|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Michael GordgeMichael Gordge Date: Dec 31, 2007 13:59
You Do The Hokey Tokey
You step your left foot IN
You step your left foot OUT
You step your right foot IN
You step your right foot OUT
You do the Hokey Tokey
And you turn around
And thats' what its all about.
Knowledge has context which Kantians are required to reject.
Its your turn now Mal, in reality "10 minutes ago" has its very own
meaning, in reality it only means one thing and in reality you keep
avoiding it.
Why dont you want to explain the real meaning of "10 minutes ago"
Mal?
You're Kantian, you were born with knowledge of time, your knowledge
of time, according to Kant, is NOT dependent in any way upon objects
awakening your experiences, sooo lets seee how good your maker (Kant)
of your knowledge of time in reality is, explain the meaning of "10
minutes ago" without any objects awakening your experiences.
|
| Show full article (0.87Kb) |
|
| | 10 Comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Dec 31, 2007 19:31
On Dec 31, 1:59 pm, Michael Gordge xtra.co.nz> wrote:> You Do The Hokey Tokey
>
> You step your left foot IN
> You step your left foot OUT
> You step your right foot IN
> You step your right foot OUT
> You do the Hokey Tokey
> And you turn around
>
> And thats' what its all about.
>
All known objects are processes. Consciousness is as much an object as
other processes that re-present a present moment through changing
stuff, everything is constantly changing and opposite things are...
|
| Show full article (1.58Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Michael GordgeMichael Gordge Date: Jan 1, 2008 00:17
On Jan 1, 12:31 pm, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
Dropping context, the last subject between us was the god piffle and
you never told me what you were agnostic about.
MG
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Jan 2, 2008 00:36
On Jan 1, 12:17 am, Michael Gordge xtra.co.nz> wrote:> On Jan 1, 12:31 pm, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Dropping context, the last subject between us was the god piffle and
> you never told me what you were agnostic about.
>
> MG
I was agnostic about the outcome of the sunday game but still bet on
the winner, the odds were in their favor. Similarly you wont get far
with saying that any degree of doubt is fallacious. You still have not
given good enough answers to the "regress" and the "given" problems.
But your bullying method works very well at keeping the 300
subscribers to alt.philosophy away. Is that what you want?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Michael GordgeMichael Gordge Date: Jan 2, 2008 02:16
On Jan 2, 5:36 pm, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
> But your bullying method works very well at keeping the 300
> subscribers to alt.philosophy away.
Well away you go name them.
> Is that what you want?
alt.philosphy IS one of, if not the most active newsgroup around, I've
been here for 6 or more years and I've seem em come and seen em go,
the tough hang around and some learn and some dont want to, I have
learnt and want to learn more.
I have helped some and answered most genuine "unloaded" questions to
the best of my ability.
I do not get personal, how can I when 99%% of you are too fucking
scared and or dishonest to say who you are? I rarely attack those who
are genuine, knucmo was one and yet he said plenty that would have
justified a good verbal bashing, I refrained because his questions on
the whole were genuine. I believe I treat you reasonable too.
|
| Show full article (1.56Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: brian fletcherbrian fletcher Date: Jan 2, 2008 06:43
"Michael Gordge" xtra.co.nz> wrote in message
news:3b23c288-c007-4dc8-9916-94da897a15a0@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 2, 5:36 pm, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
> But your bullying method works very well at keeping the 300
> subscribers to alt.philosophy away.
Well away you go name them.
> Is that what you want?
alt.philosphy IS one of, if not the most active newsgroup around, I've
been here for 6 or more years and I've seem em come and seen em go,
the tough hang around and some learn and some dont want to, I have
learnt and want to learn more.
I have helped some and answered most genuine "unloaded" questions to
the best of my ability.
I do not get personal, how can I when 99%% of you are too fucking
scared and or dishonest to say who you are? I rarely attack those who
are genuine, knucmo was one and yet he said plenty that would have
justified a good verbal bashing, I refrained because his questions on
the whole were genuine. I believe I treat you reasonable too.
|
| Show full article (2.08Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: zinniczinnic Date: Jan 2, 2008 07:45
On Jan 2, 4:16 am, Michael Gordge xtra.co.nz> wrote:> On Jan 2, 5:36 pm, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> But your bullying method works very well at keeping the 300
>> subscribers to alt.philosophy away.
>
> Well away you go name them.
>
>> Is that what you want?
>
> alt.philosphy IS one of, if not the most active newsgroup around, I've
> been here for 6 or more years and I've seem em come and seen em go,
> the tough hang around and some learn and some dont want to, I have
> learnt and want to learn more.
>
> I have helped some and answered most genuine "unloaded" questions to
> the best of my ability.
>
> I do not get personal, how can I when 99%% of you are too fucking
> scared and or dishonest to say who you are? I rarely attack those who ...
|
| Show full article (3.51Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Michael GordgeMichael Gordge Date: Jan 2, 2008 11:12
On Jan 2, 11:43 pm, "brian fletcher" bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> Tell me one thing you have learned in the years
> you have been here?
I'll tell you many things Brian.
I didn't realise the hate of reason was as bad and as irrational as it
is, I've learnt that those who obviously regard themselves as gurus on
matters of philosophy hate the most their ideas being challenged...
|
| Show full article (2.22Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Jan 2, 2008 19:55
On Jan 2, 2:16 am, Michael Gordge xtra.co.nz> wrote:> On Jan 2, 5:36 pm, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> But your bullying method works very well at keeping the 300
>> subscribers to alt.philosophy away.
>
> Well away you go name them.
>
alt.philosophy
High activity, 1618 subscribers,
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.philosophy/topics
If I name them, then you'll want their gender, right? What difference
does it make, a bunch of us once had a final court kinds thing going
here where people brought their bullies in, and we tried to present
just the arguments.
|
| Show full article (2.35Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: malenoidmalenoid Date: Jan 7, 2008 10:49
On Jan 2, 12:12 pm, Michael Gordge xtra.co.nz> wrote:> On Jan 2, 11:43 pm, "brian fletcher" bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>>> Tell me one thing you have learned in the years
>> you have been here?
>
> I'll tell you many things Brian.
>
> I didn't realise the hate of reason was as bad and as irrational as it
> is, I've learnt that those who obviously regard themselves as gurus on
> matters of philosophy hate the most their ideas being challenged or
> asked to explain in more detail, e.g. chazzz says that "your (mine)
> problem is that your ideas are too black and white" and so I asked him
> the obvious, "what colour then did he want his idea to be that my
> ideas are too black and white"? He hasn't answered in reality because
> he wanted to make a very black and very white statement of my ideas,
> and I've learnt a lot about other so called philosophers and what made
> them tick, Zeno, Popper, Rawls to name but three, and I do that by
> going to web sites when I see a name of someone I dont recognize, I
> have also learnt many things scientific e.g. from people like, oh hell ...
|
| Show full article (2.75Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
