> On Aug 26, 7:32 am, "Spaceman"
> wrote:
>> Timberwoof wrote:
>
>>> Look, you don't impress me by calling me an idiot or a moron. I've
>>> read Penrose as well as books on 3D modeling. Your simple systems
>>> don't account for real-world effects that astronomers and physicists
>>> measure. They're good for making pretty pictures, but they fail at
>>> relativistic effects.
>>
>> Actually it does, The simple system accounts for everything.
>> If you knew how it works, you would agree, but sadly you have been
>> brainwashed by the transform crap that actually DOES NOT WORK
>> and will cause crashing before crashing would actually occur
>> according to your silly transform bullshit.-
>
> Okay, so please explain the constancy of the relative
> velocity of light in all directions from all frames of
> reference, no matter what the relative velocities of
> those frames of reference are to one another.
I don't need to explain such since such is actually false.
The relative velocity of light is not constant to all frames.
The only time the velocity is constant is in source and
observer"at rest" conditions.
> This
> phenomena has been observed, and was the driving
> observation behind SRT. So, this space is left for
> you to find an alternative explanation that is just
> as elegant and useful:-------->
I have explained such many times here in this group.
SRT has been using tricks such as using the relative wavelength
being measured instead of the physical wavelength for
the old trick of "wavelength*frequency = speed" method.
If the "physical wavelength" is used you find the relative
speed instead.
Just as you need to measure and use the physical distances traveled
to find a relative to the gound speed.
A simple proof could be performed by using 1 second of light
from a source.
All "at rest" with the source objects will in fact see 1 second of light,
but of course any object traveling towards the source would see
less than one second of light and any moving away from the source
would in fact see more than 1 second of light.
This simple proof confirms the speed of light is relative, and not
constant to all frames.
--
James M Driscoll Jr
Creator of the Clock Malfunction Theory
Spaceman
