Date: Aug 12, 2008 16:57

On Aug 13, 9:40 am, turtoni fastmail.net> wrote:
> On Aug 12, 6:19 pm, "Theresa McCarty" qx.net> wrote:
>
>>     Socialization and genetics aside as crucial variables, individual
>> subjectivity is not otherwise differentiable and is thus identical in all.
>
> "Man isn't a noble savage, he's an ignoble savage. He is irrational,
> brutal, weak, silly, unable to be objective about anything where his
> own interests are involved - that about sums it up. I'm interested in
> the brutal and violent nature of man because it's a true picture of
> him. And any attempt to create social institutions on a false view of
> the nature of man is probably doomed to failure." - Stanley Kubrick

He sure had a vested interest in that perspective. Even had a go at
poor old Beethoven :-).

"One small step in understanding mankind, one giant step to
individual awareness"

BOfL
no comments
Re: I am you, you are I         


Author: bigfletch8
Date: Aug 12, 2008 16:58

On Aug 13, 9:45 am, Ed earthlink.net> wrote:
> On Aug 12, 6:19 pm, "Theresa McCarty" qx.net> wrote:
>
>>     Socialization and genetics aside as crucial variables, individual
>> subjectivity is not otherwise differentiable and is thus identical in all.
>
> Does this mean that identical twins, raised together, have
> indistinguishable "subjectivities"?

If they do, their wife is in for a 'hell' of a time...unless of
course, they both looked like Sean Connery :-).

BOfL
no comments
Re: I am you, you are I         


Author: Immortalist
Date: Aug 12, 2008 23:05

On Aug 12, 3:19 pm, "Theresa McCarty" qx.net> wrote:
> Socialization and genetics aside as crucial variables, individual
> subjectivity is not otherwise differentiable and is thus identical in all.

It might go deeper than that. The experience we recognize as
experience, or feeling like we exist, may be happening in the brain-
stem, and hence most animal have this self, but don't have a bunch of
stuff wired up to it like limbic systems and outer cortices.

Your "3-Brains-in-One" Brain

You may have thought all you had was one, but inside there are two
more brains.

Actually, you already know this from your experience: for example,
remember a time when you really wanted to do something, but you knew
you shouldn't? The most illogical or irrational "wants" we have
probably derive from older parts of our brain, while the understanding
of smart versus dumb choices comes from the newest part. If that idea
offends you, or seems just too "Western" or "scientific", you might
take a "de-tour" for a moment and read this essay on science.
Show full article (5.87Kb)
no comments
Re: I am you, you are I         


Author: turtoni
Date: Aug 12, 2008 23:38

On Aug 13, 2:05 am, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Aug 12, 3:19 pm, "Theresa McCarty" qx.net> wrote:
>
>>     Socialization and genetics aside as crucial variables, individual
>> subjectivity is not otherwise differentiable and is thus identical in all.
>
> It might go deeper than that. The experience we recognize as
> experience, or feeling like we exist, may be happening in the brain-
> stem, and hence most animal have this self, but don't have a bunch of
> stuff wired up to it like limbic systems and outer cortices.
>
> Your "3-Brains-in-One" Brain
>
> You may have thought all you had was one, but inside there are two
> more brains.
>
> Actually, you already know this from your experience: for example,
> remember a time when you really wanted to do something, but you knew
> you shouldn't? The most illogical or irrational "wants" we have
> probably derive from older parts of our brain, while the understanding ...
Show full article (6.37Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4