|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: C3C3 Date: Aug 4, 2008 19:58
Christopher Reeve supported stem cell research which is the brutal
scientific murder and manipulation of innocent lives and he tried to
claim he saved lives in the process of destroying them. Michael J.
Fox followed suit. Pope John Paul II had the same life threatening
disease (Parkinson's) and did not sell out because of it.
C3
|
| |
|
| | 15 Comments |
|
|
Author: T-minus108T-minus108 Date: Aug 4, 2008 20:08
On Aug 4, 10:58Â pm, C3 aol.com> wrote:> Christopher Reeve supported stem cell research which is the brutal
> scientific murder and manipulation of innocent lives and he tried to
> claim he saved lives in the process of destroying them. Â Michael J.
> Fox followed suit. Â Pope John Paul II had the same life threatening
> disease (Parkinson's) and did not sell out because of it.
>
> C3
Why didn't God save him? hmm?
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: ShrikebackShrikeback Date: Aug 4, 2008 20:32
On Aug 4, 8:08Â pm, T-minus108 gmail.com> wrote:> On Aug 4, 10:58Â pm, C3 aol.com> wrote:
>>> Christopher Reeve supported stem cell research which is the brutal
>> scientific murder and manipulation of innocent lives and he tried to
>> claim he saved lives in the process of destroying them. Â Michael J.
>> Fox followed suit. Â Pope John Paul II had the same life threatening
>> disease (Parkinson's) and did not sell out because of it.
>
>> C3
>
> Why didn't God save him? hmm?
Because suffering is just God's way of telling you
life ain't a party all the time.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: T-minus108T-minus108 Date: Aug 4, 2008 20:38
On Aug 4, 11:32Â pm, Shrikeb...@ gmail.com wrote: > On Aug 4, 8:08Â pm, T-minus108 gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Aug 4, 10:58Â pm, C3 aol.com> wrote:>
>>> Christopher Reeve supported stem cell research which is the brutal
>>> scientific murder and manipulation of innocent lives and he tried to
>>> claim he saved lives in the process of destroying them. Â Michael J.
>>> Fox followed suit. Â Pope John Paul II had the same life threatening
>>> disease (Parkinson's) and did not sell out because of it.
>
>>> C3
>
>> Why didn't God save him? hmm?
>
> Because suffering is just God's way of telling you
> life ain't a party all the time.
So he chose to suffer and die? The truth is God couldn't save him...
but he could've saved himself.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Aug 4, 2008 21:12
On Aug 5, 12:58Â pm, C3 aol.com> wrote:> Christopher Reeve supported stem cell research which is the brutal
> scientific murder and manipulation of innocent lives and he tried to
> claim he saved lives in the process of destroying them. Â Michael J.
> Fox followed suit. Â Pope John Paul II had the same life threatening
> disease (Parkinson's) and did not sell out because of it.
>
> C3
A few predessesors ago, the Pope took sides with the Nazis, and in
fact they would nt have come into power if the church had have come
out against them.
I would have thought the pope of all people would have welcomed 'the
pearly gates'.
|
| Show full article (1.24Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Aug 4, 2008 21:13
On Aug 5, 1:32Â pm, Shrikeb...@ gmail.com wrote: > On Aug 4, 8:08Â pm, T-minus108 gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Aug 4, 10:58Â pm, C3 aol.com> wrote:>
>>> Christopher Reeve supported stem cell research which is the brutal
>>> scientific murder and manipulation of innocent lives and he tried to
>>> claim he saved lives in the process of destroying them. Â Michael J.
>>> Fox followed suit. Â Pope John Paul II had the same life threatening
>>> disease (Parkinson's) and did not sell out because of it.
>
>>> C3
>
>> Why didn't God save him? hmm?
>
> Because suffering is just God's way of telling you
> life ain't a party all the time.
Ever had a two way conversation on that or any other issue, or are you
demonstrating the second hand experience syndrome?
|
| Show full article (0.79Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Aug 4, 2008 21:32
On Aug 4, 7:58 pm, C3 aol.com> wrote:> Christopher Reeve supported stem cell research which is the brutal
> scientific murder and manipulation of innocent lives and he tried to
> claim he saved lives in the process of destroying them.
Now, is a fetus a human being? This seems to be the central question.
Well, if a fetus is a human being, how come the census doesn't count
them? If a fetus is a human being, how come when there's a miscarriage
they don't have a funeral? If a fetus is a human being, how come
people say "we have two children and one on the way" instead of saying
"we have three children?" People say life begins at conception, I say
life began about a billion years ago and it's a continuous process.
Continuous, just keeps rolling along. Rolling, rolling, rolling
along...
...Fertilization, when the sperm fertilizes the egg. Which is usually
a few moments after the man says "Gee, honey, I was going to pull out
but the phone rang and it startled me." Fertilization.
|
| Show full article (2.08Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: bigfletch8bigfletch8 Date: Aug 4, 2008 21:43
On Aug 5, 2:32Â pm, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:> On Aug 4, 7:58 pm, C3 aol.com> wrote:
>>> Christopher Reeve supported stem cell research which is the brutal
>> scientific murder and manipulation of innocent lives and he tried to
>> claim he saved lives in the process of destroying them.
>
> Now, is a fetus a human being? This seems to be the central question.
> Well, if a fetus is a human being, how come the census doesn't count
> them? If a fetus is a human being, how come when there's a miscarriage
> they don't have a funeral? If a fetus is a human being, how come
> people say "we have two children and one on the way" instead of saying
> "we have three children?" People say life begins at conception, I say
> life began about a billion years ago and it's a continuous process.
> Continuous, just keeps rolling along. Rolling, rolling, rolling
> along...
>
> ...Fertilization, when the sperm fertilizes the egg. Which is usually
> a few moments after the man says "Gee, honey, I was going to pull out
> but the phone rang and it startled me." Fertilization. ...
|
| Show full article (2.50Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ImmortalistImmortalist Date: Aug 4, 2008 22:10
On Aug 4, 9:43 pm, "bigflet...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
wrote:> On Aug 5, 2:32 pm, Immortalist yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> On Aug 4, 7:58 pm, C3 aol.com> wrote:>
>>> Christopher Reeve supported stem cell research which is the brutal
>>> scientific murder and manipulation of innocent lives and he tried to
>>> claim he saved lives in the process of destroying them.
>
>> Now, is a fetus a human being? This seems to be the central question.
>> Well, if a fetus is a human being, how come the census doesn't count
>> them? If a fetus is a human being, how come when there's a miscarriage
>> they don't have a funeral? If a fetus is a human being, how come
>> people say "we have two children and one on the way" instead of saying
>> "we have three children?" People say life begins at conception, I say
>> life began about a billion years ago and it's a continuous process.
>> Continuous, just keeps rolling along. Rolling, rolling, rolling ...
|
| Show full article (3.24Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Robert CohenRobert Cohen Date: Aug 4, 2008 22:40
The cruelty of perpetuating the sufferings of actual human beings is
perverse, regressive religious belief.
The blocking of stem cell research is literally the furthering of pain
and misery.
The wealthy have no problems going offshore for state of the art
medical treatments.
Bush has seemingly set U.S.stem cell research back at least 8 years.
I personally did not vote for the ignorant fool twice, sensing he
isn't suitable for the responsibilities.
Many Bush II voters are apparently regretting their folly, while
those whom are desperately needing cures feel much worse than regret
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
