On Jan 7, 10:01 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:

Your fictional stories would be more interesting if they contained
some diversity. As is it is more like reading one hundred different
version of "The golden seal" where only the color of the seal
changes. Surely if you are going to continue to create fictional evil
characters you can add a bit of variation to each one?!

Not that GOP free marketry economists weren't already completely
discredited by the high tax Clinton economic boom but no one will deny
that having Huck talk about the increasing disparity of wealth damages
GOP _even if they buy him off after the election which of course they
will_.

You believe fundies will vote for a cross dressing gay marriage
supporting abortionist like Ghouliani?

Sorry, DC politics ain't very sophisticated.

Bret Cahill

On Jan 8, 4:12 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:

On Jan 8, 1:06 pm, Michae...@gmail.com wrote:

What happened to Hillary's "15pt landslide"?

I'd settle for even a modicum of consistency.

Of course in the alternate universe of delusions where Brat resides
that's probably asking too much.

Fred Weiss

The general election is in November. You have to remember that unlike
Repugs who will buy off Huckabee in a smoke filled soom, we Democrats
go through a competitive primary process where corp. boss controlled
media whores gush, "its a HORSE RACE" over and over.

Bret Cahill

On Jan 9, 8:57 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:

Oh, ok, now that you cleared that up.

On the other hand, I'm sure that just the other day you were telling
us that the "corp whore media" had already decided to make Osama the
nominee. Fickle chaps aren't they, since now they are calling Hillar-
ious "The Comeback Kid".

On the other other hand, they are making much of Hillar-ious' weeping
episode. "Is that what pulled out the win for her?", they're asking.
It wasn't exactly at the magnitude of "the vast right wing conspiracy"
but it was certainly touching - if not exactly presidential. They may
not be able to elevate to Dean's famous "Scream", but hey, they're
just warming up.

We're all waiting patiently for something on the order of Kerry's "I
was for it before I was against it."

Fred Weiss

I dunno. Shouldn't the corp. media be gushing "it's a horse race"
right now?

They were gushing "it's a horse race" BEFORE the Iowa caucus.

I wonder what happened.

You got any clues?

Well we know NH voters _told_ the corp. boss controlled whore media
they were gonna vote Obama 12 points over Clinton.

Funny how that didn't happen.

You got any clues on how the corp. boss whore media could be wrong by
14 points?

Maybe they missed a decimal place or sumthin'

. . . .

Yea, judging by the 14 point error of the corp. media in NH, it's
probably more like 17 points.

But, hey, no one's perfect.

Bret Cahill

On Jan 9, 10:22 pm, Bret Cahill aol.com> wrote:

Me? I'm clueless. Really. And mostly indifferent. I get all my info on
this election from you.

Or mebbe they're not as all-knowing and powerful as you think they are
- not to mention that you've got their political slant completely
backasswards. Brat, they're on *your* side. Well, mostly and
admittedly somewhat less so since the advent of Fox and the whole
country's shift to the right over the last couple of decades. But
still, mostly on your side.

You mean like they were finished after Goldwater? And then after
Nixon?