> On Sep 14, 7:01 pm, "bigflet...@gmail.com" gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

>> I remember many years ago, my older brother and his mate were walking
>> home after a 'couple of beers' . Just mildly relaxed. Far from
>> intoxicated and neither touched drugs.

>

>> They both saw a couple of UFO's. Their nature was such, that one
>> wouldnt have mentioned it to the other for the fear of being
>> ridiculed.

>

>> They mentioned it to me, because they knew I was open minded and had a
>> mild curiosity of the subject.

>

>> I had just read what at the time, seemed quite feasable, regarding an
>> individualls ability to see (and hear) beyond the normal spectrum.

>

>> I was amazed how even the mention of such an explanation put me, in
>> their eyes, where they felt they would be put, if mentioned to ther
>> work mates.

>

>> That was a good lesson in judgment. When a belief dominates, there is
>> little room for open mindedness, regardless of the evidence.

>
> Does the principle in the sentence apply to the belief in the sentence
> also?
>

>

>> Any reference to the 911 interpretations is purely coincidental !!!

>

>> BOfL- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -