|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: kmurphy004kmurphy004 Date: Jul 31, 2007 14:41
It is clear to me that some blacks/African-Americans are sincere in wanting
the use of the N-word to stop. As a benevolent and merciful cracker (or is
it cracka) I am moved by their pleas and so I will inform all of you as to
the requirements for this. If blacks/African-Americans were to insist on
the use of the word 'negro' instead or either of the monikers 'black' or
'African-American' then that would stop blacks/African-Americans from using
the N-word amongst themselves... maybe two or three generations from now.
The reason why whites/crackers/crackas use the N-word is because it can't be
a hate crime if blacks/African-Americans/negroes are using the N-word
amongst themselves. So putting an end to hate crime law would make it much
easier to end the use of the N-word. The obvious question...
|
| Show full article (1.24Kb) |
|
| | 44 Comments |
|
|
Author: kenny gkenny g Date: Jul 31, 2007 19:51
> It is clear to me that some blacks/African-Americans are sincere in wanting
> the use of the N-word to stop. As a benevolent and merciful cracker (or is
> it cracka) I am moved by their pleas and so I will inform all of you as to
> the requirements for this. If blacks/African-Americans were to insist on
> the use of the word 'negro' instead or either of the monikers 'black' or
> 'African-American' then that would stop blacks/African-Americans from using
> the N-word amongst themselves... maybe two or three generations from now.
> The reason why whites/crackers/crackas use the N-word is because it can't be
> a hate crime if blacks/African-Americans/negroes are using the N-word
> amongst themselves. So putting an end to hate crime law would make it much
> easier to end the use of the N-word. The obvious question is, will the use
> of the N-word ever stop? Probably not, because for reasons known only to
> blacks/African-Americans/negroes, the word 'negro' constitutes as attack on
> their 'manhood'... whatever.
>
> --
> Overheard:"If I am a friend of the family then I at least must be from
> Texas. You shouldn't worry your pretty little head about politics, baby, if
> it is something that you're curious about, just ask an adult and we'll keep ...
|
| Show full article (1.95Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Day BrownDay Brown Date: Jul 31, 2007 20:44
One of the advantages of being a honkey is that there is nothing you
can call me that will elicit an emotional response. Some niggers have
figured that out.
PBS, the network for oreos and nigger lovers, has yet to get it.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: chazwinchazwin Date: Aug 1, 2007 07:27
On Aug 1, 4:44 am, Day Brown hughes.net> wrote:> One of the advantages of being a honkey is that there is nothing you
> can call me that will elicit an emotional response. Some niggers have
> figured that out.
>
> PBS, the network for oreos and nigger lovers, has yet to get it.
The debate concerning words as applied to racism is a complete red-
herring.
It is not the words that are used but the way in which those words are
employed.
Quentin Tarrentino can say "nigger" because...
|
| Show full article (2.64Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Aug 1, 2007 11:14
> It is clear to me that some blacks/African-Americans are sincere in wanting
> the use of the N-word to stop. As a benevolent and merciful cracker (or is
> it cracka) I am moved by their pleas and so I will inform all of you as to
> the requirements for this. If blacks/African-Americans were to insist on
> the use of the word 'negro' instead or either of the monikers 'black' or
> 'African-American' then that would stop blacks/African-Americans from using
> the N-word amongst themselves... maybe two or three generations from now.
> The reason why whites/crackers/crackas use the N-word is because it can't be
> a hate crime if blacks/African-Americans/negroes are using the N-word
> amongst themselves. So putting an end to hate crime law...
|
| Show full article (9.31Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Day BrownDay Brown Date: Aug 1, 2007 17:21
If the niggers had no emotional reaction to the term nigger, like I
have no reaction to the use of the word honkey, then they would
empower themselves, and not have to ask the honkey not to use a word
which upsets them. Which means, that they leave it in my power to
upset them by simply calling them niggers.
But of course, that is a trait of niggers.
Now, as for the Jews, it'd really be interesting to get samples and
trace the Y chromosomes- which in most cases I expect will not trace
back to the area around Jerusalem, but in fact from various Aryan
lines. For, ever since Trajan, "Jewish" women have been raped by the
Aryan leaders of the local power structure. That may have something to
do with the synagogues recognizing anyone with a Jewish mother as a
"Jew".
Its consistent with the pattern, that ever since Alexander, Aryans
have come into the Levant with relatively small forces and maintained
themselves, "Israel" being the latest example. But this does not
negate the right of the mtDNA to reclaim the land of their ancestors
the same as Native American women mite make the claim.
|
| Show full article (1.34Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: kmurphy004kmurphy004 Date: Aug 1, 2007 18:35
On 1-Aug-2007, Day Brown hughes.net> wrote:
> If the niggers had no emotional reaction to the term nigger, like I
> have no reaction to the use of the word honkey, then they would
> empower themselves, and not have to ask the honkey not to use a word
> which upsets them. Which means, that they leave it in my power to
> upset them by simply calling them niggers.
>
> But of course, that is a trait of niggers.
I've probably put too much thought into this but here goes... As a general
rule, I avoid using expletives in my speech although I consider them to be a
valid means to add emphasis to my prose. As a tool or weapon, expletives
leave something to be desired because of their overuse and because of
inappropriate use. Negro is a more effective tool or weapon then the
n-word, IMHO. Both negro and the n-word will provoke an emotional response
but negro especially is more potent by virtue of the fact that there is
nothing inappropriate about it by way of reason. Negro is a term which
simply means a black person.
|
| Show full article (1.28Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: kevirwinkevirwin Date: Aug 1, 2007 19:37
uh, anyone want to play, "Spot the Rascist"?
It's fun and it's easy... One person in this thread has crossed the
line...See if you can guess who it is????
hours (ok, seconds) of amusement,
K e v
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: kenny gkenny g Date: Aug 1, 2007 23:00
> In the USA the constitution guarantees free speech and there a laws
> which punish speech that becomes slanderous or can cause a riot. We
> just make agreements and compromises to determine which is which. It
> evolves.
>
> It is sometimes suggested that we distinguish offending from harming.
>
> But surely it is implausible to think that the giving of offense is
> never harmful to the offended party. People may be deeply offended at
> witnessing what they regard as immoral or obscene acts and behavior. A
> deeply religious person may be significantly pained by seeing or
> hearing about what he regards as a sacrilegious speech or play.
> Virtually anyone in contemporary Western societies would be disgusted
> by public defecation. In at least some such cases, the offense given
> can be not only upsetting but can induce rage, affect health, and
> perhaps even alter the course of a person's life, e.g., as when
> someone makes it her or his life work to stamp out pornography.
>
> Can the claim to liberty be reconciled with the claim to be safe from
> constant offense? A first step at reconciliation would involve ...
|
| Show full article (8.85Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
